Using mixed methods, we explored rates and correlates of sexual coercion (SC) in 137 men remanded to a batterer treatment program. Participants completed the 37-item Multidimensional Sexual Coercion (MSCQ) scale in a detailed assessment of their use of sexually coercive tactics during their current or most recent intimate relationship. Fifty-six participants engaged in some form of SC, and of those, about one-quarter did so more than twenty times. The current study reframes SC as an abusive dynamic that leverages privileged history within the relationship and examines its role in overall coercive control while exploring identification methods.
Bagwell-GrayM. E.MessingJ. T.Baldwin-WhiteA. (2015). Intimate partner sexual violence: A review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014557290
3.
BanyardV. L. (2014). Improving college campus–based prevention of violence against women: A strategic plan for research built on multipronged practices and policies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521027
4.
BarbaroL.RaghavanC. (2018). Patterns in coercive controlling behaviors among men mandated for batterer treatment: Denial, minimization, and consistency of tactics across relationships. Partner Abuse, 9(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.9.3.270
BavréA.JanssenE. (2025). Predicting the use of sexually coercive strategies in young heterosexual men: Combining the dual control model with the confluence model. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 54(9), 3471–3484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03256-6
7.
BeckC. J. A.RaghavanC. (2010). Intimate partner abuse screening in custody mediation: The importance of assessing coercive control. Family Court Review, 48(3), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01329.x
8.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.StevensM. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf
9.
BouffardL.GoodsonA. (2017). Sexual coercion, sexual aggression, or sexual assault: How measurement impacts our understanding of sexual violence. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-05-2017-0292
CampbellJ. L.QuincyC.OssermanJ.PedersenO. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semi-structured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
12.
CampbellR.DworkinE.CabralG. (2009). An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women's mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334456
da SilvaA. R. (2017). Tools for biometry and applied statistics in agricultural science. The comprehensive R archive network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
18.
DegueS.DiLilloD. (2004). Understanding perpetrators of nonphysical sexual coercion: Characteristics of those who cross the line. Violence and Victims, 19(6), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.6.673.66345
19.
DelaneyA. X. (2021). Intersections of childhood victimization experiences, gender, and dominance: The makings for sexual coercion transnationally?International Criminal Justice Review, 31(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567720982655
20.
DiMarcoD.McDonoughC.SavitzR. (2024). Rates of male sexual coercion: Comparison with female rates, and comparison between sexual orientations. Sexuality & Culture, 28(3), 950–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10157-0
21.
DouadiM.BrassardA.GodboutN.SavardC.DaspeMÈLafontaineM. F.PéloquinK. (2024). Romantic attachment and intimate partner violence perpetrated by men: The role of affect dysregulation and gender hostility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(11-12), 2437–2459. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231218226
22.
DugalC.BrassardA.ClaingA.LefebvreA. A.AudetA.Paradis-LavalléeR.GodboutN.PéloquinK. (2021). Attachment insecurities and sexual coercion in same-and cross-gender couples: The mediational role of couple communication patterns. Journal of sex & Marital Therapy, 47(8), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1944937
23.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6
24.
EnnisL.ToopC.JungS.BoisS. (2017). Instrumental and reactive intimate partner violence: Offender characteristics, reoffense rates, and risk management. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 4(2), 61–76. https://doi/10.1037/tam0000080https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000080
25.
Fernández-FuertesA. A.CarcedoR. J.OrgazB.FuertesA. (2018). Sexual coercion perpetration and victimization: Gender similarities and differences in adolescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(16), 2467–2485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518774306
GarnerA. R.SpillerL. C.WilliamsP. (2020). Sexual coercion in the college population: A form of risk-taking behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23-24), 5276–5291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517720736
28.
GaveyN. (1999). “I wasn’t raped, but…”: Revisiting definitional problems in sexual victimization. In LambS. (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 57–81). New York University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.13944153
29.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
30.
GoetzA. T.ShackelfordT. K. (2010). Sexual coercion in intimate relationships scale. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, & W. L. Yarber. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 125–127). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183169
31.
HelfritzL. E.StanfordM. S.ConklinS. M.GreveK. W.Villemarette-PittmanN. R.HoustonR. J. (2006). Usefulness of self-report instruments in assessing men accused of domestic violence. The Psychological Record, 56(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395542
32.
HolmgreenL.OswaldD. L. (2017). Men’s sexual coerciveness, perceptions of women's attachment, and dating preferences. Violence and Victims, 32(5), 935–952. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00133
33.
JeffreyN. K.BarataP. C. (2021). Intimate partner sexual violence among Canadian university students: Incidence, context, and perpetrators’ perceptions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 2123–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02006-8
34.
KatzJ.MyhrL. (2008). Perceived conflict patterns and relationship quality associated with verbal sexual coercion by male dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(6), 798–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313949
35.
KeenerE.ReichertA.KhalaifaM.HenryS.WilsoncroftK. (2025). Power over women: Unmasking toxic masculinity's role in understanding sexual violence in college athletes. Gender Issues, 42(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-025-09353-z
36.
KorkmazS.GöksülükD.ZararsizG. (2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2014-031
37.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.UllmanS.WestC.WhiteJ. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
38.
LehmannP.SimmonsC. A.PillaiV. K. (2012). The validation of the checklist of controlling behaviors (CCB): Assessing coercive control in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 18(8), 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212456522
39.
LeSuerW. (2020). An international study of the contextual effects of gender inequality on intimate partner sexual violence against women students. Feminist Criminology, 15(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085119842652
40.
LittletonH. L.RhatiganD. L.AxsomD. (2007). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden rape victim?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 14(4), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v14n04_04
41.
LovelandJ. E.RaghavanC. (2017). Coercive control, physical violence, and masculinity. Violence and Gender, 4(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2016.0019
42.
MalamuthN. M.LinzD.HeaveyC. L.BarnesG.AckerM. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.353
43.
MarshallE. A. (2024). Pornography use and sexual coercion: Examining the importance of frequency, type, and other factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(23-24), 5056–5077. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241246007
44.
MessingJ. T.ThallerJ.BagwellM. (2014). Factors related to sexual abuse and forced sex in a sample of women experiencing police-involved intimate partner violence. Health & Social Work, 39(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlu026
45.
MitchellJ. E.RaghavanC. (2021). The impact of coercive control on use of specific sexual coercion tactics. Violence Against Women, 27(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219884127
46.
MonsonC. M.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.BinderupT. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”?: Attributions about date and marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1156–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626000015011003
47.
Murphy-OikonenJ.McQueenK.MillerA.ChambersL.HiebertA. (2022). Unfounded sexual assault: Women’s experiences of not being believed by the police. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(11-12), NP8916–NP8940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520978190
48.
O'sullivanL. F. (2005). Sexual coercion in dating relationships: Conceptual and methodological issues. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990500037246
49.
PomerantzJ. B.CohenS. J.DoychakK.RaghavanC. (2021). Linguistic indicators of coercive control: Evidenced in sex trafficking narratives. Violence and Gender, 8(4), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2020.0105
50.
PughB.BeckerP. (2018). Exploring definitions and prevalence of verbal sexual coercion and its relationship to consent to unwanted sex: Implications for affirmative consent standards on college campuses. Behavioral Sciences, 8(8), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8080069
51.
RaghavanC.BeckC. J.MenkeJ. M.LovelandJ. E. (2019). Coercive controlling behaviors in intimate partner violence in male same-sex relationships: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 31(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2019.1616643
52.
RaghavanC.CohenS.TamborraT. (2015). Development and preliminary validation of The Multidimensional Sexual Coercion Questionnaire (MSCQ). Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.917341
53.
RaghavanC.DoychakK. (2025). Assessing coercive control in forensic settings: A review of the development and application of the brief interview of coercive control (BICC). Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2025.2551643
54.
RauerA. J.PettitG. S.LansfordJ. E.BatesJ. E.DodgeK. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2159–2171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031845
55.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
56.
ReichertJ.WielingaF. E.OlverM. E. (2025). Under pressure: Identifying pathways to sexual coercion in a community sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2025.2487917
57.
ShackelfordT. K.GoetzA. T. (2004). Men’s sexual coercion in intimate relationships: Development and initial validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.5.541.63681
58.
ShotlandR. L.GoodsteinL. (1992). Sexual precedence reduces the perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal: An examination of attributions concerning date rape and consensual sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186012
StarrattV. G.GoetzA. T.ShackelfordT. K.McKibbinW. F.Stewart-WilliamsS. (2008). Men’s partner-directed insults and sexual coercion in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 23(5), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9153-z
61.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS. U. E.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
62.
Thapar-BjörkertS.MorganK. J. (2010). “But sometimes I think . . . they put themselves in the situation”: Exploring blame and responsibility in interpersonal violence. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209354374
63.
Thiel de BocanegraH.RostovtsevaD. P.KheraS.GodhwaniN. (2010). Birth control sabotage and forced sex: Experiences reported by women in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women, 16(5), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210366965
64.
WaldnerL. K.Vaden-GoadL.SikkaA. (1999). Sexual coercion in India: An exploratory analysis using demographic variables. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018717216774
65.
WalfishS. (2006). A review of statistical outlier methods. Pharmaceutical Technology, 30(11), 82–88.
66.
WardC. (1988). The attitudes toward rape victims scale: Construction, validation, and cross-cultural applicability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00932.x
67.
WebsterK.DiemerK.HoneyN.MannixS.MickleJ.MorganJ.ParkesA.PolitoffV.PowellA.StubbsJ.WardA. (2018). Australians’ attitudes to violence against women and gender equality: Findings from the 2017 national community attitudes towards violence against women survey (NCAS). ANROWS. https://20ian81kynqg38bl3l3eh8bf-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/anr001-NCAS-report-WEB-1019.pdf.
68.
WeiserD. A. (2017). Confronting myths about sexual assault: A feminist analysis of the false report literature. Family Relations, 66(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12235
69.
WidmanL.OlsonM. A.BolenR. M. (2013). Self-reported sexual assault in convicted sex offenders and community men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1519–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468237
70.
WilsonL. C.MillerK. E. (2016). Meta-Analysis of the prevalence of unacknowledged rape. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015576391
71.
WingoodG. M.DiClementeR. J. (1997). The effects of an abusive primary partner on the condom use and sexual negotiation practices of African-American women. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 1016–1018. https://doi.org/10.2105%2Fajph.87.6.1016
