The present study aimed to expand the understanding of the correlates of sexual harassment myths, a set of beliefs that serve to justify male perpetrators. Data collected among Italian adults (N = 407; 59.5% women) showed that individual levels of precarious manhood beliefs—according to which manhood is a social status that must be proven via public action—were related to greater sexual harassment myths acceptance in male and female respondents. Such associations were mediated by hostile sexism and benevolence toward men. Findings suggest that interventions to reduce tolerance of sexual harassment of women should target cultural views of manhood and counteract rigid models of masculinity and femininity.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
2.
AhmetogluG.SwamiV. (2012). Do women prefer “nice guys”? The effect of male dominance behavior on women’s ratings of sexual attractiveness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(4), 667–672. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.4.667
AminA.KågestenA.AdebayoE.Chandra-MouliV. (2018). Addressing gender socialization and masculinity norms among adolescent boys: Policy and programmatic implications. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 62(3S), S3–S5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.022
5.
BossonJ. K.JurekP.VandelloJ. A.Kosakowska-BerezeckaN.OlechM.BestaT.BenderM.HoorensV.BeckerM.SevincerT. A.BestD. L.SafdarS.WłodarczykA.ZawiszaM.ŻadkowskaM.AbuhamdehS.AgyemangC. B.AkbaşG.Albayrak-AydemirN., … ŽukauskienėR. (2021). Psychometric properties and correlates of precarious manhood beliefs in 62 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(3), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022121997997
6.
BossonJ. K.VandelloJ. A.BurnafordR. M.WeaverJ. R.Arzu WastiS. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331161
7.
BossonJ. K.WilkersonM.Kosakowska-BerezeckaN.JurekP.OlechM. (2022). Harder won and easier lost? Testing the double standard in gender rules in 62 countries. Sex Roles, 87, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01297-y
8.
BrownC. S.BiefeldS. D.ElpersN. (2020). A bioecological theory of sexual harassment of girls: Research synthesis and proposed model. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020954363
ChapleauK. M.OswaldD. L.RussellB. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2
11.
ColeB. P.BrennanM.TylerE.WillardR. (2020). Predicting men’s acceptance of sexual violence myths through conformity to masculine norms, sexism, and “locker room talk”. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(4), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000248
12.
CowanG. (2000). Women’s hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths. Violence Against Women, 6(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022181822
13.
DahlJ.VescioT.WeaverK. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a0002
14.
de ZavalaA. G.BierwiaczonekK. (2021). Male, national, and religious collective narcissism predict sexism. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 84(11–12), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01193-3
15.
DiehlC.GlaserT.BohnerG. (2014). Face the consequences: Learning about victim’s suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men’s likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behavior, 40(6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21553
16.
DiehlC.ReesJ.BohnerG. (2018). Predicting sexual harassment from hostile sexism and short-term mating orientation: Relative strength of predictors depends on situational priming of power versus sex. Violence Against Women, 24(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216678092
17.
DiMuccioS. H.YostM. R.Helweg-LarsenM. (2017). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of precarious manhood in US and Danish men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000062
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
20.
FernándezM. L.CastroY. R.LorenzoM. G. (2004). Evolution of hostile sexism and benevolent sexism in a Spanish sample. Social Indicators Research, 66(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003553.30419.f1.
21.
GilmoreD. D. (1990). Manhood in the making. Yale University Press.
22.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
23.
GlickP.LameirasM.FiskeS. T.EckesT.MasserB.VolpatoC.ManganelliA. M.PekJ. C. X.HuangL.Sakalli-UğurluN.CastroY. R.D'Avila PereiraM. L.WillemsenT. M.BrunnerA.Six-MaternaI.WellsR. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713
24.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
25.
HillS.MarshallT. C. (2018). Beliefs about sexual assault in India and Britain are explained by attitudes toward women and hostile sexism. Sex Roles, 79(7–8), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0880-6
26.
HoominfarE. (2021). Gender socialization. In Leal FilhoW.Marisa AzulA.BrandliL.Lange SalviaA.WallT. (Eds) Gender equality. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals (pp. 645–654). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95687-9_13
KågestenA.GibbsS.BlumR. W.MoreauC.Chandra-MouliV.HerbertA.AminA. (2016). Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PloS One, 11(6), Article e0157805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157805
29.
KesslerA. M.KennairL. E. O.GrøntvedtT. V.BjørkheimI.DrejerI.BendixenM. (2021). Perception of workplace social-sexual behavior as sexual harassment post #MeToo in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(6), 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12763
30.
KimmelM. S.AronsonA. (2003). Men & masculinities: A social, cultural, and historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO.
31.
Kosakowska-BerezeckaN.BestaT.AdamskaK.JaśkiewiczM.JurekP.VandelloJ. A. (2016). If my masculinity is threatened, I won't support gender equality? The role of agentic self-stereotyping in restoration of manhood and perception of gender relations. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(3), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000016
32.
Kosakowska-BerezeckaN.BestaT.BossonJ. K.JurekP.VandelloJ. A.BestD. L.WlodarczykA.SafdarS.ZawiszaM.ZadkowskaM.SobieckiJ.AgyemangC. B.AkbasG.AmmiratiS.AndersonJ.AnjumG.ArutaJ. J. B. R.AshrafM.BakaityteA., … ZukauskieneR. (2020). Country-level and individual-level predictors of men’s support for gender equality in 42 countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1276–1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2696
33.
KroeperK. M.SanchezD. T.HimmelsteinM. S. (2014). Heterosexual men’s confrontation of sexual prejudice: The role of precarious manhood. Sex Roles, 70(1–2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0306-z
34.
LoganT. K.EvansL.StevensonE.JordanC. E. (2005). Barriers to services for rural and urban survivors of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504272899
35.
LonswayK. A.CortinaL. M.MagleyV. J. (2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58(1), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11199-007-9367-1
36.
MaassA.CadinuM.GuarnieriG.GrasselliA. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853
37.
MahalikJ. R.LockeB. D.LudlowL. H.DiemerM. A.ScottR. P. J.GottfriedM.FreitasG. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
38.
MazzucaS.MoscatelliS.MenegattiM.RubiniM. (2022). Men’s reactions to gender inequality in the workplace: From relative deprivation on behalf of women to collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 999750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999750
39.
MenegattiM.MazzucaS.CiaffoniS.MoscatelliS. (2022). Behind the lines of #MeToo: Exploring women’s and men’s intentions to join the movement. Sustainability, 14(19), 12294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912294.
40.
MoscatelliS.GolfieriF.TomasettoC.BiglerR. (2021). Women and #MeToo in Italy: Internalized sexualization is associated with tolerance of sexual harassment and negative views of the #MeToo movement. Current Psychology, 40(12), 6199–6211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01350-1
OstuniA.SaccoG.SaccoP.ZizzaA. (2022). Italian society and gender role stereotypes: How stereotypical beliefs concerning males and females are still present in Italian people at the beginning of the third millennium. European Scientific Journal, 18(16), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n16p1
43.
PacilliM. G. (2020). Uomini duri: Il lato oscuro della mascolinità [Tough men: The dark side of masculinity]. Il Mulino.
44.
PagliaroS.PacilliM. G.BaldryA. C. (2020). Bystanders’ reactions to intimate partner violence: An experimental approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1776031
45.
ReidyD. E.Smith-DardenJ. P.CortinaK. S.KernsmithR. M.KernsmithP. D. (2015). Masculine discrepancy stress, teen dating violence, and sexual violence perpetration among adolescent boys. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.009
46.
RolleroC. (2013). Sexist attitudes and support for the status quo. Psicologia Politica, 46, 117–128.
47.
RolleroC.GlickP.TartagliaS. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.2.3
48.
RolleroC.TartagliaS. (2019). The effect of sexism and rape myths on victim blame. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 23(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8
49.
RotundoM.NguyenD.-H.SackettP. R. (2001). A metanalytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.914
50.
RussellB. L.TriggK. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7-8), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd
SirinS. R.McCrearyD. R.MahalikJ. R. (2004). Differential reactions to men and women’s gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 12(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1202.119
53.
SuarezE.GadallaT. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503
54.
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826
55.
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K.CohenD.BurnafordR. M.WeaverJ. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001245
56.
VandelloJ. A.HettingerV. E.BossonJ. K.SiddiqiJ. (2013). When equal isn't really equal: The masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12016
57.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage.
58.
VikiG. T.AbramsD.MasserB. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029140.72880.69
59.
WaltherA.RiceT.EggenbergerL. (2023). Precarious manhood beliefs are positively associated with erectile dysfunction in cisgender men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(7), 3123–3138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02640-4.
60.
WeaverK.VescioT. (2015). The justification of social inequality in response to masculinity threats. Sex Roles, 72(5), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0484-y
WinegardB. M.WinegardB.GearyD. C. (2014). Eastwood’s brawn and Einstein’s brain: An evolutionary account of dominance, prestige, and precarious manhood. Review of General Psychology, 18(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036594
63.
WittS. D. (2000). The influence of peers on children’s socialization to gender roles. Early Child Development and Care, 162(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443001620101
64.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7.
65.
WorthenM. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF, and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11199-012-0155-1
66.
ZelinA. I.BrandaB.TinoR. (2022). How do you define sexual harassment? Why context matters. Violence Against Women, 28(14), 3438–3456. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211060862
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
