A growing number of states are using state-run school districts to take over and improve persistently underperforming schools. This article uses Georgia to examine the politics of state takeover. We analyze the supporting and opposing coalitions as well as the alignment between state takeover and charter schools in the campaign for the constitutional amendment to create a statewide turnaround district. Our findings show that corporate interests, the governor, and nonprofit organizations supported state takeover, whereas educators, parents, and community organizations opposed state takeover. There was bipartisan support across coalitions and a crisscrossing of interests regarding local control and the path to school improvement. There are divergent views on charter schools, with supporters of state takeover favoring charter schools.
AinusonKweku. 2009. “An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Water Policy Change in Ghana: A Look at Belief Systems and Policy Oriented Learning.” Journal of African Studies and Development1 (2): 16–27.
2.
AlvarezBrenda. 2016. “Educators Mobilize as School Takeovers Open Door for Charter Expansion.” The National Education Association Today, August23. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://neatoday.org/2016/08/23/school-takeover/.
BulkleyKatrina E.HenigJeffrey R.2015. “Local Politics and Portfolio Management Models: National Reform Ideas and Local Control.” Peabody Journal of Education90 (1): 53–83.
8.
BurasKristen L.2014. Charter Schools, Race, and Urban Space: Where the Market Meets Grassroots Resistance. New York: Routledge.
9.
BurnsPeter. 2010. “Race and Support for State Takeovers of Local School Districts.” Urban Education45 (3): 274–92.
10.
ChambersStefanie. 2002. “Urban Education Reform and Minority Political Empowerment.” Political Science Quarterly117 (4): 643–65.
11.
ChambersStefanie. 2006. Mayors and Schools: Minority Voices and Democratic Tensions in Urban Education. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
CooperBruce S.FusarelliLance DarinRandallE. Vance. 2004. Better Policies, Better Schools: Theories and Applications. Boston: Pearson College Division.
14.
DeBrayElizabethScottJanelleLubienskiChristopherJabbarHuriya. 2014. “Intermediary Organizations in Charter School Policy Coalitions: Evidence from New Orleans.” Educational Policy28 (2): 175–206.
GuldbrandssonKarinFossumBjöörn. 2009. “An Exploration of the Theoretical Concepts Policy Windows and Policy Entrepreneurs at the Swedish Public Health Arena.” Health Promotion International24 (4): 434–44.
24.
HansenJanetHallMichelleBrewerDominicHannawayJane. 2015. “The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in Financing Public Schools.” In Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, edited by LaddHelen F.GoertzMargaret E., 314–31. New York: Routledge.
25.
Harvard Family Research Project. 2007. “Evaluation Based on Theories of the Policy Process.” The Evaluation Exchange8 (1–2). Accessed June 9, 2017. http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/profile.
26.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
HurshDavid. 2007. “Assessing No Child Left Behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Education Policies.” American Educational Research Journal44 (3): 493–518.
KingdonJohn W.2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Update Edition, with an Epilogue on Health Care. 2nd ed.Boston: Pearson.
40.
KirstMichaelEdelsteinFritz. 2006. “The Maturing Mayoral Role in Education.” Harvard Educational Review76 (2): 152–64.
41.
KretchmarKerrySondelBethFerrare.Joseph J.2014. “Mapping the Terrain: Teach for America, Charter School Reform, and Corporate Sponsorship.” Journal of Education Policy29 (6): 742–59.
42.
KublerDaniel. 2001. “Understanding Policy Change with the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Application to Swiss Drug Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy8 (4): 623–41.
LeeWoogulReeveJohnmarshall. 2012. “Teachers’ Estimates of Their Students’ Motivation and Engagement: Being in Synch with Students.” Educational Psychology32 (6): 727–47.
45.
LemkeThomas. 2002. “Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique.” Rethinking Marxism14 (3): 49–64.
46.
LevinHenry M.DaschbachJoePerryAndre. 2010. “A Diverse Education Provider: New Orleans.” In Between Public and Private: Politics, Governance, and the New Portfolio Models for Urban School Reform, edited by HessFrederick M., 165–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
47.
LipmanPauline. 2013. “Economic Crisis, Accountability, and the State’s Coercive Assault on Public Education in the USA.” Journal of Education Policy28 (5): 557–73.
48.
LipmanPaulineHainesNathan. 2007. “From Accountability to Privatization and African American Exclusion: Chicago’s ‘Renaissance 2010.’” Educational Policy21 (3): 471–502.
49.
MawhinneyHanne B.2013. “Reactive Sequences in the Evolution of Maryland’s Consequential Accountability Regime.” Educational Policy27 (2): 279–306.
50.
McDermottKathryn A.1999. Controlling Public Education: Localism Versus Equity. Studies in Government and Public Policy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
McDonnellLorraine M.WeatherfordM. Stephen. 2013. “Evidence Use and the Common Core State Standards Movement: From Problem Definition to Policy Adoption.” American Journal of Education120 (1): 1–25.
53.
McDougallLori. 2016. “Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management5 (5): 309–20.
54.
MehtaJal. 2013. “How Paradigms Create Politics: The Transformation of American Educational Policy, 1980–2001.” American Educational Research Journal50 (2): 285–324.
55.
MerriamSharan B.1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
MintropHeinrichTrujilloTrina. 2005. “Corrective Action in Low Performing Schools: Lessons for NCLB Implementation from State and District Strategies in First Generation Accountability Systems.”http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/153/279.
57.
OliverPamela E.MarwellGerald. 1988. “The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II.” American Sociological Review53:1–8.
58.
OluwoleJoseph O.GreenPreston C.III. 2009. “State Takeovers of School Districts: Race and the Equal Protection Clause.” Indiana Law Review42:343–409.
59.
QuardokusKathleenHendersonCharles. 2015. “Promoting Instructional Change: Using Social Network Analysis to Understand the Informal Structure of Academic Departments.” Higher Education70 (3): 315–35.
ReckhowSarah. 2012. Follow the Money: How Foundation Dollars Change Public School Politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
62.
ReckhowSarahHenigJeffrey R.JacobsenRebeccaLittJamie Alter. 2016. “‘Outsiders with Deep Pockets’: The Nationalization of Local School Board Elections.” Urban Affairs Review. Published electronically August10: 1–29 doi:10.1177/1078087416663004.
63.
RipbergerJoseph T.GuptaKuhikaSilvaCarol L.Jenkins-SmithHank C.2014. “Cultural Theory and the Measurement of Deep Core Beliefs Within the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Policy Studies Journal42 (4): 509–27.
64.
SaltmanKenneth J.2012. Failure of Corporate School Reform. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
StichBethanyMillerChad R.2008. “Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Understand Freight Transportation Policy Change.” Public Works Management & Policy13 (1): 62–74.
The Associated Press. 2012. “Attention Shifts to New Charter School Commission.” Access North Georgia, November12. Accessed June 9, 2017. http://accesswdun.com/print/2012/11/255093.
TochThomas. 1991. In the Name of Excellence: The Struggle to Reform the Nation’s Schools, Why It’s Failing, and What Should Be Done. Cary: Oxford Univ. Press.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Vol. 8. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
89.
WelshRichard O.HallMichelle. forthcoming. “The Point of No Return? Interest Groups, School Board Elections and the Sustainment of the Portfolio Management Model in Post-Katrina New Orleans.” Teachers College Record.
90.
WongKenneth K.Shen.Francis X.2003. “Measuring the Effectiveness of City and State Takeover as a School Reform Strategy.” Peabody Journal of Education78 (4): 89–119.
91.
WongKenneth K.Shen.Francis X.2007. “Mayoral Leadership Matters: Lessons Learned from Mayoral Control of Large Urban School Systems.” Peabody Journal of Education82 (2): 737–68.
