This article investigates how the rape myths that underpinned the marital rape exemption in South Africa until 1993 have filtered into contemporary legal discourse. Through a feminist sociolegal framing, I integrate multidisciplinary tools that counter simplistic conceptions of rape myths and highlight how myths are locally and culturally contingent. With this foundation, I apply neutralization theory to the judicial language of marital rape cases to explicate how patriarchal caricatures of sexual violence transition from the social sphere into the legal sphere. This exercise illuminates how judges and rapists draw upon the same culturally sanctioned language and techniques to justify marital rape.
AndersonI.DohertyK. (2007). Accounting for rape: Psychology, feminism and discourse analysis in the study of sexual violence. Routledge.
3.
ArtzL.SmytheD. (Eds.). (2008). Should we consent? Rape law reform in South Africa. Juta.
4.
BergenR. K. (1996). Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service providers. Sage.
5.
BohnerG.EysselF.PinaA.SieblerF.VikiG. T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In HorvathM.BrownJ. (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Willan.
6.
BoonzaierF. (2001). Woman abuse: Exploring women’s narratives of violence and resistance in Mitchell’s Plain [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. University of Cape Town.
7.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon & Schuster.
8.
Carmichele v. Minister of Safety and Security2001 (4) SA 938 (CC).
9.
ChennellsR. (2009). Sentencing: The “real rape” myth. Agenda, 23(82), 23–38.
10.
ConaghanJ.RussellY. (2014). Rape myths, law, and feminist research: “Myths about myths”?Feminist Legal Studies, 22(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-014-9259-z
CoverR. (1986). Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal, 95(8), 1601–1629.
13.
Department of Justice. (2007). Criminal law (sentencing) Amendment Bill (B15-2007). Justice and Constitutional Development Portfolio Committee. https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/8177/
14.
DPP v. Thabethe (619/10) [2011] ZASCA 186 (2011, September 30).
15.
EstrichS. (1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.
16.
FedlerJ. (1995). Lawyering domestic violence through the Prevention of Family Violence Act 1993: An evaluation after a year in operation. South African Law Journal, 112(2), 231–251.
17.
FrederickI.DavidsL. (1995). The privacy of wife abuse. Journal of South African Law, 3, 471–492.
18.
GaveyN. (2013). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. Routledge.
19.
GergerH.KleyH.BohnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 422–440.
20.
HamlinJ. (1988). The misplaced role of rational choice in neutralization theory. Criminology, 26(3), 425–438.
21.
Hansard House of Assembly Debates. (1989, February10). Columns, 556–560.
22.
HartmanS. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford University Press.
23.
JacksonS. (1978). The social context of rape: Sexual scripts and motivation. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1(1), 27–38.
24.
JacksonS. (2016). For a feminist sociological imagination: A personal retrospective on C. Wright Mills. In OakesG. (Ed.), The Anthem companion to C. Wright Mills (pp. 159–178). Anthem Press.
25.
JewkesR.AbrahamsN. (2002). The epidemiology of rape and sexual coercion in South Africa: An overview. Social Science & Medicine, 55(7), 1231–1244.
26.
KaganasF.MurrayC. (1991). Law reform and the family: The new South African rape-in-marriage legislation. Journal of Law and Society, 18(3), 287–302.
27.
KellyL. (2001). Routes to (in)justice: A research review on the reporting, investigation and prosecution of rape cases. Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate.
28.
KirkwoodM.CecilD. (2001). Marital rape: A student assessment of rape laws and the marital exemption. Violence Against Women, 7(11), 1234–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122183847
29.
KottlerS. (1998). Wives’ subjective definitions of and attitudes towards wife rape [Master’s thesis]. University of South Africa.
30.
KubistaN. (2005). Substantial and compelling circumstances: Sentencing of rapists under the mandatory minimum sentencing scheme. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(1), 77–86.
31.
LazarR. L. (2015). The vindictive wife: The credibility of complainants in cases of wife rape. Southern California Review of Law & Social Justice, 25, 1–38.
32.
LonswayK.FitzgeraldL. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164.
33.
LonswayK.FitzgeraldL. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711.
34.
MachisaM.JewkesR.MornaC.RamaK. (2011). The war at home: Gender based violence indicators project. Gender Links and the South African Medical Research Council.
35.
MachisaM.JinaR.LabuschagneG.VettenL.SwemmerS.MeyersfeldB.JewkesR. (2017). Rape justice in South Africa: A retrospective study of the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of reported rape cases from 2012. Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council.
36.
MengoC.OkumuM.OmbayoB.NaharS.SmallE. (2019). Marital rape and HIV risk in Uganda: The impact of women’s empowerment factors. Violence Against Women, 25, 1783–1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218821444
37.
MeyerS.VivianD.O’LearyD. (1998). Men’s sexual aggression in marriage: Couples’ reports. Violence Against Women, 4(4), 415–435.
38.
MillsC. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913.
39.
MiltonJ. R. L. (1989). Law reform: Marital rape. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 2(1), 79–82.
40.
ModiriJ. (2014). The rhetoric of rape: An extended note on apologism, depoliticisation and the male gaze in Ndou v. S. South African Journal on Human Rights, 30(1), 134–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2014.11865101
41.
Ntholeng v. S [2004] JOL 13024 (O).
42.
PadayacheeA.ManjooR. (1996). Domestic violence support services will fail without agency networking. Agenda, 12(30), 73–78.
43.
PayneD.LonswayK.FitzgeraldL. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68.
44.
RandallM. (2008). Sexual assault in spousal relationships, continuous consent, the law: Honest but mistaken judicial beliefs. Manitoba Law Journal, 33(2), 144–181.
45.
Rowles v. S [2012] JOL 29414 (ECG).
46.
SchwendingerJ.SchwendingerH. (1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1, 18–26.
47.
ScottM.LymanS. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
48.
ScullyD.MarollaJ. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31(5), 530–544.
49.
Sekese v. S [2009] JOL 23803 (ECM).
50.
Sloth-NielsenJ.EhlersL. (2006). Assessing the impact: Mandatory and minimum sentences in South Africa. South African Crime Quarterly, 14, 15–22.
51.
SmytheD. (2015). Rape unresolved: Policing sexual offences in South Africa. University of Cape Town Press.
52.
State v. Matyityi (695/09) [2010] ZASCA 127 (30 September 2010).
53.
Stephen Bryan De Beer v. The State (121/04) (Delivered on 12 November 2004) (Unreported Judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
54.
S v. Abrahams2002 (1) SACR 116 (SCA), [2002] JOL 9263(A).
55.
S v. Baloyi2000 (1) BCLR 86 (CC).
56.
S v. Chapman1997 (3) SA 341 (SCA).
57.
S v. Modise (113/06) [2007].
58.
S v. Moipolai (CA 53/2004) [2004].
59.
S v. Mvamvu [2005] 1 All SA 435 (SCA).
60.
S v. N [1988] 1 All SA 363 (A) 377(2).
61.
S v. Ntuli [2005] JOL 12442 (ECLD).
62.
SykesG.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
63.
Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre, Rape Crisis Cape Town Trust, the Women’s Legal Centre, People Opposing Women Abuse, OUT LGBT Well-Being, Resources Aimed at the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, and the Centre for Applied Legal Studies (2007, June15). Submission to the parliamentary portfolio committee on justice and constitutional development: The criminal law (sentencing) Amendment Bill. http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/docs/2007/070731tlac.htm
64.
Van Eeden v. Minister of Safety and Security2003 (1) SA 389 (SCA).
65.
VettenL. (2013). Deserving and undeserving women: A case study of South African policy and legislation addressing domestic violence [Master’s thesis]. University of the Witwatersrand.
