Support or Betrayal? Swedish Survivors’ Experiences of Support From Social Workers During Post-Separation Violence

Abstract

The aim of this study is to shed light on how Swedish female survivors of male intimate partner violence experience support from social workers during post-separation violence. This is explored through an interview study with sixteen survivors. Hester’s three planet model is utilized in the analysis. The results show that while the survivors described positive experiences of support from social workers on the Domestic violence planet, they felt social workers in the family law system on the Child contact planet enabled post-separation violence, and reported that this contributed to them feeling betrayed rather than supported.

Keywords

post-separation violence men's intimate partner violence against women social work the three planet model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archibald

M. M.

Ambagtsheer

R. C.

Casey

M. G.

Lawless

(2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, Article 160940691987459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun

Clarke

(2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Methodological paper. Counselling Psychotherapy Research, 21, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Braun

Clarke

(2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

Braun

Clarke

(2022). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Sage Publications.

Bredal

Stefansen

Bjørnholt

(2022). Why do people participate in research interviews? Participant orientations and ethical contracts in interviews with victims of interpersonal violence. Qualitative Research : QR. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221138409

Brinkmann

(2018). The interview. In Denzin

L. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research ((5th ed, pp. 576–599). Sage Publications.

Brownridge

(2006). Violence against women post-separation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.009

Bruno

(2016). Ofridstid. Fäders våld, staten och den separerande familjen [Dissertation]. Uppsala Universitet.

10.

Bruton

Tyson

(2018). Leaving violent men: A study of women’s experiences of separation in Victoria, Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865817746711

11.

Buchanan

Wendt

(2018). Opening doors: Women’s participation in feminist studies about domestic violence. Qualitative social work : QSW. Research and Practice, 17(6), 762–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017694081

12.

Carlsson

(2009). Avslöjandets tid. Kvinnors bearbetning av sexuella övergrepp [Dissertation]. Göteborgs Universitet.

13.

Children and Parents Code. (1949:381). Föräldrabalk. Justitiedepartementet. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/foraldrabalk-1949381_sfs-1949-381

14.

Coates

Wade

(2004). Telling it like it isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045031

15.

Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (CETS No. 210). (2011). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=210

16.

Deakin

Wakefield

(2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126

17.

Declaration on the Elimination of all Violence Against Women. (1993). https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.21_declaration%20elimination%20vaw.pdf

18.

Douglas

(2018). Legal systems abuse and coercive control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728380

19.

Ekbrand

(2006). Separationer och mäns våld mot kvinnor [Dissertation]. Göteborgs Universitet.

20.

Elizabeth

Gaevy

Tolmie

(2012). “. . . HE’S JUST SWAPPED HIS FISTS FOR THE SYSTEM.” the governance of gender through custody law. Gender & Society, 26(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211434765

21.

Ellis

(1987). Post-Separation woman abuse: The contribution of lawyers as “barracudas,” “advocates,” and “counsellors”. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(87)90022-7

22.

Ellis

Lewis

Nepon

(2021). Effects of historical coercive control, historical violence, and lawyer representation on post-separation male partner violence against mother litigants who participated in adversarial family court proceedings. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220921939

23.

Enander

Holmberg

Lindgren

A.-L.

(2013). Att följa med samtiden – kvinnojoursrörelse i förändring. Atlas.

24.

Eriksson

(2003). I skuggan av pappa. Familjerätten och hanteringen av fäders våld [Dissertation]. Uppsala Universitet.

25.

Eriksson

(2023). Politik lagar och praktik. In Eriksson

Källström

,, & Näsman

(Eds.), Barns röster om våld – att lyssna, tolka och förstå (Vol., pp. 27–41). Gleerups.

26.

Eriksson

Hester

(2001). Violent Men as Good-Enough Fathers? A look at England and Sweden. Violence Against Women, 7(7), 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182730

27.

Eriksson

Pringle

(2005). Introduction: Nordic issues and dilemmas. In Eriksson

Hester

Keskinen

,, & Pringle

(Eds.), Tackling men’s violence. Nordic issues and dilemmas (pp. 1–12). Cambridge University Press.

28.

Francia

Millear

Sharman

(2020). Mothering – a mode of protecting rather than parenting in the aftermath of post separation family violence in Australia. Children Australia, 45(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2020.24

29.

Hardesty

J. L.

(2002). Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting: An integrative review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(5), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102400388452

30.

Hart

A. S.

Bagshaw

(2008). The idealised post-separation family in Australian family law: A dangerous paradigm in cases of domestic violence. Journal of Family Studies, 14(2-3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.327.14.2-3.291

31.

Hay

Grobbelaar

Guggisberg

(2023). Mothers’ post-separation experiences of male partner abuse: An exploratory study. Journal of Family Issues, 44(5), 1276–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211057541

32.

Helmersson

(2017). Mellan systerskap och behandling - Omförhandlingar inom ett förändrat stödfält för våldsutsatta kvinnor [Dissertation]. Lunds Universitet.

33.

Hester

(2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in contexts of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr095

34.

Hester

Radford

(1996). Domestic violence and child contact arrangements in England and Denmark. The Policy Press.

35.

Holt

(2017). Domestic violence and the paradox of post-separation mothering. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 2049–2067. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw162

36.

Holt

(2020). Domestic abuse and post-separation contact: Promoting evidence-informed practice. Child Abuse Review, 29(4), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.264

37.

HSLF-FS. (2022:39). Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd om våld i nära relationer. Socialstyrelsen.https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/foreskrifter-och-allmanna-rad/2022-6-7967.pdf

38.

Humphreys

Thiara

R. K.

(2003). Neither justice nor protection: Women’s experiences of post-separation violence. The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 25(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964906032000145948

39.

Hydén

(1999). The world of the fearful: Battered women’s narratives of leaving abusive husbands. Feminism & Psychology, 9(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353599009004012

40.

Hydén

(2014). The teller-focused interview: Interviewing as a relational practice. Qualitative Social Work, 13(6), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013506247

41.

James-Hanman

Holt

(2021). Post-Separation contact and domestic violence: Our 7-point plan for safe[r] contact for children. Journal of Family Violence, 36(8), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00256-7

42.

Johnson

M. P.

(2008). Typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uu/detail.action?docID=1084935

43.

Johnson

M. P.

Leone

J. M.

(2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214521324

44.

Kelly

(1988). Surviving sexual violence. Polity Press.

45.

Krug

Dahlberg

Mercy

Zwi

Lozano

(2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization (WHO).

46.

Kvale

Brinkmann

(2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun (3 uppl.). Studentlitteratur.

47.

Laing

(2017). Secondary victimization: Domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1314–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216659942

48.

Law of ethical approval. (2003:460). Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor. Utbildningsdepartementet. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2003460-om-etikprovning-av-forskning-som_sfs-2003-460

49.

Liang

Goodman

Tummala-Narra

Weintraub

(2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6

50.

Lo Iacono

Symonds

Brown

D. H. K.

(2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952

51.

Mahoney

(1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90(1), 1–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289533

52.

Matthews

K. L.

Baird

Duchesne

(2018). Using online meeting software to facilitate geographically dispersed focus groups for health workforce research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318782167

53.

Mirick

Wladkowski

(2019). Skype in qualitative interviews: Participant and researcher perspectives. Qualitative Report, 24(12), 3061–3072. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3632

54.

National Board of Health and Welfare (2016). Våld. Handbok om socialtjänstens och hälso- och sjukvårdens arbete med våld i nära relationer. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/handbocker/2016-6-37.pdf

55.

National Board of Health and Welfare (2020). Kartläggning av skyddade boenden i Sverige. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2020-6-6817.pdf

56.

Nikupeteri

(2017). Stalked lives: Finnish women’s emotional experiences of post-separation stalking. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1192055

57.

Nilsson

(2009). Könsmakt eller häxjakt? Antagonistiska föreställningar om mäns våld mot kvinnor. [Doktorsavhandling. Lunds Universitet].

58.

Ornstein

Rickne

(2013). When does intimate partner violence continue after separation? Violence Against Women, 19(5), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213490560

59.

Proposition. (1997/98:55). Kvinnofrid. Socialdepartementet. https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/1733625e719c43b28f073fa9cdec90f2/kvinnofrid-prop.-19979855

60.

Rajah

Osborn

(2022). Understanding women’s resistance to intimate partner violence: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 01/2020, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019897345

61.

Roks. (2022). Kvinnors trygghet. Ett jämställt samhälle fyllt av våld. https://roks.se/sites/default/files/2022-11/Roks%20rapport%202022_webb-enkelsid.pdf

62.

Sev’er

(1997). Recent or imminent separation and intimate violence against women: A conceptual overview and some Canadian examples. Violence Against Women, 3(6), 566–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801297003006002

63.

Shannon

E. R.

(2022). Safeguarding and agency: Methodological tensions in conducting research with survivors of sexual violence in universities. Social Sciences (Basel), 11(8), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080350

64.

Social Services Act (2001:453). Socialtjänstlag. Socialdepartementet. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/socialtjanstlag-2001453_sfs-2001-453

65.

Song

Parker

(1995). Commonality, difference and the dynamics of disclosure in in-depth interviewing. Sociology (Oxford), 29(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029002004

66.

SOSFS. (2009:22). Allmänna råd. Socialnämndens arbete med våldsutsatta kvinnor samt barn som bevittnat våld. Socialstyrelsens, författningssamling.

67.

SOSFS. (2014:4). Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd om socialtjänstens och hälso- och sjukvårdens arbete mot våld i nära relationer. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/regler-och-riktlinjer/foreskrifter-och-allmanna-rad/konsoliderade-foreskrifter/20144-om-vald-i-nara-relationer/

68.

SOU. (1995:60). Kvinnofrid. Statens offentliga utredningar.

69.

Spearman

K. J.

Hardesty

J. L.

Campbell

(2022). Post-separation abuse: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(4), 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15310

70.

Spearman

K. J.

Vaughan-Eden

Hardesty

J. L.

Campbell

(2023). Post-separation abuse: A literature review connecting tactics to harm. Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development (Print), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/26904586.2023.2177233

71.

Stark

(2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.

72.

Swedish Gender Equality Agency. (2022). Uppgifter om våld är inget undantag. Redovisning av kartläggning av uppgifter om våld eller andra övergrepp i mål om vårdnad, boende och umgänge. (Rapport 2022:1). https://jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se/media/wwrjf1il/rapport-2022-1-uppgifter-om-vald-ar-inget-undantag.pdf

73.

Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. https://www.vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2017-08-31-good-research-practice.html

74.

Sweet

P. L.

(2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843

75.

Toews

Bermea

(2017). I was naive in thinking, ‘I divorced this man, he is out of my life’”: A qualitative exploration of post- separation power and control tactics experienced by women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(14), 2166–2189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591278

76.

Weller

(2017). Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505

77.

Wemrell

Stjernlöf

Aenishänslin

M. L.

Garcia

Ivert

A.-K.

(2019). Towards understanding the Nordic paradox: A review of qualitative interview studies on intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) in Sweden. Sociology Compass, 13, e12699. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12699

78.

Wendt Höjer

(2002). Rädslans politik: våld och sexualitet i den svenska demokratin. Liber.

79.

WHO. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Written by World Health Organization, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC). ISBN 978 92 4 156462 5.

80.

WHO. (2020). Violence against women. Website, downloaded 2020-02-07: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

81.

Zeoli

Ricera

Sullivan

Kubiak

(2013). Post-Separation abuse of women and their children: Boundary-setting and family court utilization among victimized mothers. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9528-7

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB