Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social media serves as a dual-edged sword, by both fostering resistance and enabling the dissemination of nationalist ideologies through femicide issues. However, there is minimal research on how nationalist parties in Europe shape representations of femicide. This study used a quantitative analysis on femicide representations on X and Facebook-posts across Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey. Findings indicate that countries with higher nationalist and populist party votes during national parliamentary elections had more interactions, negative sentiments, and new social movements in femicide-related posts, underscoring the potential influence of populist political entities on femicide debates.

Keywords

femicide social media populism nationalism femonationalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akalin

Ayhan

(2022). Intimate partner violence against women in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1949764

Aldrete

M. G.

Fernández-Ardèvol

(2023). Framing femicide in the news, a paradoxical story: A comprehensive analysis of thematic and episodic frames. Crime, Media, Culture, 20(30), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590231199771

Al Jazeera Staff. (2023, May 14). Turkey election results 2023 by the numbers. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/5/14/follow-the-vote-turkey-election-results-2023

Bartlett

Birdwell

McDonnell

(2012). Populism in Europe: Lega Nord. Demos.

Baş

Ogan

C. L.

(2020). Use of social media in the struggle surrounding violence against Turkish women. International Journal of Communication, 14(2020), 5556–5574.

Baş

Ogan

C. L.

Varol

(2022). The role of legacy media and social media in increasing public engagement about violence against women in Turkey. Social Media + Society, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221138939

Bennett

W. L.

Segerberg

(2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Bernal-Triviño

Sanz-Martos

(2020). Las Periodistas Paramos in Spain: Professional, feminist internet activism. European Journal of Communication, 35(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903687

Betz

(2013). Mosques, Minarets, Burqas and other essential threats: The populist right’s campaign against Islam in Western Europe. In Wodak

KhosraviNik

Mral

(Eds.), Right-Wing populism in Europe (pp. 71–88). Bloomsbury.

10.

Bouzerdan

Whitten-Woodring

(2018). Killings in context: An analysis of the news framing of femicide. Human Rights Review, 19(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0497-3

11.

Cayli Messina

(2022). Breaking the silence on femicide: How women challenge epistemic injustice and male violence. The British Journal of Sociology, 73(4), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12968

12.

Corradi

Baldry

A. C.

Buran

Kouta

Schröttle

Stevkovic

(2018). Exploring the data on femicide across Europe. In Weil

Corradi

Naudi

(Eds.), Femicide across Europe: Theory, research and prevention (pp. 93–166). Policy Press.

13.

Council of Europe. (2024). Key facts about the Istanbul convention. https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/key-facts

14.

Crawley

(2021). Gender, ‘refugee women’ and the politics of protection. In Mora

Piper

(Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Migration (pp. 359–372). Springer International Publishing.

15.

Dagi

(2008). Islamist parties and democracy: Turkey’s AKP in power. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0015

16.

Darakchi, S. (2019). “The western feminists want to make us gay”: Nationalism, heteronormativity, and violence against women in Bulgaria in times of “anti–gender campaigns”. Sexuality & Culture, 23(10), 1208–1229.

17.

Della Porta

Mosca

(2025). Global-net for global movements? A network for networks for a movements of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 165–190.

18.

Donà

(2021). Radical right populism and the backlash against gender equality: The case of the Lega (Nord). Contemporary Italian Politics, 13(3), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2021.1947629

19.

EOF. (n.d). EOF country groups and observatories. https://eof.cut.ac.cy/?page_id=19

20.

Ernst

Blassnig

Engesser

Büchel

Esser

(2019). Populists prefer social media over talk shows: An analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across six countries. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358

21.

European Institute for Gender Equality. (2021a). Providing justice to victims of femicide: country factsheets. https://eige.europa.eu/areas/providing-justice-victims-femicide-countryfactsheets?overridden_route_name=entity.taxonomy_term.canonical&base_route_name=entity.taxonomy_term.canonical&page_manager_page=taxonomy_term_view&page_manager_page_variant=taxonomy_term_view-block_display-0&page_manager_page_variant_weight=0

22.

European Institute for Gender Equality. (2021b). Measuring femicide in Spain. https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/20211586_mh0221352enn_pdf.pdf

23.

European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2025). Annual number of [female and total] victims of [intimate partner/domestic/any] [femicide/homicide], as recorded by the police. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/indicator/genvio_int_adm_ipv__eige_ipv_victfem/map/year:2022/geo:BE,BG,CZ,DK,DE,EE,IE,EL,ES,FR,HR,IT,CY,LV,LT,LU,HU,MT,NL,AT,PL,PT,RO,SI,SK,FI,SE/type_vio:ANY_H/sex_vic:F/unit:NR

24.

Fairbairn, J. (2020). Before #MeToo: Violence against women social media work, bystander intervention, and social change. Societies, 10(3), 51. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/51 https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10030051

25.

Fairbairn, J., Boyd, C., Jiwani, Y., & Dawson, M. (2023). Changing media representations of femicide as primary prevention. In Dawson

Vega

S. M.

(Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook on Femicide and Feminicide (1st ed, pp. 554–564). Routledge.

26.

Farris

S. R.

(2017). In the name of women's rights: The rise of femonationalism. Duke University Press.

27.

FEM-UnitED. (n.d.). Launch of comparative report on femicide in 5 European countries. https://medinstgenderstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FEM-UNITED_Press-Release_Comparative-Report-Launch.pdf

28.

Fitz-Gibbon, K., Walklate, S., McCulloch, J., & Maher, J. (2023). Intimate femicide/intimate partner femicide. In The Routledge International Handbook on Femicide and Feminicide (pp. 301–310). Routledge.

29.

Gillespie, L. K., Richards, T. N., Givens, E. M., & Smith, M. D. (2013). Framing deadly domestic violence: Why the media's spin matters in newspaper coverage of femicide. Violence Against Women, 19(2), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213476457

30.

Giorgi

Loner

(2022). Populist female MPs and the discourse around gender and gender-based violence in the Italian Twittersphere during the pandemic. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(1), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac043

31.

Grzyb

Naudi

Marcuello-Servós

(2018). Femicide definitions. In Weil

Corradi

Naudi

(Eds.), Femicide across Europe: Theory, research and prevention (pp. 93–166). Policy Press.

32.

Hájek

(2017). Left, right, left, right… centre: Ideological position of Andrej Babiš’s ANO. Czech Journal of Political Science, 24(3), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2017-3-275

33.

Hernández

(2017). “Killed out of love”: A frame analysis of domestic violence coverage in Hong Kong. Violence Against Women, 24(12), 1454–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217738581

34.

Kamenova

Pingaud

(2017). Anti-migration and Islamophobia: Web populism and targeting the “easiest other”. In Pajnik

Sauer

(Eds.), Populism and the web: Communicative practices of parties and movements in Europe (pp. 108–121). Routledge.

35.

Kantola

Lombardo

(2020). Strategies of right populists in opposing gender equality in a polarized European parliament. International Political Science Review, 42(5), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120963953

36.

Karakasi, M. V., Nikolaidis, I., Fotou, E., Kyriakou, M. S., Voultsos, P., & Pavlidis, P. (2022). Femicide in Greece: A phenomenon on the rise. Forensic Science Review, 34(2), 83–87.

37.

Kassam

(2021). Spain says it is first in Europe to officially count all femicides. The Guardian, 1. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/31/spain-says-it-is-first-in-europe-to-officially-count-all-femicides .

38.

Kaya

Tecmen

(2021). Europe versus Islam?: Right-wing populist discourse and the construction of a civilizational identity. In Haynes

(Ed.), A quarter century of the “clash of civilizations” (pp. 49–64). Routledge.

39.

Köttig

Bitzan

Petö

(2017). Gender and far right politics in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

40.

Krämer

(2017). Populist online practices: The function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520

41.

Kruikemeier, S., Van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & De Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837

42.

Lloyd

(2020). Examining domestic violence and abuse in mainstream and social media: Representations and responses. In Ramon

Lloyd

Penhale

(Eds.), Gendered domestic violence and abuse in popular culture (pp. 33–60). Emerald Publishing.

43.

Lokot

(2018). #IAmNotAfraidToSayIt: Stories of sexual violence as everyday political speech on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 802–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1430161

44.

Luengo

(2018). Gender violence: The media, civil society, and the struggle for human rights in Argentina. Media, Culture & Society, 40(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717713259

45.

Mayer

Ajanović

Sauer

(2014). Intersections and inconsistencies. Framing gender in right-wing populist discourses in Austria. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(4), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2014.964309

46.

Murat

(2018). News media consolidation and censorship in Turkey: From liberal ideals to corporatist realities. Mediterranean Quarterly, 29(3), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-7003180, https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/704547

47.

Oliver

Poyrazlar

(2023). Erdoğan leads the way into 2nd-round clash as rival disappoints in Turkish election. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/turkish-election-turkey-istanbul-ankara-erdogan-vote-count-high/

48.

Oztig

L. I.

(2023). Islamophobic discourse of European right-wing parties: A narrative policy analysis. Social Currents, 10(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965221139852

49.

Politico. (2024a). Italy—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/italy/

50.

Politico. (2024b). Sweden—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/sweden/

51.

Politico. (2024c). Czech Republic—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/czech-republic/

52.

Politico. (2024d). Bulgaria—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/bulgaria/

53.

Politico. (2024e). Belgium—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/belgium/

54.

Politico. (2024f). Greece—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/greece/

55.

Politico. (2024g). Spain—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/spain/

56.

Politico. (2024h). Germany—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/germany/

57.

Politico. (2024i). Portugal—National parliament voting intention. https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/portugal/

58.

Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., & de Vreese, C. H. (Eds.). (2019). Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe. Routledge.

59.

Reinhardt

Heft

Pavan

(2023). Varieties of antigenderism: The politicization of gender issues across three European populist radical right parties. Information, Communication & Society, 27(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2246536

60.

Reporters Without Borders. (2022). 2021 World press freedom index: Journalism, the vaccine against disinformation, blocked in more than 130 countries. https://rsf.org/en/2021-world-press-freedom-index-journalism-vaccine-against-disinformation-blocked-more-130-countries?year=2021&data_type=general

61.

Ritter

(2022). New Swedish prime minister presents a 3-party center-right government. PBS News Hour, 10. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/new-swedish-prime-minister-presents-a-3-party-center-right-government .

62.

Shier

Shor

(2016). “Shades of foreign evil”: “honor killings” and “family murders” in the Canadian Press. Violence Against Women, 22(10), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215621176

63.

Smith

(2021). Calls for femicide to become separate crime in Greece mount as two more women killed. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/dec/21/greece-femicide-crime-two-more-women-killed

64.

Spies

(2020). The portrayal of victims of intimate femicide in the South African media. Journal of African Media Studies, 12(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00010_1

65.

Stier, S., Posch, L., Bleier, A., & Strohmaier, M. (2017). When populists become popular: Comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1365–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519

66.

Tang

C. S.-K.

Wong

Cheung

Lee

(2000). Exploring how Chinese define violence against women: A focus group study in Hong Kong. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00071-6

67.

Van Kessel

Castelein

(2016). Shifting the blame. Populist politicians’ use of Twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(2), 594–614. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v12i2.709

68.

Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., Maher, J., & McCulloch, J. (Eds.). (2020). The Emerald handbook of feminism, criminology and social change. Emerald Publishing Limited.

69.

Wodak

KhosraviNik

Mral

(2013). Right-wing populism in Europe. Bloomsbury.

70.

Worldbank. (2025a). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.NETM?locations=EU

71.

Worldbank. (2025b). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=Z7&name_desc=true

72.

WRF Malta. (n.d.). Ongoing Projects | WRF Malta. https://www.wrf.org.mt/ongoing-projects

73.

Yardley

(2017). Social media homicide confessions: Stories of killers and their victims. Bristol University Press.

74.

Yilmaz

(2012). Right-wing hegemony and immigration: How the populist far-right achieved hegemony through the immigration debate in Europe. Current Sociology, 60(3), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111426192

Online Discourses on Femicide and European Nationalist and Populist Parties: A Quantitative Analysis of the Femicide Discourse in European Social Media Posts

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References