Using a citywide register of community involvement, this article tests two competing theories for explaining active citizenship through neighborhood context: one that emphasizes the opportunities available in the neighborhood, whether at the level of the individual, the social environment, or the physical environment, and one that explains how active citizenship can be regarded as a reaction to threats in the neighborhood. The present analysis suggests that both effects apply but in separate parts of the city. The analysis reveals a spatial dichotomy: In the nineteenth-century inner city, participation is more problem-related, whereas in the periphery, participation is explained by opportunities available. Simultaneously, the results warn against overemphasizing the neighborhood context as a determinant for participation.
Akkerman, T., M. Hajer, and J. Grin.2004. The interactive state: democratisation from above? Political Studies52 (1): 82-95.
2.
Austin, M.D., and Y. Baba.1990. Social determinants of neighbourhood attachments. Sociological Spectrum10:59-78.
3.
Babchuk, N., and A. Booth.1969. Voluntary association membership: A longitudinal analysis. American Sociological Review34 (1): 31-45.
4.
Beaumont, J., and M. Loopmans.2008. Towards radicalized communicative rationality: Resident involvement and urban democracy in Rotterdam and Antwerp. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (1): 95-113.
5.
Bell, W., and M.T. Force.1956. Urban neighborhood types and participation in formal associations. American Sociological Review21 (1): 25-34.
6.
Blum, T., and P. Kingston.1984. Homeownership and social attachment . Sociological Perspectives27:159-80.
7.
Body-Gendrot, S.2003. Local governance, community organization, and crime: The case of France. In Social capital and social citizenship, edited by S. Body-Gendrot and M. Gittell, 25-51. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
8.
Brown, B., D.D. Perkins, and G. Brown.2003. Place attachment in a revitalising neighbourhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology23:259-71.
9.
Brown, B.B., and C.M. Werner.1985. Social cohesiveness, territoriality and holiday decorations: The influence of cul-de-sacs. Environment and Behaviour17 (5): 539-65.
10.
Cook, J.1983. Citizen response in a neighbourhood under threat. American Journal of Community Psychology11:459-71.
11.
Coulter, P.B.1988. Political voice. Citizen demand for urban public services . Tuscaloosa: Univ. of Alabama Press .
12.
Cox, K.R.1982. Housing tenure and neighbourhood activism. Urban Affairs Quarterly18:107-29.
Cruikshank, B.1999. The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects . New York: Cornell Univ. Press .
15.
De Filippis, J.2001. The myth of social capital in community development. Housing Policy Debate12:781-806.
16.
De Filippis, J.2002. Symposium on social capital: An introduction. Antipode34:790-95.
17.
Eisen, A.1994. Survey of neighbourhood-based, comprehensive community empowerment initiatives. Health Education Quarterly21 (2): 235-52.
18.
Fine, B.2002. They f**k you up those social capitalists. Antipode34:796-99.
19.
Foley, P., and S. Martin.2000. A new deal for the community? Public participation in regeneration and local service delivery. Policy and Politics28:479-91.
20.
Foskett, J.M.1955. Social structure and social participation. American Sociological Review20 (4): 431-38.
21.
Gittel, R., and A. Vidal.1998. Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Howell, E.M., B. Devaney, M. McCormick, and K.T. Raykovich.1998. Back to the future: Community involvement in the Healthy Start Program. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law23 (2): 291-317.
23.
Hyman, H.H., and C.R. Wright.1971. Trends in voluntary association membership of American adults: Replication based on secondary analysis of national sample surveys. American Sociological Review36 (2): 191-206.
24.
Imrie, R.2004. Governing the cities and the urban renaissance. In New horizons in British urban policy, edited by C. Johnstone and M. Whitehead , 129-42. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
25.
Itzhaky, H., and A.S. York.2000. Sociopolitical control and empowerment: An extended replication. Journal of Community Psychology28:407-15.
26.
Jacobs, J.1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
27.
Kuo, F.E., W.C. Sullivan, R.L. Koley, and L. Brunson.1998. Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighbourhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology26 (6): 823-51.
Lepofski, J., and J.C. Fraser.2003. Building community citizens: Claiming the right to place-making in the city. Urban Studies40 (1): 127-42.
30.
Loopmans, M.2006. From residents to neighbours: The making of active citizens in Antwerp, Belgium. In Professionals between people and policy: Transformations in care and welfare in Europe, edited by J. Duyvendak, T. Knijn , and M. Kremer, 109-21. Amsterdam : AmsterdamUniv. Press.
31.
Loopmans, M.2007. Urban governance, neighbourhoods and organised residents . Resident mobilisation and urban policies in Antwerp , Belgium. PhD thesis, Catholic Univ. of Leuven.
32.
Loopmans, M.2008. Relevance, gentrification and the development of a new hegemony on urban policies in Antwerp, Belgium. Urban Studies45 (12): 2499-2519.
33.
Loopmans, M., P. De Decker, and C. Kesteloot. Forthcoming. Social mix and passive revolution A neo-Gramscian analysis of the social mix rhetoric in Flanders, Belgium . Housing Studies.
34.
Maloney, W., G. Smith, and G. Stoker.2000. Social capital and urban governance: Adding a more contextualized "topdown" perspective. Political Studies48 (4): 802-20.
35.
Mayer, M.2003. The onward sweep of social capital: Causes and consequences for understanding cities, communities and urban movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27 (1): 110-32.
36.
Mohan, G., and J. Mohan.2002. Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography26:191-210.
37.
Newman, O.1972. Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.
38.
Newman, O.1996. Creating defensible space. New York : U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development .
39.
Oldenburg, R.1999. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. New York: Marlowe.
O’Malley, P., and D. Palmer.1996. Post-Keynesian policing. Economy and Society25 (2): 137-55.
42.
Pannecoucke, I.2001. Good news from a housing sector with a bad reputation- The attitude of social tenants towards their living situation. Paper presented at the Young Housing Researchers preconference , Warsaw.
43.
Perkins, D.D., B.B. Brown, and R.B. Taylor.1996. The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations. Journal of Social Issues52 (1): 85-110.
44.
Perkins, D.D., P. Florin, R.C. Rich, A. Wandersman, and D.M. Chavis.1990. Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology18:83-115.
45.
Perkins, D.D., R.C. Rich, D.M. Chavis, A. Wandersman, and P. Florin.1986. The limited role of community organization in crime prevention and the promising role of crime prevention in community organization. Paper presented to the American Society of Criminology, Montreal.
46.
Perkins, D.D., A. Wandersman, R.C. Rich, and R.B. Taylor.1993. The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology13:29-49.
47.
Purdey, A.F., G.B. Adhikari, S.A. Robinson, and P.W. Cox.1994. Participatory health development in rural Nepal: Clarifying the process of community empowerment. Health Education Quarterly21 (3): 329-43.
48.
Putnam, R.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
49.
Putnam, R.D., and L.M. Feldstein.2003. Better together: Restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50.
Rose, N.1996. The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society25 (3): 327-56.
51.
Sampson, R.J., and S.W. Raudenbush .1999. Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighbourhoods. American Journal of Sociology105 (3): 603-51.
52.
Saunders, P.1990. A nation of home owners. London: Unwin.
53.
Scott, J.1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
54.
Skogan, W., and M. Maxfield.1981. Coping with crime: Individual and neighbourhood reactions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
55.
Taylor, R.B., B.A. Koons, E.M. Kurtz, J.R. Greene, and D.D. Perkins.1995. Street blocks with more nonresidential land use have more physical deterioration: Evidence from Baltimore and Philadelphia . Urban Affairs Review31:120-36.
56.
Uitermark, J.2005. The genesis and evolution of urban policy: A confrontation of regulationist and governmentality approaches. Political Geography24 (2): 137-63.
57.
Verba, S., K. Lehman Schlozman, and H.E. Brady.1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
58.
Verbrugge, L.M.1977. The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces56 (2): 576-97.
