This study uses multiple measures of fragmentation and decentralization to assess the effects of these conditions on total local spending in 126 metropolitan regions and 538 counties in the same regions in 2002. The measures are derived from a recognized scheme that distinguishes among total, horizontal, and vertical dimensions of these conditions, and the models control for other causes of total local spending, including sprawl and interlocal spending. The study finds support for the claim that total spending by local governments is higher in regions and counties with more single purpose governments (vertical fragmentation), but also jurisdictions where a greater percentage of spending is done by counties (centralization). Findings also vary by unit of analysis and type of special purpose government, which suggests that the effects of governing structure are not as straightforward as theory suggests.
Berry, C.2008. "Piling On: The Fiscal Effects of Jurisdictional Overlap ." American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 802-20.
2.
Bickers, K.N., and R.M. Stein.2004. "Interlocal Cooperation and the Distribution of Federal Grant Awards." Journal of Politics66 (3): 800-822.
3.
Boyne, G.A.1992a. "Is There a Relationship Between Fragmentation and Local Government Cost?" Urban Affairs Quarterly28 (2): 317-22.
4.
Boyne, G.A.1992b. "Local Government Structure and Performance: Lessons from America." Public Administration70 (3): 333-57.
5.
Brennan, G., and J. Buchanan.1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
6.
Breton, A.1987. "Towards a Theory of Competitive Federalism." European Journal of Political Economy3 (1-2): 263-329.
7.
Buchanan, J., and R. Wagner.1977. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Campbell, R.J.2004. "Leviathan and Fiscal Illusion in Local Government Overlapping Jurisdictions." Public Choice120:301-29.
9.
Craw, M.2008. "Taming the Local Leviathan: Institutional and Economic Constraints on Municipal Budgets." Urban Affairs Review43 (5): 663-90.
10.
DiLorenzo, T.J.1983. "Economic Competition and Political Competition: An Empirical Note." Public Choice40 (2): 203-9.
11.
Dolan, D.E.1990. "Local Government Fragmentation: Does It Drive Up the Cost of Government?" Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (1): 28-45.
12.
Dollery, B.F., and A.C. Worthington .1996. "The Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Illusion." Journal of Economic Surveys10 (3): 261-97.
13.
Dowding, K., and T. Mergoupis.2003. "Fragmentation, Fiscal Mobility, and Efficiency." Journal of Politics65 (4): 1190-1207.
14.
Downs, A.1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15.
Eberts, R.W., and T.J. Gronberg.1988. "Can Competition Among Local Governments Constrain Government Spending?" Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Review1:2-9.
16.
Eberts, R.W., and T.J. Gronberg.1990. "Structure, Conduct, and Performance in the Local Public Sector." National Tax Journal43 (2): 165-73.
17.
Ewing, R., R. Pendall, and D. Chen.2002. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact. Washington, DC: Smart Growth America.
18.
Feld, L.P., G. Kirchgässner, and C.A. Schaltegger .2003. "Decentralized Taxation and the Size of Government: Evidence from Swiss State and Local Governments." CESifo Working Papers 1087. Paper presented at the 3rd Norwegian-German Seminar on Public Economics, Munich, June.
19.
Forbes, K.F., and E.M. Zampelli.1989. "Is Leviathan a Mythical Beast?" American Economic Review79 (3): 568-77.
20.
Foster, K.A.1997. The Political Economy of Single Purpose Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
21.
Hamilton, D., D. Miller, and J. Paytas.2004. "Exploring the Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of the Governing of Metropolitan Regions." Urban Affairs Review40 (2): 147-82.
22.
Hawkins, B.W., K.J. Ward, and M.P. Becker.1991. "Governmental Consolidation as a Strategy for Metropolitan Development." Public Administration Quarterly15 (2): 253-67.
Howell-Moroney, M.2008. "The Tiebout Hypothesis 50 Years Later: Lessons and Lingering Challenges for Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century." Public Administration Review68 (1): 97-109.
25.
Ihlanfeldt, K.R.1999. "The Geography of Economic and Social Opportunity in Metropolitan Areas." In Governance and Opportunity in Metropolitan America , edited by A. Altshuler, W. Morrill, H. Wolman, and F. Mitchell, 213-52. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
26.
Kelleher, C., and D. Lowery.2004. "Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts." Urban Affairs Review39 (6): 720-57.
27.
Kenyon, Daphne.1997. "Theories of Interjurisdictional Competition." New England Economic Review97 (2): 13-35.
28.
Lewis, P.G.1996. Shaping Suburbia: How Political Institutions Organize Urban Development. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
29.
Lowery, D.2000. "A Transactions Costs Model of Metropolitan Governance: Allocation Versus Redistribution in Urban America." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (1): 49-78.
30.
Lyons, W.E., D. Lowery, and R.H. DeHoog .1992. The Politics of Dissatisfaction: Citizens, Services, and Urban Institutions. Armonk, NY : M.E. Sharpe.
31.
Marlow, M.1995. "The Influence of Special District Governments on Public Spending and Debt." Applied Economics27 (7): 569-73.
32.
Miller, D.Y.2002. The Regional Governing of Metropolitan America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
33.
Mullins, D.R., and B.A. Wallin.2004. "Tax and Expenditure Limitations: Introduction and Overview." Public Budgeting and Finance24 (4): 2-15.
34.
Musso, J.A.1998. "Fiscal Federalism as a Framework for Governance." In Handbook of Public Finance, edited by F. Thompson and M. Green, 347-96. New York: Marcel Dekker.
35.
Nelson, M.A.1986. "An Empirical Analysis of State and Local Tax Structure in the Context of the Leviathan Model of Government." Public Choice49 (3): 283-94.
36.
Nelson, M.A.1987. "Searching for Leviathan: Comment and Extension." American Economic Review77 (1): 198-204.
37.
Oakerson, R.1999. Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis . Oakland, CA: Institute of Contemporary Studies Press.
38.
Oakerson, R.J., and R.B. Parks.1989. "Local Government Constitutions: A Different View of Metropolitan Government." American Review of Public Administration19 (4): 279-94.
39.
Oates, W.1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
40.
Oates, W.1985. "Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study." American Economic Review75 (4): 748-57.
41.
Ostrom, V., C. Tiebout, and R. Warren.1961. "The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry." American Political Science Review55:831-42.
42.
Post, S.S.2004. "Metropolitan Area Governance and Institutional Collective Action." In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, edited by R. Feiock, 67-91. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
43.
Raimondo, H.J.1989. "Leviathan and Federalism in the United States." Public Finance Review17 (2): 204-15.
44.
Rusk, D.1993. Cities Without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Press.
45.
Schneider, M.1986. "Fragmentation and the Growth of Local Government." Public Choice48 (3): 255-63.
46.
Schneider, M.1989a. The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia . Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
47.
Schneider, M.1989b. "Intermunicipal Competition, Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrats, and the Level of Suburban Competition." American Journal of Political Science33 (3): 612-28.
48.
Stansel, D.2006. "Interjurisdictional Competition and Local Government Spending in U.S. Metropolitan Areas." Public Finance Review34 (2): 173-94.
Stephens, G.R., and N. Wikstrom.2000. Metropolitan Government and Governance: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Analysis, and the Future. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
51.
Suyderhoud, Jack P.1994. "State-Local Revenue Diversification, Balance, and Fiscal Performance." Public Finance Review22 (2): 168-94.
52.
Swanstrom, Todd.2001. "What We Argue About When We Argue About Regionalism." Journal of Urban Affairs23 (5): 479-96.
53.
Tiebout, Charles.1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures." Journal of Political Economy44:416-24.
54.
Turnbull, G.K., and S.S. Djoundourian .1994. "The Median Voter Hypothesis: Evidence from General Purpose Local Governments." Public Choice81:233-40.
55.
Turnbull, Geoffrey K. and Salpie S. Djoundourian.1993. "Overlapping jurisdictions: Substitutes or complements?Public Choice75(3): 231-245.
56.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.2002. " Census of Governments: Compendium of Governments." Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
57.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.2002. "2002 Metropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates ." Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
58.
Wagner, Richard E.1976. "Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion, and Budgetary Choice ," Public Choice25(4): 45-61.
59.
Wallis, J., and W.E. Oates.1988. "Does Economic Sclerosis Set In with Age? An Empirical Study of the Olson Hypothesis." Kyklos41:397-417.
60.
Yeung, R.2009. "The Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on the Size of Government: A Meta-Analysis." Public Budgeting and Finance29 (4): 1-23.
61.
Zax, J.S.1989. "Is There a Leviathan in Your Neighborhood?" American Economic Review79 (3): 560-67.
62.
Zimmerman, J.1995. State-Local Relations: A Partnership Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Praeger .
