Liberal expansionism is the dominant approach to addressing the problems of American cities. This approach combines liberal political philosophy with the idea that these problems can be solved only by creating linkages between cities and resources beyond their boundaries. The case for liberal expansionism derives from the shaming of the inside game—a critique of community development and the progressive capacities of cities themselves. I develop a countercritique of this notion. I find that much of it is unjustified by empirical evidence, and instead, results from ideological bias. This conclusion suggests that the dominance of liberal expansionism be questioned.
Alperovitz, G.2005. America beyond capitalism. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2.
Barnekov, T., and D. Rich. 1989. Privatism and the limits of local economic development policy. Urban Affairs Quarterly25: 212-238.
3.
Berger, J.2005. Goodbye South Bronx blight, hello trendy SoBro. New York Times, June 24.
4.
Bernstein, R.1976. Restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Bollens, S. A.1997. Concentrated poverty and metropolitan equity strategies. Stanford Law and Policy Review8(2): 11-24.
6.
Bollens, S. A.2003. In through the back door. Housing Policy Debate13(4): 631-657.
7.
Bruyn, S. T., and J. Meehan, eds. 1987. Beyond the market and the state: New directions in community economic development. Philadelphia: Temple Univ Press..
8.
Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. 2002. Beyond merger: A competitive vision for the regional city of Louisville. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9.
Clarke, S. E., and G. L. Gaile.1998. The work of cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
10.
Clavel, P.1986. The progressive city: Planning and participation, 1969-1984. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
11.
Clavel, P., and C. Kleniewski. 1990. Space for progressive local policy: Examples from the U.S. and U.K. In Beyond the city limits, edited by J. Logan and T. Swanstrom, 199-236. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
12.
Clavel, P., and W. Wiewel. 1991. Introduction. In Harold Washington and the neighborhoods: Progressive city government in Chicago, 1983-1987, edited by P. Clavel and W. Wiewel, 1-33. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
13.
Cohen, J., and J. Rogers. 1995. After liberalism. Boston Review April/May. Retrieved from www.bostonreview.net/BR20.2/CohenRogers.html.
14.
Davies, J.2002. Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs24: 1-17.
15.
DeFilippis, J.2004. Unmaking Goliath: community control in the face of global capital. New York: Routledge.
16.
Dreier, P. J., J. H. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanstrom. 2001. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
17.
Dreier, P. J., J. H. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanstrom. 2004. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. 2nd ed., revised. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18.
Elkin, Stephen L.1987. City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
19.
Fainstein, N., and S. Fainstein. 1983. Regime strategies, communal resistance, and economic forces. In Restructuring the city, edited by Susan. Fainsteinet al., 245-282. White Plains, NY: Longman.
20.
Florida, R.2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Frug, G. E.1980. The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Review93: 1059-1154.
22.
Gainsborough, J. F.2001. Fenced off: The suburbanization of American politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
23.
Ganz, A.1986. Where has the urban crisis gone? In Cities in stress, edited by M. Gottdiener, 39-58. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Garber, J. A.1990. Law and the possibilities for a just political economy. Journal of Urban Affairs12: 1-15.
25.
Goering, J., and J. D. Feins, eds. 2003. Choosing a better life: Evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
26.
Goetz, E. G.1990. Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly25: 170-190.
27.
Goetz, E. G.2003. Clearing the way. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
28.
Greenblatt, A.2002. Anatomy of a merger. Governing MagazineDecember: 20-25.
Gunn, C., and H. D. Gunn.1991. Reclaiming capital: Democratic initiatives and community development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
31.
Haveman, R. H., ed. 1977. A decade of federal antipoverty programs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32.
Heilbroner, R.1988. Behind the veil of economics. New York: Norton.
33.
Henig, J. R.1992. Defining city limits. Urban Affairs Quarterly27: 375-395.
34.
Hill, R. C.1983. Crisis in the motor city. In Restructuring the city, edited by Susan Fainstein et al., 80-125. White Plains, NY: Longman.
35.
Imbroscio, David L.1997. Reconstructing city politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Imbroscio, David L.1998. Reformulating urban regime theory: The division of labor between state and market reconsidered. Journal of Urban Affairs20: 233-248.
37.
Imbroscio, David L.1999. Structure, agency, and democratic theory. Polity32(1): 45-66.
38.
Judd, D. R.2005. Everything is always going to hell: Urban scholars as end-time prophets. Urban Affairs Review41: 119-131.
39.
Kanter, R. M.1995. World class: Thriving locally in the global economy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
Kantor, P.1995. The dependent city revisited. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41.
Kantor, P.2000. Can regionalism save poor cities? Urban Affairs Review35(6): 794-820.
Katz, B., and M. Muro. 2005. Distinctive, equitable, competitive. The Courier-Journal, January 23.
44.
Katz, B., and M. Turner. 2001. Who should run the housing voucher program? Housing Policy Debate12(2): 239-262.
45.
Krumholz, N.1991. Equity and local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly5: 291-300.
46.
Lasch, C.1991. The true and only heaven. New York: Norton.
47.
Leitner, H., and M. Garner. 1993. The limits of local initiatives: A reassessment of urban entrepreneurialism for urban development. Urban Geography14: 57-77.
48.
Lemann, N.1991. The promised land. New York: Vintage.
49.
Lemann, N.1994. The myth of community development. New York Times Magazine, January 9.
50.
Logan, J. R., and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
51.
Marquez, B.1993. Mexican American community development corporations and the limits of directed capitalism. Economic Development Quarterly7: 287-295.
52.
Mier, R., and J. Fitzgerald. 1991. Managing economic development. Economic Development Quarterly5: 268-279.
53.
O’Connor, A.1999. Swimming against the tide: A brief history of federal policy in poor communities. In Urban Problems and Community Development, edited by R. Ferguson and W. Dickens, 77-138. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Orfield, M.2002. American metropolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
56.
Peirce, N.2004. Louisville’s metro: So far, a major success. Washington Post Writers Group, April 25. Retrieved from www.postwritersgroup.com/archives/peir0419.htm
57.
Peirce, N. R., and C. Steinbach. 1987. Corrective capitalism: The rise of America’s community development corporations. New York: Ford Foundation.
58.
Peterson, P.1981. City limits. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
59.
Rast, J.1999. Remaking Chicago: The political origins of industrial change. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois Press.
60.
Reed, Adolph Jr.1988. The Black urban regime: Structural origins and constraints. In Power, community, and the city, vol. 1 of Comparative urban and community research, edited by Michael Peter Smith, 138-189. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
61.
Riposa, G., and G. Andranovich. 1988. Economic development policy: Whose interests are being served? Urban Resources5: 25-34, 42-42.
62.
Rusk, D.1993. Cities without suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson.
Savitch, H. V., and R. K. Vogel.2000. Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. State and Local Government Review32(3): 198-212.
65.
Savitch, H. V., and R. K. Vogel.2004. Suburbs without a city: Power and city-county consolidation. Urban Affairs Review39: 758-790.
66.
Shipp, S.1996. The road not taken: Alternative strategies for Black economic development in the United States. Journal of Economic Issues30(1): 79-95.
67.
Shuman, M.1998. Going local: Creating self-reliant communities in a global age. New York: Free Press.
68.
Squires, G. D., ed. 1989. Unequal partnerships: The political economy of urban redevelopment in postwar America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
69.
Stoecker, R.1997. The CDC model of urban development: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs19: 1-21.
70.
Stone, C. N.1987. The study of the politics of urban development. In The politics of urban development, edited by C. Stone and H. Sanders, 3-22. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
71.
Stone, C. N.1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
72.
Stone, C., K. Doherty, C. Jones, and T. Ross. 1999. Schools and disadvantaged neighborhoods. In Urban problems and community development, edited by R. Ferguson and W. Dickens, 339-380. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
73.
Swanstrom, T.1988. Semisovereign cities: The politics of urban development. Polity21: 83-110.
74.
Swanstrom, T.1993. Beyond economism: Urban political economy and the postmodern challenge. Journal of Urban Affairs15: 55-78.
75.
Swinney, D.1998. Building a bridge to the high road. Paper from the Center for Labor and Community Research. Available at www.clcr.org.
76.
Thompson, J. P.1998. Universalism and deconcentration: Why race still matters in poverty and economic development. Politics and Society26(2): 181-219.
77.
Thompson, J. P.2002. Review of Place matters. Urban Affairs Review37: 446-448.
78.
Turner, M. A.1998. Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate9(2): 373-394.
79.
Vidal, A. C.1992. Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. New York: Community Development Research Center, Graduate School of Management and Urban Policy, New School for Social Research.
80.
Walzer, M.1990. The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory18: 6-23.
81.
Weiher, G. R.1989. Rumors of the demise of the urban crisis are greatly exaggerated. Journal of Urban Affairs11: 225-242.
82.
Weir, M.2000. Coalition building for regionalism. In Reflections on regionalism, edited by B. Katz, 127-153. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
83.
Weir, M., H. Wolman, and T. Swanstrom. 2005. The calculus of coalitions: Cities, suburbs, and the metropolitan agenda. Urban Affairs Review40: 730-760.
84.
Wilson, W. J.1996. When work disappears. New York: Knopf.
85.
Williamson, T., D. Imbroscio, and G. Alperovitz. 2002. Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era. New York: Routledge.
