The aim of this study is to shed light on how Swedish female survivors of male intimate partner violence experience support from social workers during post-separation violence. This is explored through an interview study with sixteen survivors. Hester’s three planet model is utilized in the analysis. The results show that while the survivors described positive experiences of support from social workers on the Domestic violence planet, they felt social workers in the family law system on the Child contact planet enabled post-separation violence, and reported that this contributed to them feeling betrayed rather than supported.
ArchibaldM. M.AmbagtsheerR. C.CaseyM. G.LawlessM. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, Article 160940691987459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Methodological paper. Counselling Psychotherapy Research, 21, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Sage Publications.
6.
BredalA.StefansenK.BjørnholtM. (2022). Why do people participate in research interviews? Participant orientations and ethical contracts in interviews with victims of interpersonal violence. Qualitative Research : QR. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221138409
7.
BrinkmannS. (2018). The interview. In DenzinL. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research ((5th ed, pp. 576–599). Sage Publications.
BrunoL. (2016). Ofridstid. Fäders våld, staten och den separerande familjen [Dissertation]. Uppsala Universitet.
10.
BrutonC.TysonD. (2018). Leaving violent men: A study of women’s experiences of separation in Victoria, Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865817746711
11.
BuchananF.WendtS. (2018). Opening doors: Women’s participation in feminist studies about domestic violence. Qualitative social work : QSW. Research and Practice, 17(6), 762–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017694081
12.
CarlssonN. (2009). Avslöjandets tid. Kvinnors bearbetning av sexuella övergrepp [Dissertation]. Göteborgs Universitet.
CoatesL.WadeA. (2004). Telling it like it isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045031
EkbrandH. (2006). Separationer och mäns våld mot kvinnor [Dissertation]. Göteborgs Universitet.
20.
ElizabethV.GaevyN.TolmieJ. (2012). “. . . HE’S JUST SWAPPED HIS FISTS FOR THE SYSTEM.” the governance of gender through custody law. Gender & Society, 26(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211434765
21.
EllisD. (1987). Post-Separation woman abuse: The contribution of lawyers as “barracudas,” “advocates,” and “counsellors”. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(87)90022-7
22.
EllisD.LewisT.NeponT. (2021). Effects of historical coercive control, historical violence, and lawyer representation on post-separation male partner violence against mother litigants who participated in adversarial family court proceedings. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220921939
23.
EnanderV.HolmbergC.LindgrenA.-L. (2013). Att följa med samtiden – kvinnojoursrörelse i förändring. Atlas.
24.
ErikssonM. (2003). I skuggan av pappa. Familjerätten och hanteringen av fäders våld [Dissertation]. Uppsala Universitet.
25.
ErikssonM. (2023). Politik lagar och praktik. In ErikssonM.KällströmÅ,, & NäsmanE. (Eds.), Barns röster om våld – att lyssna, tolka och förstå (Vol., pp. 27–41). Gleerups.
26.
ErikssonM.HesterM. (2001). Violent Men as Good-Enough Fathers? A look at England and Sweden. Violence Against Women, 7(7), 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182730
27.
ErikssonM.PringleK. (2005). Introduction: Nordic issues and dilemmas. In ErikssonM.HesterM.KeskinenS.,, & PringleK. (Eds.), Tackling men’s violence. Nordic issues and dilemmas (pp. 1–12). Cambridge University Press.
28.
FranciaL.MillearP.SharmanR. (2020). Mothering – a mode of protecting rather than parenting in the aftermath of post separation family violence in Australia. Children Australia, 45(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2020.24
29.
HardestyJ. L. (2002). Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting: An integrative review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(5), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102400388452
30.
HartA. S.BagshawD. (2008). The idealised post-separation family in Australian family law: A dangerous paradigm in cases of domestic violence. Journal of Family Studies, 14(2-3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.327.14.2-3.291
31.
HayC.GrobbelaarM.GuggisbergM. (2023). Mothers’ post-separation experiences of male partner abuse: An exploratory study. Journal of Family Issues, 44(5), 1276–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211057541
32.
HelmerssonS. (2017). Mellan systerskap och behandling - Omförhandlingar inom ett förändrat stödfält för våldsutsatta kvinnor [Dissertation]. Lunds Universitet.
33.
HesterM. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in contexts of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr095
34.
HesterM.RadfordL. (1996). Domestic violence and child contact arrangements in England and Denmark. The Policy Press.
35.
HoltS. (2017). Domestic violence and the paradox of post-separation mothering. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 2049–2067. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw162
HumphreysC.ThiaraR. K. (2003). Neither justice nor protection: Women’s experiences of post-separation violence. The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 25(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964906032000145948
39.
HydénM. (1999). The world of the fearful: Battered women’s narratives of leaving abusive husbands. Feminism & Psychology, 9(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353599009004012
40.
HydénM. (2014). The teller-focused interview: Interviewing as a relational practice. Qualitative Social Work, 13(6), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013506247
41.
James-HanmanD.HoltS. (2021). Post-Separation contact and domestic violence: Our 7-point plan for safe[r] contact for children. Journal of Family Violence, 36(8), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00256-7
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M.XuY. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214521324
44.
KellyL. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Polity Press.
45.
KrugE.DahlbergL.MercyJ.ZwiA.LozanoR. (2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization (WHO).
46.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun (3 uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
47.
LaingL. (2017). Secondary victimization: Domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1314–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216659942
LiangB.GoodmanL.Tummala-NarraP.WeintraubS. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6
50.
Lo IaconoV.SymondsP.BrownD. H. K. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
51.
MahoneyM. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90(1), 1–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289533
52.
MatthewsK. L.BairdM.DuchesneG. (2018). Using online meeting software to facilitate geographically dispersed focus groups for health workforce research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318782167
53.
MirickR.WladkowskiS. (2019). Skype in qualitative interviews: Participant and researcher perspectives. Qualitative Report, 24(12), 3061–3072. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3632
NikupeteriA. (2017). Stalked lives: Finnish women’s emotional experiences of post-separation stalking. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1192055
57.
NilssonG. (2009). Könsmakt eller häxjakt? Antagonistiska föreställningar om mäns våld mot kvinnor. [Doktorsavhandling. Lunds Universitet].
58.
OrnsteinP.RickneJ. (2013). When does intimate partner violence continue after separation?Violence Against Women, 19(5), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213490560
Sev’erA. (1997). Recent or imminent separation and intimate violence against women: A conceptual overview and some Canadian examples. Violence Against Women, 3(6), 566–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801297003006002
63.
ShannonE. R. (2022). Safeguarding and agency: Methodological tensions in conducting research with survivors of sexual violence in universities. Social Sciences (Basel), 11(8), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080350
SongM.ParkerD. (1995). Commonality, difference and the dynamics of disclosure in in-depth interviewing. Sociology (Oxford), 29(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029002004
66.
SOSFS. (2009:22). Allmänna råd. Socialnämndens arbete med våldsutsatta kvinnor samt barn som bevittnat våld. Socialstyrelsens, författningssamling.
SpearmanK. J.HardestyJ. L.CampbellJ. (2022). Post-separation abuse: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(4), 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15310
70.
SpearmanK. J.Vaughan-EdenV.HardestyJ. L.CampbellJ. (2023). Post-separation abuse: A literature review connecting tactics to harm. Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development (Print), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/26904586.2023.2177233
71.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
ToewsM.BermeaA. (2017). I was naive in thinking, ‘I divorced this man, he is out of my life’”: A qualitative exploration of post- separation power and control tactics experienced by women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(14), 2166–2189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591278
76.
WellerS. (2017). Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505
77.
WemrellM.StjernlöfS.AenishänslinM. L.GarciaE.IvertA.-K. (2019). Towards understanding the Nordic paradox: A review of qualitative interview studies on intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) in Sweden. Sociology Compass, 13, e12699. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12699
78.
Wendt HöjerM. (2002). Rädslans politik: våld och sexualitet i den svenska demokratin. Liber.
79.
WHO. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Written by World Health Organization, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC). ISBN 978 92 4 156462 5.
ZeoliA.RiceraE.SullivanC.KubiakS. (2013). Post-Separation abuse of women and their children: Boundary-setting and family court utilization among victimized mothers. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9528-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
