The new institutionalism concentrates on the nature and effects of rules, and intergovernmental relations on the levels of government. This article integrates these foci to present a model of nested institutions and levels of government, focusing on constitutional and substantive rules of governance in states and municipalities. The authors contend that cities’ constitutional rules (specifically their governance arrangements) shape local actors’ incentives and influence their implementation of state mandates. They argue further that the mere presence—not the actual evocation—of these rules casts a shadow that defines the actors’ decision space and that broad distinctions among laws have profound implications for the actors’ choices. They support this explanation by empirically testing propositions derived from the framework regarding property tax dependence in large cities between 1975 and 1995.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1976–1995. Significant features of fiscal federalism. Annual series. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Baird, D. G., R. H. Gerner, and R. C. Picker. 1995. Game theory and the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
3.
Banfield, E., and J. Q. Wilson. 1963. City politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
4.
Beck, N., and J. Katz. 1996. Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series cross-section models. Political Analysis6:1–34.
5.
Berry, C. 2002. Imperfect union: Fiscal externalities in multi-level governments. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Chicago, Department of Political Science.
6.
Brennan, G., and J. Buchanan. 1980. The power to tax. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
7.
Chicoine, D. L., N. Walzer, and S. C. Deller. 1989. Representative vs. direct democracy and government spending in a median voter model. Public Finance/Finances Publique44 (2): 225 – 36.
8.
Chubb, J. E.1985. The political economy of federalism. American Political Science Review79:994–1015.
9.
Clingermayer, J. C., and R. C. Feiock. 2001. Institutional constraints and policy choice: An exploration of local governance. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
10.
Cooter, R., S. Marks, and R. Mnookin. 1982. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: A testable model of strategic behavior. Journal of Legal Studies11:225–251.
11.
Dye, R. F., and T. J. McGuire. 1997. The effect of property tax limitation measures on local government fiscal behavior. Journal of Public Economics66:469–487.
12.
Feiock, R. C., and J. Kim. 2001. Form of government, administrative organization and local economic development policy. Journal of Public Administration and Theory11 (1): 29–50.
13.
Fischel, W. A. 2000. Municipal corporations, homeowners, and the benefit view of the property tax. Paper prepared for the conference on Property Taxation and Local Government Finance sponsored by the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, Paradise Valley, Arizona, 16–18, January.
14.
Fisher, G. W.1996. The worst tax? A history of the property tax in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
15.
Frant, H.1993. Rules and governance in the public sector: The case of civil service. American Journal of Political Science37:990–1007.
16.
Frant, H.1996. High-powered and low-powered incentives in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration and Theory6:365–381.
17.
Gujarati, D. N.1995. Basic econometrics. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hamilton, B.1975. Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments. Urban Studies12:205–211.
19.
Harden, G.1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science162:1243–1248.
20.
Heckathorn, D. D., and S. M. Maser. 1987. Bargaining and constitutional contracts. American Journal of Political Science31:142–168.
21.
International City/Council Management Association. 1975–1996. Municipal yearbook. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Jacob, H.1992. The elusive shadow of the law. Law & Society26:565–590.
23.
Joyce, P. G., and D. R. Mullins. 1991. The changing structure of the state and local sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Administration Review51:240–253.
24.
Kennan, J., and R. Wilson. 1993. Bargaining with private information: Bargaining data?Journal of Economic Literature31:45–104.
25.
Knott, J. H., and G. J. Miller. 1987. Reforming bureaucracy: The politics of institutional choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
Krane, D., P. Rigos, and M. Hill. 2001. Home rule in America. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
27.
Lineberry, R. L., and E. Fowler. 1967. Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review61:701–716.
28.
Lowery, D.1983. Limitations on taxing and spending powers: An assessment of their effectiveness. Social Science Quarterly63:247–263.
29.
Lowery, D.1985. Public opinion, fiscal illusion, and tax revolution: The political demise of the property tax. Public Budgeting & Finance5 (Autumn): 76–88.
30.
Lowery, D.1986. After the tax revolt: Some positive, if unintended, consequences. Social Science Quarterly66:736–750.
31.
Main, B. G., and A. Park. 2000. The British and American rules: An experimental examination of pre-trial bargaining in the shadow of the law. Scottish Journal of Political Economy47:37 – 60.
32.
Maser, S. M.1985. Demographic factors affecting constitutional decisions: The case of municipal charters. Public Choice47:121–162.
33.
Maser, S. M.1998. Constitutions as relational contracts: Explaining procedural safeguards in municipal charters. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8:527–564.
34.
McCabe, B. Coyle. 2000. State institutions and city property taxes: Revisiting the effects of the tax revolt. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management12:205–229.
35.
McGuire, T. J.1999. Proposition 13 and its offspring: For good or evil?National Tax Journal52:129–138.
36.
Mikesell, J. L.1999. Fiscal administration. 5th ed.New York: Harcourt Brace.
37.
Miller, G.1985. Progressive reform and induced institutional preferences. Public Choice47:163–181.
38.
Mnookin, R. H., and L. Kornhauser. 1979. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal88:950–997.
39.
Mullins, D. R., and K. Cox. 1995. Tax and expenditure limits on local governments. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
40.
Oates, W. E.1985. Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. Economic Review75:748–757.
41.
Olson, M.1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
42.
Ostrom, E.1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
43.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr.1993. American intergovernmental relations: An overview. 2nd ed. In American intergovernmental relations: Foundations, perspectives and issues, edited by Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., 1–32. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
44.
Poterba, J. M., and K. S. Rueben. 1995. The effect of property-tax limits on wages and employment in the local public sector. American Economic Review85:384–389.
45.
Preston, A. E., and C. Ichniowski. 1991. A national perspective on the nature and effects of the local property tax revolt 1976–1986. National Tax Journal44:123–145.
46.
Ruhill, A. 1999. Institutional reform in local government: An event history analysis. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, 3 – 7, September.
47.
Shadbegian, R.1998. Do tax and expenditure limitations affect local government budgets? Evidence from panel data. Public Finance Review26:218–236.
48.
Shadbegian, R.1999. The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on the revenue structure of local government 1962–1987. National Tax Journal52:221–237.
49.
Shapiro, P., and J. Sonstelie. 1982. Did proposition 13 slay Leviathan?The American Economic Review72 (2): 184–190.
50.
Shariff, K. Z.2003. Designing institutions to manage conflict: Principles for the problem solving organization. Harvard Negotiation Law Review8:133-133.
51.
Sharp, E. B.1997. A comparative anatomy of urban social conflict. Political Research Quarterly50 (2): 261–280.
52.
Spier, K.1992. The dynamics of pretrial negotiation. Review of Economic Studies59:93–108.
53.
Tiebout, C. M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416 – 24.
54.
U. S. Census Bureau. 1977–2000. County city data book. Washington, DC: Author.
55.
Wright, D.1988. Understanding intergovernmental relations. 3rd ed.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
