Recent election cycles have seen growing attention to the role of “outside” money in urban school board elections. Using an original data set of more than 16,000 contributions covering election cycles from 2008 to 2013 in four school districts (Los Angeles, CA; New Orleans, LA; Denver, CO; Bridgeport, CT), we show how large national donors play a significant role. Our study links two dynamic fields that are rarely studied together: (1) the behavior of wealthy donors in a changing national campaign finance system and (2) the evolving politics of urban education. By examining donor networks, we illuminate the mechanisms behind the nationalization of education politics and national donor involvement in local campaigns. We show that shared affiliations through education organizations are significantly associated with school board campaign contributions.
AdamsBrian E.2006. “Suburban Money in Central City Elections: The Geographic Distribution of Campaign Contributions.”Urban Affairs Review42 (2): 267–80.
2.
AdamsBrian E.2007. “Fundraising Coalitions in Open-Seat Mayoral Elections.”Journal of Urban Affairs29 (5): 481–99.
3.
AdamsBrian E.2008. “Fund-Raising Coalitions in School Board Elections.”Education and Urban Society40 (4): 411–27.
4.
AdamsBrian E.2011. “Financing Local Elections: The Impact of Institutions on Electoral Outcomes and Democratic Representation.”PS: Political Science and Politics44 (1): 111–12.
5.
AnziaSarah. 2011. “Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups.”Journal of Politics73 (3): 412–27.
6.
AuWayneFerrareJoseph J.2014. “Sponsors of Policy: A Network Analysis of Wealthy Elites, Their Affiliated Philanthropies, and Charter School Reform in Washington State.”Teachers College Record116 (8): 1–24.
7.
BerkmanMichael B.PlutzerEric. 2005. Ten Thousand Democracies: Politics and Public Opinion in America’s School Districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
BonicaAdam. 2013. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public Version 1.0. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Libraries. Accessed July 21, 2016. http://data.stanford.edu/dime.
11.
BonicaAdam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.”American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 367–86.
BulkleyKatrina E.HenigJeffrey R.LevinHenry M. eds. 2010. Between Public and Private: Politics, Governance, and the New Portfolio Models for Urban School Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
15.
BurrisVal. 2005. “Interlocking Directorates and Political Cohesion Among Corporate Elites.”American Journal of Sociology111 (1): 249–83.
16.
ChellappaRamnath K.SarafNilesh. 2010. “Alliances, Rivalry, and Firm Performance in Enterprise Systems Software Markets: A Social Network Approach.”Information Systems Research21 (4): 849–71.
17.
ChoWendy K. TamGimpelJames G.2007. “Prospecting for (Campaign) Gold.”American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 255–68.
18.
CowenJoshuaStrunkKatherine. 2014. “How Do Teachers’ Unions Influence Education Policy? What We Know and What We Need to Learn.” Working Paper, The Education Policy Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
19.
CrowsonRobert L.GoldringEllen B. eds. 2009. The New Localism in American Education. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
DeckmanMelissa. 2004. School Board Battles: The Christian Right in Local Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
21.
FeuersteinAbe. 2002. “Elections, Voting, and Democracy in Local School District Governance.”Educational Policy16 (1): 15–36.
22.
FleischmannArnoldSteinLana. 1998. “Campaign Contributions in Local Elections.”Political Research Quarterly51 (3): 673–89.
23.
FranzMichael. 2012. “Interest Groups in Electoral Politics: 2012 in Context.”The Forum10 (4): 62–79.
24.
GimpelJames G.LeeFrances E.KaminskiJoshua. 2006. “The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions in American Politics.”The Journal of Politics68 (3): 626–39.
HenigJeffrey R.2009. “The Politics of Localism in an Era of Centralization, Privatization, and Choice.” In The New Localism in American Education, 108th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, edited by CrowsonRobert L.GoldringEllen B., 112–29. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
HenigJeffrey R.StoneClarence E.2008. “Rethinking School Reform: The Distractions of Dogma and the Potential for a New Politics of Progressive Pragmatism.”American Journal of Education114 (3): 191–218.
30.
HenigJeffrey R.HulaRichard C.OrrMarionPedescleauxDesiree S.1999. The Color of School Reform. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
31.
HessFrederick M.LealDavid L.2005. “School House Politics: Expenditures, Interests, and Competition in School Board Elections.” In Besieged: School Boards and the Future of Education Politics, edited by HowellWilliam, 292–302. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32.
HessFrederick M.MeeksOlivia. 2011. School Boards Circa 2010: Governance in the Accountability Era. National School Boards Association. Accessed July 21, 2016. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED515849.pdf.
33.
HolbrookThomas M.WeinschenkAaron C.2014. “Money, Candidates, and Mayoral Elections.”Electoral Studies35:292–302.
34.
KirstMichaelWirtFrederick M.2009. The Political Dynamics of American Education. 4th ed.New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
KrackhardtDavid. 1988. “Predicting with Networks: Nonparametric Multiple Regression Analysis of Dyadic Data.”Social Networks10 (4): 359–81.
36.
KrebsTimothy B.2005. “Money and Machine Politics: An Analysis of Corporate and Labor Contributions in Chicago City Council Elections.”Urban Affairs Review41 (1): 47–64.
37.
KrebsTimothy B.HolianDavid B.2005. “Media and Momentum: Strategic Contributing in a Big-City Mayoral Election.”Urban Affairs Review40 (5): 614–33.
38.
MannaPaul. 2006. School’s In: Federalism and the National Education Agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
39.
MannaPaulMoffittSusan. 2014. “New Education Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. States: National Snapshot and a Case Study of Advance Illinois.” Prepared for the Wallace Foundation, New York.
40.
MarschallMelissaShahParu (producers and distributors). 2013. The Local Elections in America Project. Center for Local Elections in American Politics. Kinder Institute for Urban Research, Rice University. (Database).
41.
MarschallMelissaShahParuRuhilAnirudh. 2011. “The Study of Local Elections: A Looking Glass into the Future.”PS: Political Science and Politics44 (1): 97–100.
42.
MarshJulie A.WohlstetterPriscilla. 2013. “Recent Trends in Intergovernmental Relations: The Resurgence of Local Actors in Education Policy.”Educational Researcher42 (5): 276–83.
McDermottKathryn A.1999. Controlling Public Education: Localism Versus Equity. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
45.
McGuinnPatrick J.2006. No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy: 1965–2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
46.
McGuinnPatrick J.2012. “Stimulating Reform: Race to the Top, Competitive Grants, and the Obama Education Agenda.”Educational Policy26 (1): 136–59.
47.
MoeTerry. 2006a “Political Control and the Power of the Agent.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization22 (1): 1–29.
48.
MoeTerry. 2006b. “The Union Label on the Ballot Box.”Education Next6 (3): 58–66.
49.
MoeTerry. 2011. Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America’s Public Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
50.
OliverPamela E.MarwellGerald. 1988. “The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II.”American Sociological Review53 (1): 1–8.
51.
PageBenjamin I.BartelsLarry M.SeawrightJason. 2013. “Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans.”Perspectives on Politics11 (1): 51–73.
52.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
53.
SapotichneJoshuaJonesBryan D.WolfeMichelle. 2007. “Is Urban Politics a Black Hole? Analyzing the Boundary Between Political Science and Urban Politics.”Urban Affairs Review43 (1): 76–106.
SinclairBetsy. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
56.
SmrekarClaire S.CrowsonRobert L.2015. “Localism Rediscovered: Toward New Political Understandings in School District Governance.”Peabody Journal of Education90 (1): 1–8.
57.
StoneClarence. 2015. “Reflections on Regime Politics: From Governing Coalition to Urban Political Order.”Urban Affairs Review51 (1): 101–37.
WolbrechtChristinaHartneyMichael T.2014. “Ideas About Interests: Explaining the Changing Partisan Politics of Education.”Perspectives on Politics12 (3): 603–30.
