The Impacts of Conservatism,Social Dominance,and Rape Myth Acceptance on Blame Attribution in Ambiguous Rape Scenarios

Abstract

Participants (N = 496) reviewed an ambiguous rape scenario involving a “perpetrator,” either in a high or low authority position, and a “victim,” who had or had not consumed alcohol. They indicated whether they viewed what happened as rape, and rated the perceived responsibility of the individuals involved. They also completed Conservatism and Rape Myth Acceptance (RMA) scales. Most believed the scenario to constitute rape. Perpetrator responsibility ratings were highest in the high-authority condition, and victims were assigned greater responsibility when they had consumed alcohol. Those who scored higher on the Conservatism/RMA scale attributed less responsibility to the perpetrator and more responsibility to the victim across all conditions.

Keywords

rape myths conservatism gender roles alcohol consumption ambiguous rape scenarios

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

(2011). Alcohol’s role in sexual violence perpetration: Theoretical explanations, existing evidence, and future directions. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(5), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00296.x

Alhabib

Nur

Jone

(2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9298-4

Altemeyer

(1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2

Barn

Powers

R. A.

(2018). Rape myth acceptance in contemporary times: A comparative study of university students in India and the United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), 3514–3536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518775750

Barnett

M. D.

Hillz

E. N.

(2018). The psychology of the politics of rape: Political ideology, moral foundations, and attitudes toward rape. Violence Against Women, 24(5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217708887

Bongiorno

McKimmie

B. M.

Masser

B. M.

(2016). The selective use of rape-victim stereotypes to protect culturally similar perpetrators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316631932

Carlson

G. C.

Duckworth

M. P.

(2016). Sexual victimization and benefit expectations of risky behavior among female college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(8), 1543–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651626

Chapleau

K. M.

Oswald

D. L.

Russel

B. L.

(2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313529

Chen

S. Y.

Urminsky

(2019). The role of causal beliefs in political identity and voting. Cognition, 188(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.003

10.

Clifford

Iyengar

Cabeza

Sinnott-Armstrong

(2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1178–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2

11.

Conaghan

Russel

(2014). Rape myths, law, and feminist research: ‘Myths about myths’? Feminist Legal Studies, 22(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-014-9259-z

12.

Cook

S. L.

Gidycz

C. A.

Koss

M. P.

Murphy

(2011). Emerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization. Violence Against Women, 17(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210397741

13.

Davies

Bailey

(2018). Police leadership: The challenges for developing contemporary practice. International Journal of Emergency Services, 7(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-04-2017-0022

14.

Davies

Gilston

Rogers

(2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281

15.

Deming

M. E.

Covan

E. K.

Swan

S. C.

Billings

D. L.

(2013). Exploring rape myths, gendered norms, group processing, and the social context of rape among college women: A qualitative analysis. Violence Against Women, 19(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213487044

16.

Dinos

Burrowes

Hammond

Cunliffe

(2015). A systematic review of juries’ assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making? International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, 34(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001

17.

Dowds

(2019). Towards a contextual definition of rape: Consent, coercion, and constructive force. The Modern Law Review, 83(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12461

18.

Edwards

K. M.

Turchik

J. A.

Dardis

C. M.

Reynolds

Gidyes

C. A.

(2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65(11), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2

19.

Eisele

Vachon

Lafit

Kuppens

Houben

Myin-Germeys

Viechtbauer

(2022). The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population. Assessment, 29(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120957102

20.

Gerger

Kley

Bohner

Siebler

(2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33(1), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195

21.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

22.

Gravelin

C. R.

Biernat

Bucher

C. E.

(2019). Blaming the victim of acquaintance rape: Individual, situational, and sociocultural factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02422

23.

Gray

J. M.

(2014). What constitutes a ‘reasonable belief’ in consent to sex? A thematic analysis. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.900122

24.

Grubb

Turner

(2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002

25.

Hayes

R. M.

Abbott

R. L.

Cook

(2016). It’s her fault: Student acceptance of rape myths on two college campuses. Violence Against Women, 22(13), 1540–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216630147

26.

Hayes

R. M.

Lorenz

Bell

K. A.

(2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113484788

27.

Hine

Murphy

(2019). The influence of ‘high’ vs. ‘low’ rape myth acceptance on police officers’ judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and rape authenticity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.08.001

28.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

29.

Hockett

J. M.

Smith

S. J.

Klausing

C. D.

Saucier

D. A.

(2016). Rape myth consistency and gender differences in perceiving rape victims: A meta-analysis. Violence Against Women, 22(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215607359

30.

Jozkowski

K. N.

Marcantonio

T. L.

Hunt

M. E.

(2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation: Sexual consent and sexual double standards. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041

31.

Klement

K. R.

Sagarin

B. J.

Skowronski

J. J.

(2019). Accusers lie and other myths: Rape myth acceptance predicts judgments made about accusers and accused perpetrators in a rape case. Sex Roles, 81(1–2), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0950-4

32.

Kugler

Jost

J. T.

Noorbaloochi

(2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5

33.

Larsen

E. L.

Smorawski

G. A.

Kragbak

K. L.

Stock

(2016). Students’ drinking behavior and perceptions towards introducing alcohol policies on university campus in Denmark: A focus group study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 11(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-016-0060-7

34.

Leverick

(2020). What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making? The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720923157

35.

Milesi

Süssenbach

Bohner

Megías

J. L.

(2019). The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2622

36.

Monk

Jones

(2014). Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for sexual assault: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 23(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.01.015

37.

Nicol

A. A. M.

De France

(2016). The Big Five’s relation with the facets of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.062

38.

Papp

L. J.

Erchull

M. J.

(2016). Objectification and system justification impact rape avoidance behaviors. Sex Roles, 76(1–2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0660-8

39.

Reling

T. T.

Barton

M. S.

Becker

Valasik

M. A.

(2018). Rape myths and hookup culture: An exploratory study of U.S. college students’ perceptions. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 78(7–8), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0813-4

40.

Rempala

D. M.

Okdie

B. M.

Garvey

K. J.

(2016). Articulating ideology: How liberals and conservatives justify political affiliations using morality-based explanations. Motivation and Emotion, 40(5), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9563-9

41.

Reynolds

C. J.

Makhanova

B. K. L.

Conway

(2020). Bound together for God and country: The binding moral foundations link unreflectiveness with religiosity and political conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 155(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109632

42.

Riley

C. E.

Yamawaki

(2018). Who is helpful? Examining the relationship between ambivalent sexism, right-wing authoritarianism, and intentions to help domestic violence victims. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018781899

43.

Romero-Sánchez

Krahé

Moya

Megías

J. L.

(2018). Alcohol-related victim behavior and rape myth acceptance as predictors of victim blame in sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 24(9), 1052–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217727372

44.

Sommer

Reynolds

J. J.

Kehn

(2015). Mock juror perceptions of rape victims: Impact of case characteristics and individual differences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(17), 2847–2866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515581907

45.

Stoll

L. C.

Lilley

T. G.

Pinter

(2017). Gender-blind sexism and rape myth acceptance. Violence Against Women, 23(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216636239

46.

Suarez

Gadalla

T. M.

(2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503

47.

Taschler

West

(2017). Contact with counter-stereotypical women predicts less sexism, less rape myth acceptance, less intention to rape (in men) and less projected enjoyment of rape (in women). Sex Roles, 76(7–8), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0679-x

48.

Umphress

E. E.

Smith-Crowe

Brief

A. P.

Dietz

Watkins

M. B.

(2007). When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.396

49.

Van Der Bruggen

Grubb

(2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008

50.

Vonderhaar

R. L.

Carmody

D. C.

(2014). There are no ‘innocent victims’: The influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(10), 1615–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549196

51.

Walby

Towers

(2017). Measuring violence to end violence: Mainstreaming gender. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X14913081639155

52.

Walters

M. A.

Tumath

(2014). Gender ‘hostility’, rape, and the hate crime paradigm. The Modern Law Review, 77(4), 563–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12079

53.

Wegner

Abbey

Pierce

Pegram

S. E.

Woerner

(2015). Sexual assault perpetrators’ justifications for their actions: Relationships to rape supportive attitudes, incident characteristics, and future perpetration. Violence Against Women, 21(8), 1018–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215589380

54.

Worthen

M. G. F.

(2021). Rape myth acceptance among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and mostly heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 232–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517733282