When candidates run for municipal office, do they rely on campaign contributions from suburbanites? This research note explores this question by analyzing fund-raising networks in four central cities: New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle. The majority of campaign contributions to mayoral and city council candidates come from within their city. While the fund-raising networks of central-city candidates extend into the suburbs, they only do so partially. In particular, they only connect to a handful of wealthy suburbs that are geographically close to the central city. Regional fund-raising networks are limited, indicating that the flow of political money does not mirror the economic and policy interdependence that has been documented by new regionalists.
Barnes, William R., and Larry C. Ledebur.1998. The new regional economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Brown, Clifford W., Lynda W. Powell, and Clyde Wilcox. 1995. Serious money. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
Cho, Wendy K. Tam. 2003. Contagion effects and ethnic contribution networks. American Journal of Political Science47(2): 368-387.
4.
Downs, Anthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Dreier, Peter, John Mollenkopf, and Todd Swanstrom. 2001. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
6.
Espiritu, Yen Le.1992. Asian American panethnicity. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
7.
Fleischmann, Arnold, and Lara Stein. 1998. Campaign contributions in local elections. Political Research Quarterly51(3): 673-689.
8.
Francia, Peter L., John C. Green, Paul S. Herrnson, Lynda W. Powell, and Clyde Wilcox. 2003. The financiers of congressional elections. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Garreau, Joel. 1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
11.
Grenzke, Janet. 1988. Comparing contributions to U.S. House members from outside their district. Legislative Studies Quarterly13(1): 83-103.
12.
Hogan, Sean, and Dick Simpson. 2001. Campaign contributions and mayoral/aldermanic relationships: Building on Krebs and Pelissero. Urban Affairs Review37(1): 85-95.
13.
Krebs, Timothy B.2005a. Money and machine politics: An analysis of corporate and labor contributions in Chicago city council elections. Urban Affairs Review41(1): 47-64.
14.
Krebs, Timothy B.2005b. Urban interests and campaign contributions: Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs27(2): 165-175.
15.
Krebs, Timothy B., and John P. Pelissero.2001. Fund-raising coalitions in mayoral campaigns. Urban Affairs Review37(1): 67-84.
16.
Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A. Denton.1993. American apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
17.
Orfield, Myron. 1997. Metropolitics. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
18.
Orfield, Myron. 2002. American metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
19.
Pastor, Manuel Jr., Peter Dreier, J.Eugene Grigsby, and Marta Lopez-Garza.2000. Regions that work. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
20.
Post, Stephanie Shirley, and Robert M. Stein.2000. State economies, metropolitan governance, and urban-suburban economic dependence. Urban Affairs Review36(1): 46-60.
21.
Public Campaign. 2004. The color of money: The 2004 presidential race. Available from http://www.colorofmoney.org/com_2003.html.
22.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Voith, Richard. 1998. Do suburbs need cities? Journal of Regional Science38(3): 445-464.
27.
Weir, Margaret, Harold Wolman, and Todd Swanstrom. 2005. The calculus of coalitions: Cities, suburbs, and the metropolitan agenda. Urban Affairs Review40(6): 730-760.
