Building on the relevant international literature, as well as empirical research on urban cases, this article determines and discusses five core values of good urban governance: responsiveness, effectiveness, procedural justice, resilience, and counterbalance. The quest for good governance can take various forms. This article focuses on urban governance, and identifies four different shifts, with increased emphasis on the real decision makers or the ordinary citizens, with increased attention to selective choice or integrative deliberation as modes of urban governance. Urban governance and good urban governance are not synonymous. This article advocates critical reflection, moving beyond the performance bias that tends to accompany governance reform.
BoluijtB.DrosterijG.HendriksF.2012a. “Omgaan met botsende verwachtingen: Burgers aan Zet! in Dordrecht” [Dealing with Conflicting Expectations: Citizens Turn! In Dordrecht]. In De zucht naar goed bestuur in de stad: Lessen uit een weerbarstige werkelijkheid, edited by HendriksF.DrosterijG., 31–46. The Hague: Boom/Lemma.
8.
BoluijtB.DrosterijG.HendriksF.2012b. “Samen maken we de Stad: Naar een nieuw besturingsmodel in Zwolle” [Let's Build This Town Together: Towards a New Steering Model in Zwolle]. In De zucht naar goed bestuur in de stad: Lessen uit een weerbarstige werkelijkheid, edited by HendriksF.DrosterijG., 79–90. The Hague: Boom/Lemma.
9.
BovairdT.2005. “Public Governance: Balancing Stakeholder Power in a Network Society.”International Review of Administrative Sciences71 (2): 217–28.
10.
BovairdT.LöfflerE.2003. “Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies.”International Review of Administrative Sciences69:313–28.
11.
BoxR.1998. Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
12.
CallahanM.2005. “Institutionalizing Participation and Governance? New Participative Structures in Local Government in Ireland.”Public Administration83 (4): 909–29.
13.
ColeA.2011. “France, between Centralisation and Localisation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by LoughlinJ.HendriksF.LidströmA., 307–30. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
14.
Council of Europe. 2008. The Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance at Local Level. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
15.
DaalderH.1987. “Countries in Comparative European Politics.”European Journal of Political Research15:3–21.
16.
DahlR. A.1994. “A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation.”Political Science Quarterly109:23–34.
17.
DailyC. M.DaltonD. R.CannellaA. A.Jr.2003. “Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data.”The Academy of Management Review28 (3): 371–82.
18.
DenisD. K.McConnellJ. J.2003. “International Corporate Governance.”The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis38 (1): 1–36.
19.
De RynckF.VoetsJ.2005. “Re-institutionalisation in the Flemish Region: Cases of Collaborative Management.” In Urban-Regional Cooperation in the EU: Practices and Prospects, edited by HendriksF.van StipdonkV.TopsP., 163–86. The Hague: Elsevier.
20.
DiGaetanoA.KlemanskiJ. S.1993. “Urban Regime Capacity: A Comparison of Birmingham, England, and Detroit, Michigan.”Journal of Urban Affairs15 (4): 367–84.
21.
DrosterijG.2008. Politics as Jurisdiction: A New Understanding of Public and Private in Political Theory. Tilburg: Tilburg Univ. Press.
22.
DuyvendakJ. W.HendriksF.van NiekerkM.2009. City in Sight: Dutch Dealings with Urban Change. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Press.
23.
EsaiassonP.2010. “Will Citizens Take No for an Answer? What Government Officials Can Do to Enhance Decision Acceptance.”European Political Science Review2 (3): 351–71.
24.
FinerS.1999. The History of Government from the Earliest Times, Parts I–III. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
25.
FlyvbjergB.1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
26.
FlyvbjergB.2003. Mega Projects and Risk: An Anatomy of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
27.
FranzkeJ.2007. “European Experiences in Participatory Budgeting: Prioritising the Borough Budget in Berlin-Lichtenberg.”Governance International1:1–10.
GualiniE.2005. “The Milan Urban Region and Local Cooperation: Framing Local Governance by Innovating Policies.” In Urban-Regional Cooperation in the EU: Practices and Prospects, edited by HendriksF.van StipdonkV.TopsP., 143–62. The Hague: Elsevier.
32.
HajerM.WagenaarH., eds. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
33.
HallP. A.1982. The Great Planning Disasters. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
34.
HardingA.1994. “Urban Regimes and Growth Machines: Towards a Cross-National Research Agenda.”Urban Affairs Quarterly29 (3): 356–82.
35.
HausM.HeineltH.StewartM., eds. 2005. Urban Governance and Democracy. London: Routledge.
36.
HeineltH.SweetingD.GemitisP., eds. 2006. Legitimacy and Urban Governance. London: Routledge.
37.
HendriksF.1999a. Public Policy and Political Institutions: The Role of Culture in Urban Policy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
38.
HendriksF.1999b. “The Post-Industrialising City: Political Perspectives and Cultural Biases.”GeoJournal47 (3): 425–32.
39.
HendriksF.2010. Vital Democracy: A Theory of Democracy in Action. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
40.
HendriksF.DrosterijG., eds. 2012. De zucht naar goed bestuur in de stad: Lessen uit een weerbarstige werkelijkheid [The Quest for Good Governance in the City: Lessons from Complex Realities]. The Hague: Boom/Lemma.
41.
HendriksF.MussoJ.2004. “Making Local Democracy Work: Neighborhood-Oriented Reform in Los Angeles and the Dutch Randstad.” In Tampering with Tradition, edited by BogasonP.KensenS.MillerH., 39–61. Lanham: Lexington Books.
42.
HoggartK.ClarkT. N., eds. 2000. Citizen Responsive Governance. The Hague: Elsevier.
43.
HoodC.1998. The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
44.
HunterF.1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: Univ. of Carolina Press.
45.
IsraelJ.1995. The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
46.
KeatingM.1991. Comparative Urban Politics: Power and the City in the US, Canada, Britain and France. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
KooimanJ.2003. Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
49.
LauriaM.ed. 1997. Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
50.
LijphartA.1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
51.
LoughlinJ.2011. “Ireland: Halting Steps to Local Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by LoughlinJ.HendriksF.LidströmA., 48–67. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
52.
LowndesV.SkelcherC.1998. “The Dynamics of Multi-organizational Partnerships: An Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance.”Public Administration76 (2): 313–33.
53.
MacchiavelliN. (1513) 1998. The Discourses. London: Penguin Classics.
54.
Ministerie vanBZK. 2009. Nederlandse Code voor Goed Openbaar Bestuur [Dutch Code for Good Public Governance]. The Hague: Ministerie van BZK.
55.
MulganG.2006. Good and Bad Power: The Ideals and Betrayals of Government. London: Penguin.
56.
MussoJ. A.WeareC.OztasN.LogesW.2006. “Neighborhood Governance Reform and Networks of Community Power in Los Angeles.”The American Review of Public Administration36 (1): 79–97.
57.
NoveckB. S.2009. Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
OstromV.1973. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Birmingham: Univ. of Alabama Press.
60.
OstromV.1982. “A Forgotten Tradition: The Constitutional Level of Analysis.” In Missing Elements in Political Inquiry, edited by GillespieJ. A.ZinnesD. A., 237–52. London: Sage.
61.
OstromV.TieboutC. M.WarrenR.1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.”American Political Science Review55 (4): 831–42.
62.
PetersB. G.PierreJ.1998. “Governance without Government? Rethinking Public Administration.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8 (2): 223–43.
PierreJ.PetersB. G.2000. Governance, Politics and the State. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
PietrancostaA.2009. Enforcement of Corporate Governance Code: A Legal Perspective. Tilburg: Tilburg Univ. Press.
68.
PutnamR. D.1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
69.
PutnamR. D.2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century.”Scandinavian Political Studies30 (2): 137–74.
70.
RhodesR. A. W.1996. “The New Governance: Governing without Government.”Political Studies44:652–67.
71.
RhodesR. A. W.1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open Univ. Press.
72.
RhodesR. A. W.2000. “Governance and Public Administration.” In Debating Governance, edited by PierreJ., 54–90. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
73.
RhodesR. A. W.2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.”Organization Studies28 (8): 1243–64
74.
RosanvallonP.2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in the Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
75.
RothsteinB.TeorellJ.2008. “What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions.”Governance21 (2): 165–90.
76.
ScharpfF. W.1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview.
77.
ScharpfF. W.1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
78.
StassenH. E.1942. “E Pluribus Unum” [Out of Many, One]. Public Administration Review2 (3): 187–94.
79.
StokerG.1995. “Regime Theory and Urban Politics.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by JudgeD.StokerG.WolmanH., 54-72. London: Sage.
80.
StokerG.1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.”International Social Science Journal155:17–28.
81.
StokerG.2000. “Urban Political Science and the Challenge of Urban Governance.” In Perspectives on Governance, edited by PierreJ., 91–109. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
82.
StokerG.2011. “Was Local Governance Such a Good Idea? A Global Comparative Perspective.”Public Administration89 (1): 15–31.
83.
StoneC. N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
SunsteinC.2008. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
86.
SurowieckiJ.2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few. London: Abacus.
87.
SwyndegouwE.2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State.”Urban Studies42 (11): 1991–2006.
88.
ToonenT. A. J.2010. “Resilience in Public Administration: The Work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a Public Administration Perspective.”Public Administration Review70 (2): 193–202.
89.
TylerT.DarleyJ.2000. “Building a Law-abiding Society, Taking Public Views about Morality and the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities into Account When Formulating Substantive Law.”Hofstra Law Review28:482–97.
90.
TylerT.HuoY. J.2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage.
91.
UitermarkJ.DuyvendakJ. W.2008. “Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighborhood Governance in the Netherlands.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (1): 114–31.
92.
United Nations Development Programme. 1977. Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
93.
Van OstaaijenJ.DrosterijG.2012. “Tussen woorden en daden: De Bredase wijktafels en de vraag naar goed bestuur” [Between Words and Deeds: Neighborhood Tables in Breda and the Demand for Good Governance]. In De zucht naar goed bestuur in de stad: Lessen uit een weerbarstige werkelijkheid, edited by HendriksF.DrosterijG., 47–62. The Hague: Boom/Lemma.
94.
Van OstaaijenJ.SchaapL.2012. “De legitimiteit van regionale samenwerking: Het regime Brainport” [The Legitimacy of Regional Cooperation: The Brainport Regime]. In De zucht naar goed bestuur in de stad: Lessen uit een weerbarstige werkelijkheid, edited by HendriksF.DrosterijG., 91–108. The Hague: Boom/Lemma.
95.
WagenaarC.1992. Welvaartsstad in wording: De wederopbouw van Rotterdam 1940-1952 [Welfare State in the Making: The Reconstruction of Rotterdam 1940-1952]. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
96.
WagenaarH.DuivemanR.2012. “De kwaliteit van een stadswijk: Good governance door stedelijke daadkracht in Den Haag” [The Quality of an Urban Quarter: Good Governance through Vigor in The Hague]. In De zucht naar goed bestuur in de stad: Lessen uit een weerbarstige werkelijkheid, edited by HendriksF.DrosterijG., 63–78. The Hague: Boom/Lemma.
