In this study, we use a large sample from the Beijing Household Travel Survey to build husband-wife dyads, construct variables to measure bargaining power between spouses and place intra-household travel arrangements within a broader institutional framework to analyse relationships between institutions, bargaining power and travel patterns of married men and women. The empirical results reveal that bargaining power does matter in determining intra-household commute arrangements. The overarching institutional framework meanwhile sets boundaries for bargaining, and defines which resources are effective bargaining chips for individuals.
AbrahamMNisicN (2012) A simple mobility game for couple’s migration decisions and some quasi-experimental evidence. Rationality and Society24(2): 168–197.
2.
AgarwalB (1997) ‘Bargaining’ and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics3(1): 1–51.
3.
AlbrechtSLBahrHChadwickB (1979) Changing family and sex roles: An assessment of age differences. Journal of Marriage and Family41: 41–50.
4.
AlonsoW (1964) Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BeckerGS (1981) Treatise on the Family. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BeegleKEFrankenbergEThomasD (2001) Bargaining power within couples and use of prenatal and delivery care in Indonesia. Working paper.
7.
Beijing Transportation Research Center (2011) Travel survey for the residents in Beijing. Research report.
8.
BlumenO (1994) Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geography15(3): 223–245.
9.
BrownP (2009) Dowry and intra-household bargaining: Evidence from China. Journal of Human Resources44(1): 25–46.
10.
BrunJFagnaniJ (1994) Lifestyles and locational choices–Trade-offs and compromises: A case-study of middle-class couples living in the Ile-de-France region. Urban Studies31: 921–934.
11.
ChauTWLiHBLiuPW. (2007) Testing the collective model of household labor supply: Evidence from China. China Economic Review18(4): 389–402.
12.
ChenJHGuoFWuY (2011) One decade of urban housing reform in China: Urban housing price dynamics and the role of migration and urbanization, 1995–2005. Habitat International35: 1–8.
13.
ClarkWAVKuipjers-LindeM (1994) Commuting in restructuring urban regions. Urban Studies31: 465–483.
14.
CostaDLKahnME (2000) Power couples: Changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics115(4): 1287–1315.
15.
DengLShenQYWangL (2011) The emerging housing policy framework in China. Journal of Planning Literature26(2): 168–183.
FolbreNNelsonJA (2000) For love or money–Or both. Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 123–140.
19.
FriedbergLWebbA (2006) Determinants and Consequences of Bargaining Power in Households. NBER working paper. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12367.pdf.
20.
GodwinDDScanzoniJ (1989) Couple consensus during marital joint decision-making: A context, process, outcome model. Journal of Marriage and Family51(4): 943–956.
21.
GoldinC (2006) The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review96(2): 1–21.
22.
HansonSHansonP (1980) Gender and urban activity patterns in Uppsala, Sweden. Geographical Review70: 291–299.
23.
HansonSJohnstonI (1985) Gender differences in work-trip length: Explanations and implications. Urban Geography6(3): 193–219.
24.
HansonSPrattG (1990) Geographic perspectives on the occupational segregation of women. National Geographic Research6(4): 376–399.
25.
HoddinottJHaddadL (1995) Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Cote D’Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics57(1): 77–96.
26.
JohnsonNLKotzSBalakrishnanN (1995) Continuous Univariate Distributions. Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.
27.
Johnston-AnumonwoI (1992) The influence of household type on gender differences in work trip distance. Professional Geographer44(2): 161–169.
28.
LiLXWuXY (2011) Gender of children, bargaining power, and intra-household resource allocation in China. Journal of Human Resources46(2): 295–316.
29.
LigonE (2002) Dynamic Bargaining in Households (with application to Bangladesh). CUDARE Working Paper Series 972, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy, University of California at Berkeley, USA.
30.
LundbergSPollakR (2003) Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household1(3): 153–167.
31.
McDonaldGW (1980) Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and Family42(4): 841–854.
32.
McLaffertySPrestonV (1991) Gender, race, and commuting among service sector workers. The Professional Geographer43(1): 1–15.
33.
MaddenJF (1981) Why women work close to home. Urban Studies18: 181–194.
34.
ManningWGMullahyJ (2001) Estimating log models: To transform or not to transform?Journal of Health Economics20(4): 461–494.
35.
ManningWGBasuAMullahyJ (2005) Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. Journal of Health Economics24(3): 465–488.
36.
MichelsonW (1988) Divergent convergence: The daily routines of employed spouses as a public affairs agenda. In: AndrewCMilroyBM (eds) Life Spaces: Gender, Household, Employment. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 81–101.
PinchSPStoreyA (1992) Labour-market dualism: Evidence from a survey of households in the Southampton city-region. Environment and Planning A24(4): 571–589.
39.
PrattGHansonS (1991) Time, space, and the occupational segregation of women: A critique of Human Capital Theory. Geoforum22: 149–157.
40.
QuigleyJMWeinbergDH (1977) Intro-urban residential mobility: A review and synthesis. International Regional Science Review2: 41–66.
41.
QuisumbingAMaluccioJ (2003) Resources at marriage and intra-household allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics65(3): 283–328.
42.
RaiS (1994) Gender issues in China: A survey. Journal of China Report30(4): 407–420.
43.
RobinsonJC (1985) Of women and washing machines: Employment, housework, and the reproduction of motherhood in socialist China. The China Quarterly101: 32–57.
44.
RobinsonJP (1988) Who’s doing the housework?American Demographics10(12): 24–28.
45.
SchultzP (1990) Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of Human Resources25(4): 599–634.
46.
SenA (1987) Gender and Cooperative Conflicts. WIDER working papers.
47.
SheltonBADaphneJ (1993) Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues14(3): 401–420.
48.
SunTSWangLLLiGP (2012) Distributions of population and employment, and evolution of spatial structures in the Beijing Metropolitan Area. Acta Geographica Sinica67(6): 829–840. [In Chinese].
49.
ThomasD (1990) Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. The Journal of Human Resources25(4): 635–664.
50.
ThomasDContrerasDFrankenburgE (1997) Distribution of Power Within the Household and Child Health. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
51.
TurnerTNiemeierD (1997) Travel to work and household responsibility: New evidence. Transportation24: 397–419.
WangYPMurieA (1996) The process of commercialisation of urban housing in China. Urban Studies33: 971–989.
54.
WarnerRLLeeGRLeeJ (1986) Social organization, spousal resources, and marital power: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Marriage and Family48(1): 121–128.
55.
WolfM (1985) Revolution Postponed: Women in Contemporary China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
YuGH (2011) The Development of the Chinese Legal System: Change and Challenges. New York: Routledge.
57.
ZhangJSChanW (1999) Dowry and wife’s welfare: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy107(4): 786–808.
58.
ZhuoDQ (1999) Research on residential property division after divorce. Zhongshan University Law Review1: 224–230. [In Chinese].
