Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-11
The Working Relationship Between Emergency Room Nurses and Medical Rape Victim Advocates: A Qualitative Examination of Nurses’ Perceptions of the Influence of Nurse Training and Experience on Nurse–Advocate Interactions
Nurses and medical advocates respond to sexual assault survivors seeking hospital services. Ideally, both providers work collaboratively. However, this does not always happen. Extant research on the nurse–advocate relationship focuses on Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs). This study examines how ER nurses perceive their training and experience influence the working relationships between emergency room (ER) nurses (not exclusively SANEs) and medical advocates. Key findings indicate nurses perceive increased training improves (a) role understanding, (b) trust, (c) respect, (d) rapport, and (e) appreciation. Less training was associated with poorer role understanding and trust.
AhrensC. E.CampbellR.WascoS. M.AponteG.GrubsteinL.DavidsonW. S. (2000). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: An alternative approach to medical service delivery for rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(9), 921–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626000015009002
2.
CampbellR. (2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence & Victims, 20(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2005.20.1.55
3.
CampbellR. (2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems: Do rape victim advocates make a difference?Violence Against Women, 12(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205277539
4.
CampbellR.BybeeD. (1997). Emergency medical services for rape victims: Detecting the cracks in service delivery. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 3(2), 75–101.
5.
CampbellR.BybeeD.FordK.PattersonD. (2008). Systems change analysis of SANE programs: Identifying the mediating mechanisms of criminal justice system impact.U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/226497.pdf.
6.
CampbellR.MartinP. Y. (2001). Services for sexual assault survivors: The role of rape crisis centers. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L., & BergenR. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 227–241). Sage.
7.
CampbellR.PattersonD.LichtyL. (2005). The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: A review of psychological, medical, legal, and community outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005280328
8.
CampbellR.RajaS. (1999). The secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence & Victims, 14(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.3.261
9.
CampbellR.RajaS. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00171.x
10.
ColeJ. (2018). Structural, organizational, and interpersonal factors influencing interprofessional collaboration on sexual assault response teams. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2682–2703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516628809
11.
ColeJ.LoganT. K. (2008). Negotiating the challenges of multidisciplinary responses to sexual assault victims: Sexual assault nurse examiner and victim advocacy programs. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20234
12.
CorriganR. (2013). Up against a wall: Rape reform and the failure of success. NYU Press.
13.
DelgadilloD. (2017). When there is no sexual assault nurse examiner: Emergency nursing care for female adult sexual assault patients. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 43(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2016.11.006
14.
Foster-FishmanP. G.BerkowitzS. L.LounsburyD. W.JacobsonS.AllenN. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010378613583
15.
GreesonM. R.CampbellR. (2015). Coordinated community efforts to respond to sexual assault: A national study of sexual assault response team implementation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(14), 2470–2487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553119
16.
HoffmanE. E.WegrzynA.GreesonM. R.ZinterK. E.TullP.LaydenS.BalataM. (2022). Nurses’ perceptions of helpful and unhelpful communication from rape victim advocates. Psychology of Violence.
17.
KornbluhM. (2015). Combatting challenges to establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1021941
18.
KrauseC.JonesC.JoyceS.KuhnM.CurtinK.MurphyL.KrauseC.BoanB.LucasD. (2006). The impact of a multidisciplinary, integrated approach on improving the health and quality of care for individuals dealing with multiple chronic conditions. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.109
LongL. (2020). Rape medical advocates experiences with vicarious trauma, burnout, and self-care. Journal Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 29(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1578315
23.
MacyR. J.JohnsN.RizoC. F.MartinS. L.GiattinaM. (2011). Domestic violence and sexual assault service goal priorities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(16), 3361–3382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510393003
24.
MaierS. L. (2011a). Sexual assault nurse examiners’ perceptions of their relationship with doctors, rape victim advocates, police, and prosecutors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(7), 1314–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511425242
25.
MaierS. L. (2011b). We belong to them”: The costs of funding for rape crisis centers. Violence Against Women, 17(11), 1383–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211428599
26.
MaierS. L. (2011c). The emotional challenges faced by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners: “ER nursing is stressful on a good day without rape victims.”Journal of Forensic Nursing, 7(4), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1111.j.1939-3938.2011.01118.x
27.
MartinP. Y. (2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. Routledge.
28.
Molina-MulaJ.Gallo-EstradaJ.Perelló-CampanerC. (2017). Impact of interprofessional relationships from nurses’ perspective on the decision-making capacity of patients in a clinical setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010049
29.
MorrowS. L. (2007). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: Conceptual foundations. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286990
30.
MoylanC. A.LindhorstT. (2015). “Catching flies with honey”: The management of conflict in sexual assault response teams. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(11), 1945–1964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549464
31.
MoylanC. A.LindhorstT.TajimaE. A. (2017). Contested discourses in multidisciplinary sexual assault response teams (SARTs). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515585530
32.
MullaS. (2016). The violence of care: Rape victims, forensic nurses, and sexual assault intervention. New York University Press.
NowellB. (2009). Profiling capacity for coordination and systems change: The relative contribution of stakeholder relationships in interorganizational collaboratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3-4), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9276-2
35.
Office on Violence Against Women. (2013). A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations: Adults/adolescents second edition (No. 228119). Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
PattersonD. (2014). Interdisciplinary team communication among forensic nurses and rape victim advocates. Social Work in Health Care, 53(4), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2014.884040
37.
PattersonD.GreesonM. R.CampbellR. (2009). Understanding rape survivors’ decisions not to seek help from formal social systems. Health & Social Work, 34(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/34.2.127
38.
PattersonD.PennefatherM. (2015). Interdisciplinary team conflicts among forensic nurses and rape victim advocates. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 30(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109914531955
39.
PayneB. K. (2007). Victim advocates’ perceptions of the role of health care workers in sexual assault cases. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403406294900
40.
SchenkelL. S.WilknissS. M.SavitzA.SpauldingW. D.SilversteinS. M. (2020). The effects of a staff-training program in behavior management and social-learning principles on staff–patient interactions within a psychiatric rehabilitation inpatient unit. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 90(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000443
41.
SimsS.HewittG.HarrisR. (2014). Evidence of collaboration, pooling of resources, learning and role blurring in interprofessional healthcare teams: A realist synthesis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.939745
42.
SuenL.HuangH.LeeH. (2014). A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Hu Li Za Zhi, 61(3), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105
43.
SullivanC. M.GoodmanL. A.VirdenT.StromJ.RamirezR. (2018). Evaluation of the effects of receiving trauma-informed practices on domestic violence shelter residents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 88(5), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000286
44.
ThiedeE.MiyamotoS. (2021). Rural availability of sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs). The Journal of Rural Health: Official Journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 37(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12544
45.
TiryE.ZweigJ.WalshK.FarrellL.YuL. (2020). Beyond forensic evidence: Examining sexual assault medical forensic exam mechanisms that influence sexual assault case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7-8), 886260520961870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520961870
46.
United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2018). Sexual assault: Information on the availability of forensic examiners. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, 1–9. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-259t.pdf.
WilliamsJ. E. (1984). Secondary victimization: Confronting public attitudes about rape. Victimology: An International Journal, 9(1), 66–81.
49.
WiltK. (2019). Comprehensive services for survivors of sexual violence. Resource Sharing Project and National Sexual Violence Resource Center. https://www.nsvrc.org/comprehensive-services.
50.
ZakocsR. C.EdwardsE. M. (2006). What explains community coalition effectiveness?: A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004
51.
ZijlstraJ.Lo Fo WongS.TeerlingA.HutschemaekersG.Lagro-JanssenA. (2018). Challenges in interprofessional collaboration: Experiences of care providers and policymakers in a newly set-up Dutch assault centre. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.1243
