In sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs, specially trained forensic nurses provide 24-hour-a-day, first-response medical care and crisis intervention to rape survivors in either hospitals or clinic settings. This article reviews the empirical literature regarding the effectiveness of SANE programs in five domains:(a) promoting the psychological recovery of survivors, (b) providing comprehensive and consistent postrape medical care (e.g., emergency contraception, sexually transmitted disease [STD] prophylaxis), (c) documenting the forensic evidence of the crime completely and accurately, (d) improving the prosecution of sexual assault cases by providing better forensics and expert testimony, and (e) creating community change by bringing multiple service providers together to provide comprehensive care to rape survivors. Preliminary evidence suggests that SANE programs are effective in all domains, but such conclusions are tentative because most published studies have not included adequate methodological controls to rigorously test the effectiveness of SANE programs. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Ahrens, C. E.
, Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Aponte, G., Grubstein, L., & Davidson, W. S. (2000). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: An alternative approach to medical service delivery for rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 921-943.
2.
Aiken, M. M.
, & Speck, P. M. (1995). Sexual assault and multiple trauma: A sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) challenge. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 2, 466-468.
3.
Amey, A. L.
, & Bishai, D. (2002). Measuring the quality of medical care for women who experience sexual assault with data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39, 631-638.
4.
Antognoli-Toland, P.
(1985). Comprehensive program for examination of sexual assault victims by nurses: A hospital-based project in Texas. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 11, 132-135.
5.
Arndt, S.
(1988). Nurses help Santa Cruz sexual assault survivors. California Nurse, 84(5), 4-5.
6.
Campbell, R.
(2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence & Victims, 20, 55-68.
7.
Campbell, R.
, & Raja, S. (1999). The secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence & Victims, 14, 261-275.
8.
Campbell, R.
, & Raja, S. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97-106.
9.
Campbell, R.
, Sefl, T., Barnes, H. E., Ahrens, C. E., Wasco, S. M., & Zaragoza-Diesfeld, Y. (1999). Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 847-858.
10.
Campbell, R.
, Townsend, S. M., Long, S. M., Kinnison, K. E., Pulley, E. M., Adames, S. B., et al. (2005). Organizational characteristics of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: Results from the national survey. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 157-64.
11.
Campbell, R.
, Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.
12.
Ciancone, A.
, Wilson, C., Collette, R., & Gerson, L. W. (2000). Sexual assault nurse examiner programs in the United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 35, 353-357.
13.
Cornell, D.
(1998). Helping victims of rape: A program called SANE. New Jersey Medicine, 2, 45-46.
14.
Crandall, C.
, & Helitzer, D. (2003). Impact evaluation of a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program (NIJ Document No. 203276). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15.
Derhammer, F.
, Lucente, V., Reed, J., & Young, M. (2000). Using a SANE interdisciplinary approach to care of sexual assault victims. The Journal on Quality Improvement, 26, 488-495.
16.
DiNitto, D.
, Martin, P. Y., Norton, D. B., & Maxwell, M. S. (1986). After rape: Who should examine rape survivors?American Journal of Nursing, 86(5), 538-540.
17.
Ericksen, J.
, Dudley, C., McIntosh, G., Ritch, L., Shumay, S., & Simpson, M. (2002). Clients’ experiences with a specialized sexual assault service. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 28, 86-90.
18.
Frazier, P. A.
, & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives.Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607-628.
19.
Fulginiti, T. P.
, Seibert, E., Firth, V., Quattrone, J., Harner, L., Webb, J., et al. (1996). A SANE experience in a community hospital: Doylestown’s first six months. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 22, 422-425.
20.
Hatmaker, D.
, Pinholster, L., & Saye, J. (2002). A community-based approach to sexual assault. Public Health Nursing, 19, 124-127.
21.
Hohenhaus, S.
(1998). Sexual assault: Clinical issues, SANE legislation and lessons learned. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 24, 463-464.
22.
Hutson, L. A.
(2002). Development of sexual assault nurse examiner programs. Emergency Nursing, 37, 79-88.
23.
International Association of Forensic Nurses (IAFN). (2005). Database of the International Association of Forensic Nurses. Retrieved on April 8, 2005 from http://www.forensicnurse.org
24.
LaFree, G.
(1980). Variables affecting guilty pleas and convictions in rape cases: Toward a social theory of rape processing. Social Forces, 58, 833-850.
25.
Lang, K.
(1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner resource guide for Michigan communities. Okemos: Michigan Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence.
26.
Ledray, L. E.
(1992). The sexual assault nurse clinician: A fifteen-year experience in Minneapolis. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 18, 217-222.
27.
Ledray, L. E.
(1995). Sexual assault evidentiary exam and treatment protocol. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 21, 355-359.
28.
Ledray, L. E.
(1996). The sexual assault resource service: A new model of care. Minnesota Medicine, 79, 43-45.
29.
Ledray, L. E.
(1997a). SANE program locations: Pros and cons. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 23, 182-186.
30.
Ledray, L. E.
(1997b). SANE program staff: Selection, training, and salaries. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 23, 491-495.
31.
Ledray, L. E.
(1998) Sexual assault: Clinical issues, SANE expert and factual testimony. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 24, 284-287.
32.
Ledray, L. E.
(1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development and operations guide. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice.
33.
Ledray, L. E.
(2000). Is the SANE role within the scope of nursing practice? On “pelvics,”“colposcopy,” and “dispensing of medications.”Journal of Emergency Nursing, 26, 79-81.
34.
Ledray, L. E.
, & Arndt, S. (1994). Examining the sexual assault victim: A new model for nursing care. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 32, 7-12.
35.
Ledray, L. E.
, & Barry, L. (1998). SANE expert and factual testimony. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 24, 3-3.
36.
Ledray, L. E.
, Faugno, D., & Speck, P. (2001). SANE: Advocate, forensic technician, nurse?Journal of Emergency Nursing, 27, 91-93.
37.
Ledray, L. E.
, & Netzel, L. (1997). DNA evidence collection. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 23, 156-158.
38.
Ledray, L. E.
, & Simmelink, K. (1997). Efficacy of SANE evidence collection: A Minnesota study. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 23, 75-77.
39.
Lenehan, G.
(1991). Sexual assault nurse examiners: A SANE way to care for rape victims. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 17, 1-2.
40.
Littel, K.
(2001). Sexual assault nurse examiner programs: Improving the community response to sexual assault victims. Office for Victims of Crime Bulletin, 4, 1-19.
41.
Madigan, L.
, & Gamble, N. (1991). The second rape: Society’s continued betrayal of the victim. New York: Macmillan.
42.
Malloy, M. (1991). Relationship of nurse identified therapeutic techniques to client satisfaction reports in a crisis program. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
43.
Martin, P. Y.
(2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. New York: Routledge.
44.
Martin, P. Y.
, & Powell, R. M. (1994). Accounting for the second assault: Legal organizations framing of rape victims. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853-890.
45.
Mouradian, V. E.
, Mechanic, M. B., & Williams, L. M. (2001). Recommendations for establishing and maintaining successful researcher-practitioner collaborations. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College, National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center.
46.
National Victim Center
. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: Author.
47.
O’Brien, C.
(1996). Sexual assault nurse examiner program coordinator. Emergency Nurses Association, 22, 532-533.
48.
O’Brien, C.
(1998). Light staining microscope: Clinical experience in a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 24, 95-97.
49.
Resnick, H. S.
, Holmes, M. M., Kilpatrick, D. G., Clum, G., Acierno, R., Best, C. L., et al. (2000). Predictors of post-rape medical care in a national sample of women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 214-219.
50.
Riger, S.
(1999). Working together: Challenges in collaborative research on violence against women. Violence Against Women, 5, 1099-1117.
51.
Rossman, L.
, & Dunnuck, C. (1999). A community sexual assault program based in urban YWCA: The Grand Rapids experience. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 25, 424-427.
52.
Rovi, S.
, & Shimoni, N. (2002). Prophylaxis provided to sexual assault victims seen at U.S. emergency departments. Journal of American Medical Women’s Association, 57, 204-207.
53.
Selig, C.
(2000). Sexual assault nurse examiner and sexual assault response team (SANE/SART) program. Nursing Clinics of North America, 35, 311-319.
54.
Seneski, P.
(1992). Multi-disciplinary program helps sexual assault victims. The American College of Physician Executives, pp. 417-418.
55.
Sievers, V.
, Murphy, S., & Miller, J. (2003). Sexual assault evidence collection more accurate when completed by sexual assault nurse examiners: Colorado’s experience. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 29, 511-514.
56.
Sievers, V.
, & Stinson, S. (2002). Excellence in forensic practice: Aclinical ladder model for recruiting and retaining sexual assault nurse examiners. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 28, 172-174.
57.
Smith, K.
, Homseth, J.Macgregor, M., & Letourneau, M. (1998). Sexual assault response team: Overcoming obstacles to program development. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 24, 365-367.
58.
Smugar, S. S.
, Spina, B. J., & Merz, J. F. (2000). Informed consent for emergency contraception: Variability in hospital care of rape victims. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1372-1376.
59.
Solola, A.
, Scott, C., Severs, H., & Howell, J. (1983). Rape: Management in a non-institutional setting. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 61, 373-378.
60.
Spohn, C.
, Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prose-cutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice.”Social Problems, 48(2), 206-235.
61.
Spohn, C.
, & Horney, J. (1992). Rape law reform: A grassroots revolution and its impact. New York: Plenum.
62.
Sullivan, C. M.
, & Cain, D. (2004). Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 603-618.
63.
Taylor, W. K.
(2002). Collecting evidence for sexual assault: The role of the sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE). International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 78, S91-S94.
64.
Uttley, L.
, & Petraitis, C. (2000). Rape survivors and emergency contraception: Substandard care at hospital emergency rooms. Prochoice Ideas, pp. 3-4.
65.
Voelker, R.
(1996). Experts hope team approach will improve the quality of rape exams. Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 973-974.
66.
Weiss, C. H.
(1983). Ideology, interest, and information: The basis of policy decisions. In D. Callahan & B.Jennings (Eds.), Ethics, the social sciences and policy analysis (pp. 213-245). New York: Plenum.
67.
Williams, J. E.
(1984). Secondary victimization: Confronting public attitudes about rape. Victimology: An International Journal, 9, 66-81.
68.
Young, W.
, Bracken, A., Goddard, M., & Matheson, S. (1992). Sexual assault: Review of a national model protocol for forensic and medical evaluation. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80, 878-883.
