Campus Information Sharing and Responses to Sexual Misconduct Violations: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing public interest in how college and university administrators respond to sexual misconduct. Despite policy changes in this area, minimal research exists on how institutions of higher education (IHEs) are sharing and processing information about students found responsible for sexual misconduct. Aiming to establish some of the key questions and parameters in this line of research, this practitioner–researcher collaboration offers a first look at how IHEs share information about students who have been found responsible both within their campus and between campuses, as well as how IHEs respond when that information is shared (e.g., admitting a student applicant who has been previously sanctioned for a sexual misconduct violation). Practitioners designed and disseminated a questionnaire to campus administrators, including Title IX coordinators and student conduct administrators, via higher education association listservs. Exploratory results from 176 participants showed that 80% reported having some form of policy regarding sharing information within their institution, while approximately half have policies regarding sharing information to other IHEs regarding students found responsible of sexual misconduct. Nearly one-third of participants reported that their IHEs are engaging in campus information sharing through the use of transcript notation. In terms of IHEs receiving information about student applicants having been previously sanctioned for a sexual misconduct violation, approximately one-fourth of participants indicated their IHE has chosen not to accept a student for this reason within the past 5 years, and a quarter of IHEs have accepted such students. For those IHEs that have accepted a student previously found responsible, the majority of IHEs are not following the outcomes of these students, indicating an unknown in terms of whether information sharing policies were effective. As a result, preliminary findings suggest that more evaluation research is needed before any further policies are mandated.

Keywords

campus sexual misconduct campus information sharing transcript notation institutions of higher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AACRAO . (2015). (2015, June). U.S. Higher education transcript practices and best practice opinions: Results of the AACRAOAcademic record and transcript survey. https://www.aacrao.org/docs/default-source/research-docs/2015-u-s-higher-education-transcript-practices-and-best-practice-opinions–-june-201582c7f86f39a34dd9930c84745383b506.pdf?Status=Temp&sfvrsn=c2ab0a3b_4

AACRAO . (2017, June). Transcript disciplinary notations: Guidance to AACRAO members. https://www.aacrao.org/docs/default-source/signature-initiative-docs/disciplinary-notations/notations-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=ecfe2557_0

Anderson

R. E.

Silver

K. E.

Ciampaglia

A. M.

Vitale

A. M.

Delahanty

D. L

(2019). The frequency of sexual perpetration in college men: A systematic review of reported prevalence rates from 2000 to 2017. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 22(3):481–495. (Online First). https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019860619

Association for Student Conduct Administration (2014, July). Student conduct administration & transcript notation: Issues and practices. https://www.theasca.org/files/BestPractices/TranscriptNotation-FinalReport.pdf

ATIXA . (2015, September 22). ATIXA position statement in favor of notation of expulsion and suspension on college and university transcripts. https://cdn.atixa.org/websitemedia/atixa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/12193636/ATIXA-Position-Statement-on-Transcript-Notation-FINAL.pdf

ATSA . (2019). Public policy recommendation: Addressing campus sexual misconduct. https://www.atsa.com/pdfs/Policy/AddressingCampusSexualMisconductFINAL.pdf

Clery

(2018). Disclosure of campus security policy and campus crime statistics act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. §1092(f).

Code of Virginia §23.1-900 (2015). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title23.1/chapter9/section23.1-900/

de Brey

Lauren

Joel

M. F.

Sidney

W. F.

Melissa

Anlan

Claire

Xiaolei

(2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018. NCES 2019–038. National center for education statistics.

10.

Freeman

A. N.

Freeman

(2016). It’s about power, not policy: Movement lawyering for large-scale social change. Clinical L. Rev, 23(1), 147. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2951392

11.

H. B. 1203 . (PA 2015). https://trackbill.com/bill/pennsylvania-house-bill-1203-an-act-providing-for-notation-on-transcripts-of-students-suspended-or-expelled-from-institutions-of-higher-education/1185632/

12.

H. B. 449 . (TX 2019) https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/html/HB00449F.htm

13.

Henkle

Dulap

Tabachnick

(2020). Expanding the frame: Institutional responses to students accused of sexual misconduct. National association of student personnel administrators (NASPA). https://www.naspa.org/report/expanding-the-frame-institutional-responses-to-students-accused-of-sexual-misconduct

14.

Know Your IX (n.d.). Transcript notations. https://www.knowyourix.org/issues/transcript-notations/

15.

Koss

M. P.

Gidycz

C. A.

Wisniewski

(1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.55.2.162

16.

Koss

M. P.

Wilgus

J. K.

Williamsen

K. M.

(2014). Campus sexual misconduct: Restorative justice approaches to enhance compliance with Title IX guidance. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521500

17.

Krebs

C. P.

Lindquist

C. H.

Warner

T. D.

Fisher

B. S.

Martin

S. L.

(2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study. National institute of justice.

18.

Krebs

C. P.

Lindquist

C. H.

Warner

T. D.

Fisher

B. S.

Martin

S. L.

(2009). College women’s experiences with physically forced, alcohol- or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57(6), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.57.6.639-649

19.

Kurlychek

M. C.

Johnson

B. D.

(2019). Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024815

20.

Lebioda

(2015). State policy proposals to combat campus sexual assault. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. https://www.aascu.org/policy/publications/policy-matters/campussexualassault.pdf

21.

Levenson

J. S.

(2018). Sex offender management policies and evidence-based recommendations for registry reform. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0884-0

22.

Lisak

Miller

P. M.

(2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.17.1.73.33638

23.

Lytle

(2019). Beyond panic: Variation in the legislative activity for sex offender registration and notification laws across states over time. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(3), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416678287

24.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2020). Digest of education statistics. U. S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/

25.

New law will mark student’s transcripts with disciplinary notations . (2019, June 27). 25 News KXXV.https://www.kxxv.com/hometown/texas/new-law-will-mark-students-transcripts-with-disciplinary-notations

26.

Northeast Iowa Community College (n.d.). Sex offender registrant request form. https://cm.maxient.com/reportingform.php?NortheastIowaCC&layout_id=13

27.

S.B. 5965 . (NY 2015). 2015-2016 Legislative Session. https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2015/S5965

28.

Strang

Peterson

Z. D.

(2013). The relationships among perceived peer acceptance of sexual aggression, punishment certainty, and sexually aggressive behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(18), 3369–3385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513502126

29.

Swartout

K. M.

White

M. P.

Thompson

J. W.

Abbey

M. P.

Bellis

A. L.

(2015). Trajectory analysis of the campus serial rapist assumption. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(12), 1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0707

30.

Tabachnick

(2013). Why prevention? Why now? International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8(3–4), 55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100984

31.

U. S. Center for Safe Sport (2021). Centralized disciplinary database. https://uscenterforsafesport.org/response-and-resolution/centralized-disciplinary-database/

32.

Walsh

Sarvet

A. L.

Wall

Gilbert

Santelli

Khan

Thompson

M. P.

Reardon

Hirsch

J. S.

Mellins

C. A.

(2019). Prevalence and correlates of sexual assault perpetration and ambiguous consent in a representative sample of college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), NP7005–NP7026. (Online First). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518823293

33.

White

J. W.

Smith

P. H.

(2004). Sexual assault perpetration and reperpetration: From adolescence to young adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(2), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854803261342

34.

Wilgus

Rider-Milkovich

Vander

(2014). National survey of sanctioning practices of students sexual misconduct at institutions of higher education. Presentation at the association for student conduct administration annual conference on february 6, 2014.