Democratic political institutions and interjurisdictional competition both put pressure on local elected officials to respond to the tax and spending preferences of residents. But the electoral success of California's Proposition 13 in 1978 and of similar property tax limitations in other states suggests that local expenditures and taxes in many jurisdictions are higher than those preferred by the median voter. I argue that this upward bias in expenditures is greater in communities where interjurisdictional competition is weak and local political institutions provide incentives for rent seeking. Using data from the 1997 Census of Governments and 1996 International City Manager Association (ICMA) Form of Government Survey, I find evidence that municipalities facing weaker competition tend to have higher spending, and political institutions mediate the marginal effect of competition on city expenditures.
Ahmed, S., and K.V. Greene.2000. Is the median voter a clear-cut winner? Comparing the median voter theory and competing theories in explaining local government spending. Public Choice105:207-30.
2.
Bergstrom, T.C., and R.P. Goodman.1973. Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review63:280-96.
3.
Booms, B.H.1966. City governmental form and public expenditure levels. National Tax Journal19 (2): 187-99.
4.
Borcherding, T.E., and R.T. Deacon.1972. The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review62:891-901.
5.
Brambor, T., W. Clark, and M. Golder.2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis14:63-82.
6.
Brennan, G., and J. Buchanan.1980. The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge. Cambridge Univ. Press.
7.
Brown, M.C., and C.N. Halaby.1984. Bosses, reform, and the socioeconomic bases of urban expenditure, 1890-1940. In The politics of urban fiscal policy, edited by T. J. McDonald and S. K. Ward, 69-99. Beverly Hills: Sage.
8.
Browning, R.P., D.R. Marshall, and D.H. Tabb.1984. Protest is not enough: The struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for equality in urban politics. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
9.
Buchanan, J.M.1971. Principles of urban fiscal strategy. Public Choice11:1-16.
10.
Campbell, R.J.2004. Leviathan and fiscal illusion in local government overlapping jurisdictions. Public Choice120:301-29.
11.
Clingermayer, J.C., and R.C. Feiock.2001. Institutional constraints and policy choices: An exploration of local governance. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
12.
Deno, K.T., and S.L. Mehay.1987. Municipal management structure and fiscal performance: Do city managers make a difference? Southern Economic Journal53 (3): 627-42.
13.
DiLorenzo, T.J.1983. Economic competition and political competition: An empirical note. Public Choice40:203-9.
14.
Dolan, D.A.1990. Local government fragmentation: Does it drive up the cost of government? Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (1): 28-45.
15.
Downs, A.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
16.
Eberts, R.W., and T.J. Gronberg.1990. Structure, conduct, and performance in the local public sector. National Tax Journal43 (2): 165-73.
17.
Epple, D., and A. Zelenitz.1981. The implications of competition among jurisdictions: Does Tiebout need politics? Journal of Political Economy89 (6): 1197-1217.
18.
Farnham, P.G.1987. Form of government and the median voter. Social Science Quarterly68 (3): 569-82.
19.
Farnham, P.G.1990. The impact of citizen influence on local government expenditure . Public Choice64 (3): 201-12.
20.
Feiock, R.C., M.-G. Jeong, and J. Kim.2003. Credible commitment and council-manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices. Public Administration Review63 (5): 616-25.
21.
Forbes, K.F., and E.M. Zampelli.1989. Is Leviathan a mythical beast? American Economic Review79 (3): 568-77.
22.
Frant, H.1996. High-powered and low-powered incentives in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6 (3): 365-81.
23.
Frederickson, H.G., G.A. Johnson, and C. Wood.2004. The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
24.
Hayes, K., and S. Chang.1990. The relative efficiency of city manager and mayor-council forms of government. Southern Economic Journal57 (1): 167-77.
25.
Hirschman, A.O.1970. Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
26.
Jaccard, J., R. Turrisi, and C.K. Wan.1990. Interaction effects in multiple regression . Newbury Park: Sage.
27.
Jung, C.2006. Forms of government and spending on common municipal functions: A longitudinal approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences72 (3): 363-76.
28.
Lineberry, R.L., and E.P. Fowler.1967. Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review61 (3): 701-16.
29.
Lubell, M., R.C. Feiock, and E. Ramirez.2005. Political institutions and conservation by local governments. Urban Affairs Review40 (6): 706-29.
30.
Lyons, W.1978. Reform and response in American cities: Structure and policy reconsidered. Social Science Quarterly59 (1): 118-32.
31.
Martin, D.T., and R.E. Wagner.1978. The institutional framework for municipal incorporation: An economic analysis of local agency formation commissions in California. Journal of Law and Economics21 (2): 409-25.
32.
McCabe, B.C., and R.C. Feiock.2005. Nested levels of institutions: State rules and city property taxes. Urban Affairs Review40 (5): 634-54.
33.
Miller, G.J.1992. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy . Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press .
34.
Morgan, D.R., and J.P. Pelissero.1980. Urban policy: Does political structure matter? The American Political Science Review74 (4): 999-1006.
35.
Mueller, D.C.2003. Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
36.
Nelson, M.A.1987. Searching for Leviathan: Comment and extension. American Economic Review77 (1): 198-204.
37.
Niskanen, W.A.1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.
38.
Oates, W.E.1985. Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review75 (4): 748-57.
39.
Palumbo, G.1983. City government expenditures and city government reality: A comment on Sjoquist. National Tax Journal36 (2): 249-51.
40.
Peterson, P.E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
41.
Ruhil, A.V.S.2003. Structural change and fiscal flows: A framework for analyzing the effects of urban events. Urban Affairs Review38 (3): 396-416.
42.
Schneider, Mark.1989. The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia . Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
43.
Shapiro, P., and J. Sonstelie.1982. Did Proposition 13 slay Leviathan? American Economic Review72 (2): 184-90.
44.
Sjoquist, D.L.1982. The effect of the number of local governments on central city expenditures. National Tax Journal35 (1): 79-87.
45.
Stumm, T.J., and M.T. Corrigan.1998. City managers: Do they promote fiscal efficiency? Journal of Urban Affairs20 (3): 343-51.
46.
Swanstrom, T.1988. Semisovereign cities: The politics of urban development . Polity21(1): 83-110.
47.
Tiebout, C.M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy65:416-24.
48.
Tirole, J.1988. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
Turnbull, G.K., and S.S. Djoundourian .1993. Overlapping jurisdictions: Substitutes or complements? Public Choice75:231-45.
50.
Williamson, O.1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
51.
Wittman, D.1989. Why democracies produce efficient results. Journal of Political Economy97 (6): 1395-1424.
52.
Zax, J.S.1989. Is there a Leviathan in your neighborhood? American Economic Review79 (3): 560-67.
