Campus sexual misconduct (CSM) continues to be a significant public health concern on U.S. college campuses. Updates to Title IX now allow informal resolution of reported cases of CSM, including the use of restorative justice (RJ) processes. This qualitative study sought to understand the experiences of early adopters of RJ for CSM through semistructured interviews with 10 current and former administrators who have adopted RJ for CSM. Findings suggest that RJ for CSM is a promising practice, one which requires key stakeholder engagement, thoughtful training for RJ facilitators, and extensive preparation of the parties for successful implementation.
BrubakerS. J.ManciniC. (2017). The impact of increased state regulation of campus sexual assault practices: Perspectives of campus personnel. Journal of School Violence, 16(3), 286–301.
DavisF. E. (2019). The little book of race and restorative justice: Black lives, healing, and US social transformation. Simon and Schuster.
8.
GangD.LoffB.NaylorB.KirkmanM. (2021). A call for evaluation of restorative justice programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(1), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019833003
9.
GentileK. (2018). Assembling justice: Reviving nonhuman subjectivities to examine institutional betrayal around sexual misconduct. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 66(4), 647–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065118797138
10.
HruschkaD. J.SchwartzD.St. JohnD. C.Picone-DecaroE.JenkinsR. A.CareyJ. W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04266540
11.
JavorkaM.CampbellR. (2021). “This isn't just a police issue”: Tensions between criminal justice and university responses to sexual assault among college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 67(1-2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12448
12.
KarpD. R.Shackford-BradleyJ.WilsonR. J.WilliamsenK. M.LlewellynJ. J.KallemH.KossM. P. (2016). CAMPUS PRISM: A report on promoting restorative initiatives for sexual misconduct on college campuses. University of San Diego.http://www.skidmore.edu/campusrj/documents/Campus_PRISM__Report_2016.pdf
13.
KimJ.ChesworthB.Franchino-OlsenH.MacyR. J. (2022). A scoping review of vicarious trauma interventions for service providers working with people who have experienced traumatic events. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(5), 1437–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838021991310
14.
KimM. E. (2020). Anti-carceral feminism: The contradictions of progress and the possibilities of counter-hegemonic struggle. Affilia, 35(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919878276
15.
KossM. P.WilgusJ. K.WilliamsenK. M. (2014). Campus sexual misconduct: Restorative justice approaches to enhance compliance with Title IX guidance. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521500
16.
McGlynnC. (2011). Feminism, rape and the search for justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31(4), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqr025
17.
MéndezX. (2020). Beyond Nassar: A transformative justice and decolonial feminist approach to campus sexual assault. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 41(2), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.41.2.0082
18.
MitchellH. B. (2020). Choosing Restorative Justice: Situational and individual influences after experiencing campus sexual misconduct [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].University of Akron.
OudshoornJ.AmstutzL. S.JackettM. (2015). The little book of restorative justice for sexual abuse: hope through trauma. Simon and Schuster.
21.
RichardsT. N.BranchK. A.Fleury-SteinerR. E.KafonekK. (2017). A feminist analysis of campus sexual assault policies: Results from a national sample. Family Relations, 66(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12236
22.
SabinaC.HoL. Y. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521322
23.
StebbinsR. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (Vol. 48). Sage.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
26.
ThorsborneM.BloodP. (2013). Implementing restorative practices in schools: A practical guide to transforming school communities. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
27.
UmbreitM.ArmourM. (2011). Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice. Springer.
WilliamsenK. M. (2017). “The Exact Opposite of What They Need.” Administrator Reflections on Sexual Misconduct, the Limitations of the Student Conduct Response, and the Possibilities of Restorative Justice [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota.
30.
ZehrH. (2015). The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated. Skyhorse Publishing.
