Regulating change in historic districts to maintain their character is a conservation tool used around the world. In spite of success elsewhere, heritage conservation districts are still resisted by many in North America. To address the concerns of those opposed, the oldest 32 of 93 districts in Ontario were studied. Resident surveys, land-use mapping, townscape evaluation, land value records, municipal documents, and interviews were used. Findings indicate that people who live and own property in districts are satisfied, requests for alterations are approved promptly, districts meet most of their goals, and property values perform better in the marketplace than those in surrounding areas.
AshworthG. J.2002. “Conservation Designation and the Revaluation of Property: The Risk of Heritage Innovation.” International Journal of Heritage Studies8 (1): 9–23.
2.
CoulsonN. E.LahrM. L.2005. “Gracing the Land of Elvis and Beale Street: Historic Designation and Property Values in Memphis.” Real Estate Economics33 (3): 487–507.
HaugheyP.BasoloV.2000. “The Effect of Dual Local and National Register Historic Designations on Single-Family Housing Prices in New Orleans.” Appraisal Journal69 (3): 283–90.
JessonJ.2001. “What’s in a Name?” Kitchener Waterloo Record, June23, A11.
12.
KilpatrickJ.1985. “House Price Implications of Historic District Designations.” Columbia: Univ. of South Carolina, College of Business Administration, Department of Banking, Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics.
13.
KilpatrickJ.2000. “Historic Districts Are Good for Your Pocketbook: The Impacts of Local Historic Districts on House Prices in South Carolina.” Columbia: South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
LeichenkoR.CoulsonE.ListokinD.2001. “Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: An Analysis of Texas Cities.” Urban Studies38 (11): 1973–87.
16.
LeimenstollJ.1996. Assessing the Impact of Local Historic Districts on Property Values in Greensboro, North Carolina. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation, Preservation Books.
17.
LynchK.1981. Good city form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18.
MasonR.2005. Economics and Historic Preservation: A Guide and Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.
19.
McClellandM.2005. Experiences with Heritage Conservation Districts. Address to the International Council on Monuments and Sites Canada Congress 2005, Toronto Ryerson Univ.
New York City Independent Budget Office. 2003. “The Impact of Historic Districts of Residential Property Values.” New York: New York City Independent Budget Office.
22.
ReeveA.GoodeyB.ShipleyR.2007. “Townscape Assessment: The Development of a Practical Tool for Monitoring and Assessing Visual Quality in the Built Environment.” Urban Morphology11 (1): 25–43.
23.
SchaefferP.MillerickC.1991. “The Impact of Historic Designation on Property Values: An Empirical Study.” Economic Development Quarterly5 (4): 301–11.
24.
SharpeC. A.2006. “House Prices in a Heritage Area: The Case of St. John’s, Newfoundland.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research15:175–201.
25.
ShipleyR.2000. “Heritage Designation and Property Values: Is There an Effect?” International Journal of Heritage Studies6 (1): 83–100.
26.
SlaterT. R.1984. “Preservation, Conservation and Planning in Historic Towns.” Geographical Journal150 (3): 322–34.
27.
UNESCO. 2010. “World Heritage Convention.” http://whc.unesco.org/ (accessed May 15, 2010).
