Recent studies examining sexual harassment in the military indicate a decrease in reports of harassment, which may be attributed to several factors, including zero-tolerance policies or anti-harassment programs. However, the decrease may also be attributed to fears of losing one’s job or of being derogated by colleagues if harassment is reported. This qualitative study of women employed in the Canadian combat arms examined spontaneously shared perceptions and experiences of sexual harassment. Six of the 26 women interviewed shared their experiences or perceptions of harassment, including concerns about potential repercussions of reporting. Implications for gender integration in military organizations are discussed.
AvinaC.O’DonohueW. (2002). Sexual harassment and PTSD: Is sexual harassment diagnosable trauma?Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 69-75.
2.
BondL. A.HolmesT. R.ByrneC.BabchuckL.Kirton-RobbinsS. (2008). Movers and shakers: How and why women become and remain engaged in community leadership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 48-64.
3.
BostockD. J.DaleyJ. G. (2007). Lifetime and current sexual assault and harassment victimization rates of active-duty United States Air Force women. Violence Against Women, 13, 927-944.
CantisanoG. T.DominguezJ. F. M.DepoloM. (2008). Perceived sexual harassment at work: Meta-analysis and structural model of antecedents and consequences. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 207-218.
6.
ChavezC. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. Qualitative Report, 13, 474-494.
7.
CowanG. (2000). Women’s hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths. Violence Against Women, 6, 238-246.
8.
DalyL.BourkeG. J. (2000). Interpretation and uses of medical statistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
DavisK. D. (1997). Chief land staff gender integration study: The regular force training and employment environment (Personnel Research Team Sponsor Research Report 97-2). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Defence Headquarters.
10.
DavisK. D. (2004). Research and organizational change: Women in the Canadian Forces. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 2, 171-180.
11.
DavisK. D.ThomasV. (1998). Chief land staff gender integration study: The experience of women who have served in the combat arms (Personnel Research Team Sponsor Research Report 98-1). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Defence Headquarters.
Department of Defense. (1996, July2). News briefing by Edwin Dorn, USD, Personnel and Readiness.
14.
Department of National Defence. (2004). Harassment prevention and resolution guidelines. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of National Defence.
15.
EyringM. (1998). How close is close enough? Reflections on the experience of doing phenomenology. In Bennett deMarraisK. (Ed.), Qualitative research reflections (pp. 139-149). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
FebbraroA. R. (2003). Women, leadership, and gender integration in the Canadian combat arms: A qualitative study (DRDC Toronto TR 2003-170). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Defence Research and Development Canada.
17.
FebbraroA. R. (2004). Gender and leadership in the Canadian Forces combat arms: A qualitative study of assimilation vs. integration. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 2, 215-228.
18.
FebbraroA. R.GillR. (2010). Gender and military psychology. In ChrislerJ. C.McCrearyD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 670-691). New York: Springer.
19.
FieldingN. (2000). The shared fate of two innovations in qualitative methodology: The relationship of qualitative software and secondary analysis of archived qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(3). Retrieved from http://qualitative-Research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
20.
FirestoneJ. M.HarrisR. J. (1999). Changes in patterns of sexual harassment in the U.S. military: A comparison of the 1988 and 1995 DoD surveys. Armed Forces & Society, 25, 613-632.
21.
FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF.HulinC. L.GelfandM. J.MagleyV. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
22.
FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF.MagleyV. J. (1999). Sexual harassment in the armed forces: A test of an integrated model. Military Psychology, 11, 329-343.
23.
FitzgeraldL. F.SwanS.MagleyV. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In O’DonohueW. (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5-28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
GaffneyF. (2011, August). Sexual assault toward women in the military. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
25.
GillR. M.FebbraroA. R. (2008a, October). Sexual harassment among women in the Canadian Forces combat arms. Paper presented at the NATO RTO HFM-158 Symposium on Impacts of Gender Differences on Conducting Operational Activities, Antalya, Turkey.
26.
GillR. M.FebbraroA. R. (2008b). Sexual harassment among women in the Canadian Forces combat arms. In NATO RTO Meeting Proceedings of HFM-158 Symposium on Impacts of Gender Differences on Conducting Operational Activities, Antalya, Turkey [October.(RTO-MP-HFM-158)].
HenryN.WardT.HirshbergM. (2004). A multifactorial model of wartime rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 535-562.
29.
HindsP. S.VogelR. J.Clarke-SteffenL. (1997). The possibilities of pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 408-424.
30.
HoldenN. J.DavisK. D. (2001). A comparative analysis of harassment surveys in TTCP nations (Director Strategic Human Resource Coordination Personnel Operational Research Team & Director Military Gender Integration and Employment Equity ORD Report R2001/01, Department of National Defence Canada, 2001/19). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of National Defence.
31.
HoldenN. J.TannerL. M. (2001). An examination of current gender integration policies in TTCP countries (Director Strategic Human Resource Coordination Personnel Operational Research Team & Director Military Gender Integration and Employment Equity ORD Report R2001/01). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of National Defence.
32.
Hunter-WilliamsJ.FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF. (1999). The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psychology, 11, 303-328.
33.
JensenI. W.GutekB. A. (1982). Attributions and assignment of responsibility in sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121-136.
KenigS.RyanJ. (1986). Gender differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Gender Roles, 15, 535-549.
36.
KorabikK. (2005). Leadership and diversity in the Canadian Forces: A conceptual model and research agenda (DRDC Toronto CR 2005-243). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Defence R&D Canada—Toronto.
37.
LeskinenE.CortinaL. M.KabatD. (2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law & Human Behavior, 35, 25-39.
38.
MarinA. J.GuadagnoR. E. (1999). Perceptions of sexual harassment victims as a function of labeling and reporting. Sex Roles, 41, 912-940.
39.
MossakowskiK. N. (2003). Coping with perceived discrimination: Does ethnic identity protect mental health?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 318-331.
O’ConnellC. E.KorabikK. (2000). Sexual harassment: The relationship of personal vulnerability, work context, perpetrator status, and type of harassment to outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 299-329.
43.
PershingJ. L. (2003). Why women don’t report sexual harassment: A case study of an elite military institution. Gender Issues, 21(4), 4-30.
44.
QSR International. (2008). Nvivo8 qualitative data analysis software, QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 8. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
45.
RosenL. N.MartinL. (1997). Sexual harassment, cohesion, and combat readiness in U.S. army support units. Armed Forces & Society, 24, 221-244.
46.
SagawaS.CampbellN. (1992). Sexual harassment of women in the military (Women in the Military Issue Paper). Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.
47.
StreetA. E.GradusJ. L.StaffordJ.KellyK. (2007). Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: Data from a male-dominated environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 464-474.
48.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
49.
ThorneS. (1990). Secondary analysis in qualitative research: Issues and implications in Nursing Science. In MorseJ. M. (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 263-279). London: Sage.
50.
VogtD.BruceT. A.StreetA. E.StaffordJ. (2007). Attitudes toward women and tolerance for sexual harassment among reservists. Violence Against Women, 13, 879-900.
51.
WelshS. (2000). The multidimensional nature of sexual harassment: An empirical analysis of women’s sexual harassment complaints. Violence Against Women, 6, 118-141.
52.
WinslowD.BrowneP.FebbraroA. (2007). Diversity in the Canadian forces. In SoetersJ.van der MeulenJ. (Eds.), Cultural diversity in the armed forces: An international comparison (pp. 31-47). London: Routledge.
53.
WinslowD.DunnJ. (2002). Women in the Canadian forces: Between legal and social integration. Current Sociology, 5, 641-667.
