Sexual assaults are underreported to the police, even though this crime affects one in four college women. Using a vignette design, this study fills a gap in the literature by examining the influence of prior police perceptions, procedurally unjust treatment, and the sex of the responding officer on college women's likelihood to report sexual assault. Results indicate positive prior police perceptions significantly increase students’ perceived likelihood to report sexual victimization. Even when controlling for prior perceptions, procedurally unfair treatment significantly decreases the likelihood of future victimization reporting. Responding officer sex does not affect students’ decision to report.
AllenK. T.MeadowsE. A. (2017). The use of vignettes to empower effective responses to attempted sexual assault. Journal of American College Health, 65(4), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2016.1278376
3.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
4.
BoatengF. (2018). Crime reporting behavior: Do attitudes toward the police matter?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(18), 2891–2916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516632356
5.
BrownA. L.HortonJ.GuilloryA. (2018). The impact of victim alcohol consumption and perpetrator use of force on perceptions in an acquaintance rape vignette. Violence and Victims, 33(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.1.40
6.
BrubakerS. J.KeeganB.Guadalupe-DiazX. L.BeasleyB. (2017). Measuring and reporting campus sexual assault: Privilege and exclusion in what we know and what we do. Sociology Compass, 11(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12543
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). (2014). Special report: Rape and sexual victimization among college-aged females, 1995–2013(NCJ 24871). U.S. Department of Justice.
CookC. L.LaneJ. (2012). Examining differences in attitudes about sexual victimization among a sample of jail officers: The importance of officer gender and perceived inmate characteristics. Criminal Justice Review, 37(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016812436548
10.
DonnerC.MaskalyJ.FridellL.JenningsW. G. (2015). Policing and procedural justice: A state-of-the-art review. Policing, 38(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2014-0129
11.
ElliottI.ThomasS.OgloffJ. (2014). Procedural justice in victim-police interactions and victims’ recovery from victimization experiences. Policing and Society, 24(5), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784309
12.
FergusonC. E.MalouffJ. M. (2016). Assessing police classifications of sexual assault reports: A meta-analysis of false reporting rates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0666-2.
13.
FisherB.DaigleL.CullenF. (2010). Unsafe in the ivory tower: The sexual victimization of college women. Sage.
14.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
15.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802239161
16.
FlippinM.ReisigM. D.TrinknerR. (2019). The effect of procedural injustice during emergency 911 calls: A factorial vignette-based study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(4), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09369-y
17.
FranklinC. A.GarzaA. D. (2021). Sexual assault disclosure: The effect of victim race and perpetrator type on empathy, culpability, and service referral for survivors in a hypothetical scenario. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2327–2352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759656
18.
GauJ. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-013-9220-8
19.
GrahamA.KuligT. C.CullenF. T. (2019). Willingness to report crime to the police: Traditional crime, cybercrime, and procedural justice. Policing, 43(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2019-0115
20.
GreesonM. R.CampbellR.Fehler-CabralG. (2014). Cold or caring? Adolescent sexual assault victims’ perceptions of their interactions with the police. Violence and Victims, 29(4), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00039
21.
HenryT. K. S.FranklinT. W.FranklinC. A. (2021). Facilitating sexual assault reporting on the college campus: The role of procedural justice in bystander decisions to provide police referrals. Violence Against Women, 27(11), 2066–2091. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220954289
22.
HickmanL. J.SimpsonS. S. (2003). Fair treatment of preferred outcome? The impact of police behavior on victim reports of domestic violence incidents. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703005
23.
JacobsenS. K. (2015). Policing the ivory tower: Students’ perceptions of the legitimacy of campus police officers. Deviant Behavior, 36(4), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.935653
24.
JamesV. J.LeeD. R. (2015). Through the looking glass: Exploring how college students’ perceptions of the police influence sexual assault victimization reporting. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(14), 2447–2469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553116
KhanS. R.HirschJ. S.WamboldA.MellinsC. A. (2018). ‘I didn’t want to be ‘that girl’’: The social risks of labeling, telling, and reporting sexual assault. Sociological Science, 5, 432–460. https://doi.org/10.15195/v5.a19
27.
KimS.AlisonL.ChristiansenP. (2020). Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques to gather information from victims. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000222
28.
LockwoodD.ProhaskaA. (2015). Police officer gender and attitudes towards intimate partner violence: How policy can eliminate stereotypes. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 10(1), 77–90.
MaierS. L. (2008). “I have heard horrible stories…”: rape victim advocates’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14(7), 786–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208320245
MazerolleL.AntrobusE.BennettS.TylerT. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perception of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 51(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
33.
MeierK. J.Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00653.x
34.
MillerJ. L.PanM. J. (1987). Student perceptions of campus police: The effects of personal characteristics and police contacts. American Journal of Police, 6(2), 27–44.
35.
MooreB.BakerT. (2018). An exploratory examination of college students’ likelihood of reporting sexual assault to police and university officials: Results of a self-report survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3419–3438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516632357
36.
MorabitoM. S.PattavinaA.WilliamsL. M. (2017). Active representation and police response to sexual assault complaints. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1216730
37.
MurphyK. (2017). Challenging the ‘invariance’ thesis: Procedural justice policing and the moderating influence of trust on citizens’ obligation to obey police. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(3), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9298-y
38.
MurphyK.BarkworthJ. (2014). Victim willingness to report crime to police: Does procedural justice or outcome matter most?Victims and Offenders, 9(2), 178–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2013.872744
39.
Murphy-OikonenJ.McQueenK.MillerA.ChambersL.HiebertA. (2020). Unfounded sexual assault: Women’s experiences of not being believed by the police. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520978190
40.
NaginD. S.TelepC. W. (2020). Procedural justice and legal compliance: A revisionist perspective. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(3), 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12499
41.
NasonE. E.RinehartJ. K.YeaterE. A.NewlandsR. T.CrawfordJ. N. (2019). Prior sexual relationship, gender and sexual attitudes affect the believability of a hypothetical sexual assault vignette. Gender Issues, 36(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-018-9227-z
42.
NixJ.WolfeS. E.RojekJ.KaminskiR. J. (2015). Trust in the police: The influence of procedural justice and perceived collective efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 610–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714530548
OehmeK.SternN.MennickeA. (2015). A deficiency in addressing campus sexual assault: The lack of women law enforcement officers. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 38, 337–372. https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9963-2015004
45.
O’NealE. N.HayesB. E. (2020). “A rape is a rape, regardless of what the victim was doing at the time”: Detective views on how “problematic” victims affect sexual assault case processing. Criminal Justice Review, 45(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016819842639
46.
PattersonD. (2011). The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(2), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510362889
47.
ReisigM. D.BrattonJ.GertzM. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301275
48.
ReisigM. D.MaysR. D.TelepC. W. (2018). The effects of procedural injustice during police-citizen encounters: A factorial vignette study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9307-1
49.
RotenbergC. (2017). Police-reported sexual assaults in Canada, 2009 to 2014: A statistical profile. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
50.
SabinaC.HoL. Y. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521322
51.
SableM. R.DanisF.MauzyD. L.GallagherS. K. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162
SlocumL. A. (2018). The effect of prior police contact on victimization reporting: Results from the police—public contact and national crime victimization surveys. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(2), 535–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9345-x
54.
SpencerC.MalloryA.ToewsM.StithS.WoodL. (2017). Why sexual assault survivors do not report to universities: A feminist analysis. Family Relations, 66(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12241
55.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of the procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
56.
ThompsonM.SitterleD.ClayG.KingreeJ. (2007). Reasons for not reporting victimizations to the police: Do they vary for physical and sexual incidents?Journal of American College Health, 55(5), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.55.5.277-282
57.
TylerT. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830
58.
TylerT. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627
59.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
60.
TylerT. R. (2011). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton University Press.
61.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
62.
TylerT. R.FaganJ. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1), 231–275.
63.
TylerT. R.HuoY. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage.
64.
TylerT. R.JacksonJ. (2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In TankebeJ.LieblingA. (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford University Press.
WebsterW. S.OxburghG. E.DandoC. J. (2021). The use and efficacy of question type and an attentive interviewing style in adult rape interviews. Psychology. Crime & Law, 27(7), 656–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1849694
67.
WilliamsS. L.NofzigerS. (2003). Cops and the college crowd: Young adults and perceptions of police in a college town. Journal of Crime and Justice, 26(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2003.9721185
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
