Sustainability has become a popular concept influencing the work of community and economic development officials in city governments. However, the term sustainability lacks conceptual clarity, and a variety of programs could advance sustainability goals. Given this problem, this study asks, What does sustainability mean to city economic development officials? Q-methodology is used to identify which aspects of sustainability are most important to a sample of city officials in the San Francisco Bay Area. Three patterns of importance were identified, exhibiting emphases on urban design, traditional economic development, and civic engagement. Understanding the multiple meanings of sustainability for local government officials will be critical as city officials seek to advance this new priority for local governments and as scholars evaluate the implementation of urban sustainability programs.
Aguirre, Benigno E.2002. "Sustainable development" as collective surge. Social Science Quarterly83 (1): 101-18.
2.
Agyeman, Julian, and Briony Angus.2003. The role of civic environmentalism in the pursuit of sustainable communities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management46 (3): 345-63.
3.
Allen, Patricia.1999. Reweaving the food security safety net: Mediating entitlement and entrepreneurship. Agriculture and Human Values16 (2): 117-29.
4.
Bäckstrand, Karin.2003. Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics3 (4): 24-41.
5.
Barr, Stewart.2008. Environment and society: Sustainability, policy and the citizen. Burlington, VT: Ashgate .
6.
Barry, John, and John Proops.1999. Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics28 (3): 337-45.
7.
Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Communities.1997. Compact for a sustainable Bay Area: Economy, environment, equity. San Francisco: Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Communities.
8.
Bennett, Michael I. J., and Robert Giloth.2007. Economic development in American cities: The pursuit of an equity agenda. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
9.
Betsill, Michele M.2001. Mitigating climate change in U.S. cities: Opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment6 (4): 393-406.
10.
Birch, Eugenie Ladner, and Susan M. Wachter, eds. 2008. Growing greener cities: Addressing urban environmental issues in the twenty-first century . Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
11.
Blakely, Edward James, and Ted K. Bradshaw .2002. Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. 3d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Brown, Steven R., Dan W. Durning, and Sally Selden.1999. Q methodology. In Handbook of research methods in public administration, edited by G. J. Miller and M. L. Whicker.New York: Marcel Dekker .
13.
Bruff, Gareth E., and Adrian P. Wood.2000. Making sense of sustainable development: Politicians, professionals, and policies in local government. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18 (5): 593-607.
14.
Bulkeley, Harriet, and Michele Betsill .2003. Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. New York: Routledge.
15.
---. 2005. Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the "urban" politics of climate change. Environmental Politics14 (1): 42-63.
16.
California State Controller.2008. Cities Annual Report. 96th ed. Sacramento, CA: State of California.
17.
Day, Shane.2008. Applications of Q methodology to a variety of policy process theories and frameworks. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior11 (2): 141-71.
18.
DeLeon, Richard E.1992. Left coast city: Progressive politics in San Francisco, 1975-1991. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
19.
Donahue, Amy K.2004. Managerial perceptions and the production of fire protection . Administration & Society35 (6): 717-46.
20.
Elkington, John.1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review36 (2): 90-100.
21.
Faber, Niels, René Jorna, and Jo Van Engelen .2005. The sustainability of "sustainability"- A study into the conceptual foundations of the notion of "sustainability." Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management7 (1): 1-33.
22.
Feichtinger, Judith, and Michael Pregerinig .2005. Imagined citizens and participation: Local Agenda 21 in two communities in Sweden and Austria. Local Environment10 (3): 229-42.
23.
Feiock, Richard C., M. Jae Moon, and Hyung Jun Park.2008. Is the world "flat" or "spiky"? Rethinking the governance implications of globalization for economic development. Public Administration Review68 (1): 24-35.
24.
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel M., and Jose-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo .2008. Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in theEuropean Union. Sustainable Development16 (1): 17-34.
25.
Gendron, Richard, and G. William Domhoff .2009. The leftmost city: Power and progressive politics in Santa Cruz. Boulder, CO: Westview.
26.
Haughton, Graham.1997. Developing sustainable urban development models. Cities14 (4): 189-95.
27.
Hempel, Lamont C.2009. Conceptual and analytical challenges in building sustainable communities. In Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy, edited by D. A. Mazmanian and M. E. Kraft.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher .1999. Metropolitan development as a complex system: A new approach to sustainability. Economic Development Quarterly13 (2): 141-56.
29.
Jepson, Edward J., Jr.2003. The conceptual integration of planning and sustainability: An investigation of planners in the United States. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21 (3): 389-410.
30.
Jordan, Andrew.2008. The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26 (1): 17-33.
31.
Kahn, Matthew E.2006. Green cities: Urban growth and the environment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32.
Kauneckis, Derek, and Mark T. Imperial .2007. Collaborative watershed governance in Lake Tahoe: An institutional analysis. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior10 (4): 503-46.
33.
Krumholz, Norman.1999. Equitable approaches to local economic development. Policy Studies Journal27 (1): 83-95.
34.
Leuenberger, Deniz.2006. Sustainable development in public administration: A match with practice? Public Works Management & Policy10 (3): 195-201.
35.
Lindstrom, Bonnie.1998. Regional cooperation and sustainable growth. Journal of Urban Affairs20 (3): 327-42.
36.
Macias, Thomas.2008. Working toward a just, equitable, and local food system: The social impact of community-based agriculture. Social Science Quarterly89 (5): 1086-1101.
37.
Mayer, Heike, and Paul L. Knox .2006. Slow cities: Sustainable places in a fast world. Journal of Urban Affairs28 (4): 321-34.
38.
Mazmanian, Daniel A.2009. Los Angeles’ clean air saga-Spanning the three epochs . In Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy, edited by D. A. Mazmanian and M. E. Kraft.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Michael E. Kraft, eds. 2009. Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy. 2d ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
McKeown, Bruce, and Dan Thomas.1988. Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
McLean, Beverly, and James Bates.2003. Financing neighborhood businesses: Collaborative strategies. In Financing economic development in the 21st century , edited by S. B. White, R. D. Bingham, and E. W. Hill.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe .
42.
Parker, Paul, and Ian H. Rowlands .2007. City partners maintain climate change action despite national cuts: Residential energy efficiency programme valued at local level. Local Environment12 (5): 505-17.
43.
Pinderhughes, Raquel.2004. Alternative urban futures: Planning for sustainable development in cities throughout the world. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
Portney, Kent E.2003. Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
---. 2005. Civic engagement and sustainable cities in the United States. Public Administration Review65 (5): 579-91.
46.
Prugh, Thomas, Robert Costanza, and Herman E. Daly.2000. The local politics of global sustainability . Washington, DC: Island Press.
47.
Robbins, Paul.2004. Q methodology. In Encyclopedia of social measurement, edited by K. Kempf-Leonard.Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
48.
Roberts, Brian, and Michael Cohen.2002. Enhancing sustainable development by triple value adding to the core business of government. Economic Development Quarterly16 (2): 127-37.
49.
Robinson, Tony.2004. Hunger discipline and social parasites: The political economy of the living wage. Urban Affairs Review40:246-68.
50.
Sabatier, Paul A., Will Focht, Mark Lubell, Zev Trachtenberg, Arnold Vedlitz, and Marty Matlock.2005. Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
Selden, Sally Coleman, Gene A. Brewer, and Jeffrey L. Brudney .1999. Reconciling competing values in public administration: Understanding the administrative role concept. Administration & Society31 (2): 171-204.
52.
Servon, Lisa J.2006. Microenterprise development in the United States: Current challenges and new directions. Economic Development Quarterly20 (4): 351-67.
53.
Spur.2008. Building San Francisco’s cleantech economy: Analysis and strategy options. San Francisco : San Francisco Planning + Urban Research Association .
54.
Stephenson, William.1953. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology . Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press .
55.
Thomas, Deborah S. K., and Owen J. Furuseth .1997. The realities of incorporating sustainable development into local-level planning: A case study of Davidson, North Carolina. Cities14 (4): 219-26.
56.
U.S. Census Bureau.2000. United States Census2000. Washington, DC. Available at http://www.census.gov/main/www./cen2000.html .
57.
Webler, Thomas, Seth Tuler, Ingrid Shockey, Paul Stern, and Robert Beattie.2003. Participation by local governmental officials in watershed management planning. Society and Natural Resources16 (2): 105-21.
58.
Wheeler, Stephen, and Timothy Beatley, eds. 2004. The sustainable urban development reader. New York: Routledge.
59.
Wheeler, Stephen M.2000. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (2): 133-45.
