Between International Policy and Local Practice: Nepali Service Providers’ Constructions of Domestic Violence in Context

Abstract

The conceptualization of social problems is an important site for examining the extent to which the knowledge and priorities of local practitioners are reflected in international policy. This study employed critical discourse analysis to examine the constructions of domestic violence (DV) used by service providers in Pokhara, Nepal, as compared with two major international women's human rights policy documents. Both constructed DV as a human rights issue that should be contextualized within patriarchal and intersecting oppressions. Service providers additionally emphasized the denial of rights and entitlements of family life as DV. This finding underscores the long-term risks that survivors navigate and suggests that international human rights policymakers should broaden conceptualizations of DV.

Keywords

domestic violence Nepal discourse international policy human rights gender-based violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advocacy Forum & International Center for Transitional Justice. (2010). Across the lines: The impact of Nepal’s conflict on women.

Ahearn

L. M.

(2012). Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters, and social change in Nepal. The University of Michigan Press.

Alexander

M. J.

Mohanty

C. T.

(Ed.) (1997). Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures. Routledge.

Ali

Krantz

Mogren

(2012). Violence permeating daily life: A qualitative study investigating perspectives on violence among women in Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Women’s Health, 4, 577–585. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S33325

Alsinai

Reygers

DiMascolo

Kafka

Rowhani-Rahbar

Adhia

Bowen

Shanahan

Dalve

Ellyson

A. M.

(2023). Use of immigration status for coercive control in domestic violence protection orders. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1146102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1146102

Anzaldúa

(2012). Borderlands: La frontera: The new Mestiza (4th ed.). Aunt Lute Books.

Bhabha

H. K.

(2012). The location of culture (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551

Birks

Mills

(2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.

Bochenek

Knight

(2012). Establishing a third gender category in Nepal: Process and prognosis. Emory International Law Review, 26(1), 11–41, https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol26/iss1/3

10.

Chambon

A. S.

(1999). Foucault’s approach: Making the familiar visible. In Chambon

A. S.

Irving

Epstein

(Eds.), Reading Foucault for social work (pp. 51–81). Columbia University Press.

11.

Chaudhuri

Morash

(2019). Building empowerment, resisting patriarchy. Sociology of Development, 5(4), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2019.5.4.360

12.

Chowdhury

E. H.

(2011). Transnationalism reversed: Women organizing against gendered violence in Bangladesh. State University of New York Press.

13.

Colombini

Mayhew

S. H.

Hawkins

Bista

Joshi

S. K.

Schei

Watts

(2016). Agenda setting and framing of gender-based violence in Nepal: How it became a health issue. Health Policy and Planning, 31(4), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czv091

14.

CREA. (n.d.). Count me in! Research report: Violence against disabled, lesbian, and sex-working women in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal.

15.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

16.

Donnelly

Holt

(2021). On the margins: The challenges of identifying domestic violence in mental health services. Findings of a qualitative Irish study. Journal of Family Violence, 36(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00205-w

17.

Emmel

(2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. Sage.

18.

Esquivel

(2014). What is a transformative approach to care, and why do we need it? Gender & Development, 22(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.963303

19.

Fairclough

(2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

20.

Falcón

S. M.

(2016). Power interrupted: Antiracist and feminist activism inside the United Nations (1st ed.). University of Washington Press.

21.

Gee

J. P.

(2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

22.

Ghimire

(2023). How court laid the ground for same-sex marriage in Nepal. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2023/12/03/how-court-laid-the-ground-for-same-sex-marriage-in-nepal

23.

Guerin

De Oliveira Ortolan

(2017). Analyzing domestic violence behaviors in their contexts: Violence as a continuation of social strategies by other means. Behavior and Social Issues, 26(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v26i0.6804

24.

Gupta

Cardoso

L. F.

Ferguson

Shrestha

P. N.

Harris

Groce

Clark

C. J.

(2018). Disability status, intimate partner violence and perceived social support among married women in three districts of the Terai region of Nepal. BMJ Global Health, 3(5), e000934. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000934

25.

Hall

(2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge, and discourse. In Wetherell

Yates

Taylor

(Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 72–81). Sage.

26.

Hemment

(2014). Global civil society and the local costs of belonging: Defining violence against women in Russia. In Bernal

Grewal

(Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 119–142). Duke University Press.

27.

Incite! Women of Color Against Violence. (2006). Color of violence: The Incite! anthology. South End Press.

28.

Kabeer

(1994/2003). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. Verso.

29.

Kabeer

(2011). Between affiliation and autonomy: Navigating pathways of women’s empowerment and gender justice in rural Bangladesh. Development and Change, 42(2), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01703.x

30.

Kabeer

(2015). Gender, poverty, and inequality: A brief history of feminist contributions in the field of international development. Gender & Development, 23(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2015.1062300

31.

Kandiyoti

(1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004

32.

Knight

K. G.

Flores

A. R.

Nezhad

S. J.

(2015). Surveying Nepal’s third gender. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2848904

33.

LeGreco

Tracy

S. J.

(2009). Discourse tracing as qualitative practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(9), 1516–1543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409343064

34.

Liechty

(1996). Paying for modernity: Women and the discourse of freedom in Kathmandu. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 1(1), 201–230. https://martinchautari.org.np/storage/files/sinhas-vol1-no1-mark-liechty.pdf

35.

Lindhorst

Edleson

J. L.

(2012). Battered women, their children, and international law: The unintended consequences of the Hague Child Abduction Convention. Northeastern University Press.

36.

Lindhorst

Mehrotra

Spencer

S. L.

(2010). Outing the abuse: Considerations for effective practice with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender survivors of intimate partner violence. In Lockhart

L. L.

Danis

F. S.

(Eds.), Domestic violence: Intersectionality and culturally competent practice (pp. 232–267). Columbia University Press.

37.

Lindhorst

Tajima

(2008). Reconceptualizing and operationalizing context in survey research on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(3), 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507312293

38.

Lohani-Chase

R. S.

(2014). Protesting women in the people’s war movement in Nepal. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 40(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/67689

39.

Maharjan

M. R.

(2015). Emigrants' migrant wives: Linking international and internal migration. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 20(2), 217–247.

40.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

41.

Ministry of Health, Nepal, New ERA, & ICF. (2017). Nepal demographic and health survey, 2016.

42.

Mosse

(2014). Knowledge as relational: Reflections on knowledge in international development. Forum for Development Studies, 41(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2014.959379

43.

Nepal Law Commission. (2009). Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act, 2066. https://evaw-global-database.unwomen.org/-/media/files/un%20women/vaw/full%20text/asia/domestic%20violence%20offense%20and%20punishment%20act%202066/dv%20crime%20and%20punishment%20act%202009.pdf?vs=22 and https://shambhunathmun.gov.np/sites/shambhunathmu

44.

Ong

(1996). Strategic sisterhood or sisters in solidarity? Questions of communitarianism and citizenship in Asia. Indiana Journal of Legal Studies, 4(1), 107–135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20644642

45.

Panchanadeswaran

Koverola

(2005). The voices of battered women in India. Violence Against Women, 11(6), 736–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205276088

46.

Pariyar

Lovett

J. C.

(2016). Dalit identity in urban Pokhara, Nepal. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 75, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.006

47.

Postmus

J. L.

Hoge

G. L.

Breckenridge

Sharp-Jeffs

Chung

(2020). Economic abuse as an invisible form of domestic violence: A multicountry review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018764160

48.

Pun

K. D.

Infanti

J. J.

Koju

Schei

Darj

, & on Behalf of the ADVANCE Study Group. (2016). Community perceptions on domestic violence against pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study. Global Health Action, 9(1), 31964. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.31964

49.

Puri

Tamang

Shah

(2011). Suffering in silence: Consequences of sexual violence within marriage among young women in Nepal. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-29

50.

Rankin

K. N.

(2004). The cultural politics of markets: Economic liberalization and social change in Nepal. Pluto Press.

51.

Richie

(2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York University Press.

52.

SAATHI & The Asian Foundation. (1997). A situational analysis of violence against women and girls in Nepal.

53.

Sabri

Sabarwal

Decker

M. R.

Shrestha

Sharma

Thapa

Surkan

P. J.

(2016). Violence against widows in Nepal: Experiences, coping behaviors, and barriers in seeking help. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(9), 1744–1766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515569058

54.

Sahavagi, DidiBahini, & Feminist Dalit Organization. (2015). Progress of women in Nepal (1995-2015): Substantive equality: Non-negotiable. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/12/substantive-equality-non-negotiable

55.

Schechter

(1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. South End Press.

56.

Schuler

S. R.

Nazneen

(2018). Does intimate partner violence decline as women’s empowerment becomes normative? Perspectives of Bangladeshi women. World Development, 101, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.005

57.

Sepúlveda

Carmona, M.

Donald

What does care have to do with human rights? Analysing the impact on women's rights and gender equality. Gender & Development, 22(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.963305

58.

Sewpaul

(2016). The West and the Rest divide: Human rights, culture and social work. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 1(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-016-0003-2

59.

Stark

E. D.

(2009). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.

60.

Storer

H. L.

Rodriguez

(2021). Leaving was a process, not an event”: The lived experience of dating and domestic violence in 140 characters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11-12), P6553–P6580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518816325

61.

Swarr

A. L.

Nagar

(Ed.) (2010). Critical transnational feminist praxis. SUNY Press.

62.

Tamang

(2009). The politics of conflict and difference or the difference of conflict in politics: The women’s movement in Nepal. Feminist Review, 91(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.50

63.

Turner

R. L.

(1966). A comparative and etymological dictionary of the Nepali language. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.

64.

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (1992). CEDAW General Recommendations Number 19, adopted at the Eleventh Session .

65.

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (2017). General recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating general recommendation No. 19 .

66.

UN General Assembly. (1979) Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. United Nations.

67.

United Nations Specialised Conferences. (1995). Beijing declaration and platform of action, adopted at the fourth world conference on women. United Nations.

68.

Uvin

(2007). From the right to development to the rights-based approach: How ‘human rights’ entered development. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469617

69.

Weldon

S. L.

Htun

(2013). Feminist mobilisation and progressive policy change: Why governments take action to combat violence against women. Gender & Development, 21(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2013.802158

70.

Willey-Sthapit

(2024). Epistemic justice in international social work research: Postcolonial theory and analytic strategies. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(2), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12613

71.

Willey-Sthapit

Lindhorst

Kemp

Magarati

(2024). Entrenched, unrelenting, unsettled: Cultural essentialism in international development research on domestic violence in Nepal. Affilia, 39(2), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231206566

72.

Willey

(2021). Between international policy and local practice: Negotiating meaning and strategies to address domestic violence in Nepal [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington.

73.

Yoshihama

(2001). Immigrants-in-context framework: Understanding the interactive influence of socio-cultural contexts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00021-0