Obtaining accurate survey data on the prevalence of woman abuse in institutions of higher education continues to be a major methodological challenge. Underreporting is difficult to overcome; yet, there may be effective ways of minimizing this problem. One is adding a supplementary open-ended question to a primarily quantitative questionnaire. Using data derived from the Campus Quality of Life Survey (CQLS), this article examines whether asking respondents to complete such a question increases the prevalence rates of four types of woman abuse and provides information on behaviors that are not included in widely used and validated measures of these harms.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2.
CantorD.FisherB.ChibnallS.HarpsS.TownsendR.ThomasG.HyunshikL.KranzV.HerbisonR.MaddenK. (2019). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and misconduct. Westat.
3.
Center for Research on Violence Against Women. (2014). Campus attitudes toward safety (C.A.T.S.) survey. University of Kentucky.
4.
CouperM. P.BosnjakM. (2010). Internet surveys. In MarsdenP. V.WrightJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 527–550). Emerald.
5.
DeKeseredyW. S. (1995). Enhancing the quality of survey data on woman abuse: Examples from a national Canadian study. Violence Against Women, 1(2), 158–173.
6.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2017). Using crime surveys as tools of critical insight and progressive change. In JacobsonM. H.WalklateS. (Eds.), Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research (pp. 31–48). Routledge.
7.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2019). Innovative methods of gathering survey data on violence against women. In DeflemM.SilvaD. (Eds.), Methods of criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 69–84). Emerald.
8.
DeKeseredyW. S.BurnhamK.NicewarnerR.NolanJ.Hall-SanchezA. (2019). Aggrieved entitlement in the ivory tower: Qualitative results from a large-scale campus climate survey. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 8(1), 3–20.
9.
DeKeseredyW. S.RennisonC. M. (2013). New directions in the social scientific study of separation/divorce assault. In RichardsK.TauriJ. (Eds.), Crime, justice and social democracy: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference, 2013 (Vol. 1, pp. 47–57). Crime and Justice Research Center, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.
10.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (1998). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian national survey. Sage.
11.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (2013). Male peer support & violence against women: The history & verification of a theory. Northeastern University Press.
12.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D.NolanJ.MastronN.Hall-SanchezA. (2019). Polyvictimization and the continuum of sexual abuse at a college campus: Does negative peer support increase the likelihood of multiple victimizations?British Journal of Criminology, 59(2), 276–295.
13.
JaquierV.JohnsonH.FisherB. S. (2011). Research methods, measures, and ethics. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L.Kennedy BergenR. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 23–45). Sage.
14.
JohnsonK. C.TaylorJ. S. (2017). The campus rape frenzy: The attack on due process at America’s universities. Encounter.
15.
KaukinenC.Hughes MillerM.PowersR. A. (Eds.). (2017). Addressing violence against women on college campuses. Temple University Press.
16.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM., et al. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370.
17.
KossM. P.GidyzC.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170.
18.
MeltonH. (2007). Predicting the occurrence of stalking in relationships characterized by domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(1), 13–25.
19.
MorganP. (2008). Sexual harassment. In RenzettiC. M.EdlesonJ. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of interpersonal violence (pp. 661–662). Sage.
20.
PedersenM. J.NielsenC. V. (2016). Improving survey response rates in online panels: Effects of low-cost incentives and cost-free text appeal interventions. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 229–243.
21.
PritchardA. J.DeKeseredyW. S.NolanJ.Hall-SanchezA. (2018). Who speaks first? Analyzing response waves in a large-scale campus climate survey. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28, 888–901. http://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1468374
22.
SmithM. D. (1987). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Toronto. Violence and Victims, 2(3), 173–187.
23.
SmithM. D. (1989). Woman abuse: The case for surveys by telephone. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4(3), 308–324.
24.
SmithM. D. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender & Society, 18(1), 109–127.
25.
StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(3), 465–479.
26.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
27.
WeissK. G. (2009). “Boys will be boys” and other gendered accounts: An exploration of victims’ excuses and justifications for unwanted sexual contact and coercion. Violence Against Women, 15(7), 810–834.
28.
WeissK. G. (2011). Neutralizing sexual victimization: A typology of victims’ non-reporting accounts. Theoretical Criminology, 15(4), 445–467.
29.
WoodL.SulleyC.Kammer-KerwickM.FollingstadD.Busch-ArmendarizN. (2017). Climate surveys: An inventory of understanding sexual assault and other crimes of interpersonal violence at institutions of higher education. Violence Against Women, 23(10), 1249–1267.
