Scholars have recommended various strategies to combat land vacancy in shrinking cities. Side yard programs, in which adjacent homeowners purchase vacant lots, represent one such solution. We use the case study city of St. Louis, Missouri, to evaluate this approach’s potential for reducing residential land vacancy. The analysis reveals that while demand-side issues (i.e., affordability) exist, the supply-side barriers (i.e., restrictive guidelines and inequitable or illogical pricing structures) are the larger constraints for the program’s success. In St. Louis, the program as currently structured could find buyers for approximately 10.8% of vacant residential parcels if all eligible buyers were interested. Through comparison of policy scenarios, we conclude that program policy significantly influences a program’s potential success through a range of mechanisms including restrictions regarding buyers’ owner-occupancy status, side yard lot width maximums, and pricing structure. State legislation regarding tax foreclosure auctions and elements of urban design also influence program effectiveness.
ArmborstTobiasD’OcaDanielTheodoreGeorgeen. 2008. “Improve Your Lot!” In Cities Growing Smaller. Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative, 45-64. Cleveland: Kent State Univ.
2.
BeauregardRobert A.2009. “Shrinking Cities in the United States in Historical Perspective: A Research Note.” In The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context, edited by PallagstKarinaAberJasminAudiracIvonneCunningham-SabotEmmanueleFolSylvieMartinez-FernandezCristinaMoraesSergioMulliganHelenVargas-HernandezJoseWiechmannThorstenWuTongRichJessica, 61–68. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
3.
BeauregardRobert A.2013. “Strategic Thinking for Distressed Neighborhoods.” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 227–43. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
BerkmanHerman G.1956. “Decentralization and Blighted Vacant Land.” Land Economics32 (3): 270–80.
5.
BowmanAnnePaganoMichael A.2000. “Transforming America’s Cities: Policies and Conditions of Vacant Land.” Urban Affairs Review35 (4): 559–81.
CummingsJean L.DiPasqualeDeniseKahnMatthew E.2002. “Measuring the Consequences of Promoting Inner City Homeownership.” Journal of Housing Economics11 (3): 330–59.
DewarMargaret. 2006. “Selling Tax-Reverted Land: Lessons from Cleveland and Detroit.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (2): 167–80.
11.
DewarMargaret. 2013. “What Helps or Hinders Nonprofit Developers in Reusing Vacant, Abandoned, and Contaminated Property?” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 174–96. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
DewarMargaretThomasJune M. eds. 2013. The City After Abandonment. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
13.
EhrenfeuchtReniaNelsonMarla. 2013. “Recovery in a Shrinking City: Challenges to ‘Rightsizing’ Post-Katrina New Orleans.” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 133–50. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
GalsterGeorge. 2012. Driving Detroit: The Quest for Respect in Motown. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
GoldsteinJamesMichaelJensenReiskinEdward. 2001. Urban Vacant Land Redevelopment: Challenges and Progress. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
16.
HackworthJason. 2014. “The Limits to Market-Based Strategies for Addressing Land Abandonment in Shrinking American Cities.” Progress in Planning90:1–37.
17.
HerscherAndrew. 2013. “Detroit Art City: Urban Decline, Aesthetic Production, Public Interest.” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 64–83. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
18.
HollanderJustin. 2011a. “Can a City Successfully Shrink? Evidence from Survey Data on Neighborhood Quality.” Urban Affairs Review47 (1): 129–41.
LoweJeffrey S.BatesLisa K.2013. “Missing New Orleans: Lessons from the CDC Sector on Vacancy, Abandonment, and Reconstructing the Crescent City.” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 151–73. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
MallachAlan. 2010. Facing the Urban Challenge. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution and What Works Collaborative.
27.
McCallBenjamin D.2011. “Vacant Land Census for the City of Saint Louis: Land Use Intelligence for Policy and Planning.” Master’s Capstone, Saint Louis Univ.
28.
National Vacant Properties Campaign. 2005. Vacant Properties: The True Costs to Communities. Washington, DC: National Vacant Properties Campaign.
29.
PaganoMichael A.BowmanAnne. 2000. Vacant Land in Cities: An Urban Resource. Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution.
30.
PallagstKarina. 2009. “Shrinking Cities in the United States of America: Three Cases, Three Planning Stories.” In The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context, edited by PallagstKarinaAberJasminAudiracIvonneCunningham-SabotEmmanueleFolSylvieMartinez-FernandezCristinaMoraesSergioMulliganHelenVargas-HernandezJoseWiechmannThorstenWuTongRichJessica, 81–88. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
31.
PallagstKarina. 2010. “Viewpoint: The Planning Research Agenda: Shrinking Cities—A Challenge for Planning Cultures.” Town Planning Review81 (5): i–vi.
32.
PopperDeborah E.PopperFrank J.2002. “Small Can Be Beautiful: Coming to Terms with Decline.” Planning68 (7): 20–23.
33.
RyanBrent D.2012. Design After Decline. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
34.
SchillingJosephVasudevanRaksha. 2013. “The Promise of Sustainability Planning for Regenerating Older Industrial Cities.” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 244–67. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
SpaldingAudreyDudaThomas. 2011. Standstill: Is Saint Louis Hindering Development by Waiting for Large-Scale Miracles?St Louis, MO: Show-Me Institute.
37.
ThomasJune M.2013. “Targeting Strategies of Three Detroit CDCs.” In The City After Abandonment, edited by DewarMargaretThomasJune M., 197–244. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
38.
WachterSusan. 2004. The Determinants of Neighborhood Transformations in Philadelphia, Identification and Analysis: The New Kensington Pilot Study. Philadelphia: Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania.
39.
WhitakerStephanFitzpatrickThomas. 2013. “Deconstructing Distressed-Property Spillovers: The Effects of Vacant, Tax-Delinquent, and Foreclosed Properties in Housing Submarkets.” Journal of Housing Economics22 (2): 79–91.
