Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many people believe that rape is always perpetrated by a stranger and involves vaginal intercourse. To clarify perceptions of rape that do not follow traditional beliefs, participants were presented with a vignette that described a rape in which the marital status and sexual act were manipulated. Participants were then asked to assess the incident’s severity and the victim’s responsibility. Results indicated that there was no difference in perceptions between vignettes based on marital status. However, rapes involving vaginal intercourse were associated with lesser degrees of victim blame and minimization than were rapes involving forced oral sex or digital sex.

Keywords

rape marital rape sexual assault forced oral sex

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Viki

Masser

Bohner

(2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111

Anderson

(2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 225-245. doi:10.1348/014466606X101780

Basile

(2002). Attitudes toward wife rape: Effects of social background and victim status. Violence and Victims, 17, 341-354. doi:10.1891/vivi.17.3.341.33659

Ben-David

Schneider

(2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim-perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles, 53, 385-399. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-6761-4

Black

K. A.

Gold

D. J.

(2008). Gender differences and socioeconomic status biases in judgments about blame in date rape scenarios. Violence and Victims, 23, 115-128. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.115

Brownmiller

(1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217

Byers

E. S.

Henderson

Hobson

K. M.

(2009). University students’ definitions of sexual abstinence and having sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 665-674. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9289-6

Crowne

D. P.

Marlowe

(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354. doi:10.1037/h0047358

10.

Du Mont

Miller

Myhr

(2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466-486. doi:10.1177/1077801202250960

11.

Durán

Moya

Megías

J. L.

Viki

(2010). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: The role of perpetrator’s benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 505-519. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9676-7

12.

Edwards

K. M.

Turchik

J. A.

Dardis

C. M.

Reynolds

Gidycz

C. A.

(2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761-773. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2

13.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Frequently asked questions about the change in the UCR definition of rape. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/recent-program-updates/new-rape-definition-frequently-asked-questions

14.

Ferro

Cermele

Saltzman

(2008). Current perceptions of marital rape: Some good and not-so-good news. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 764-779. doi:10.1177/0886260507313947

15.

Franiuk

Shain

E. A.

(2011). Beyond Christianity: The status of women and rape myths. Sex Roles, 65, 783-791. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9974-8

16.

Frese

Moya

Megías

J. L.

(2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143-161. doi:10.1177/0886260503260245

17.

Grubb

Harrower

(2009). Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 63-81. doi:10.1080/13552600802641649

18.

Hans

Gillen

Akande

(2010). Sex redefined: The reclassification of oral-genital contact. Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health, 42, 74-78. doi:10.1363/4207410

19.

Hayes

R. M.

Abbott

R. L.

Cook

(2016). It’s her fault: Student acceptance of rape myths on two college campuses. Violence Against Women, 22, 1540-1555. doi:10.1177/1077801216630147

20.

Hayes

R. M.

Lorenz

Bell

K. A.

(2013). Victim blaming others: Rape myth acceptance and the just world belief. Feminist Criminology, 8, 202-220. doi:10.1177/1557085113484788

21.

Hockett

J. M.

Smith

S. J.

Klausing

C. D.

Saucier

D. A.

(2016). Rape myth consistency and gender differences in perceiving rape victims: A meta-analysis. Violence Against Women, 22, 139-167. doi:10.1177/1077801215607359

22.

Kahn

A. S.

Jackson

Kully

Badger

Halvorsen

(2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 233-242. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00103

23.

Kalra

Bhugra

(2013). Sexual violence against women: Understanding cross-cultural intersections. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55, 244-249. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.117139

24.

Kassing

Prieto

(2003). The rape myth and blame-based beliefs of counselors-in-training toward male victims of rape. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 455-462. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00272.x

25.

Kirkwood

M. K.

Cecil

D. K.

(2001). Marital rape: A student assessment of rape laws and the marital rape exemption. Violence Against Women, 7, 1234-1253. doi:10.1177/1077801201007011003

26.

Krug

E. G.

Mercy

J. A.

Dahlberg

L. L.

Zwi

A. B.

Lozano

(Eds.). (2002). The world report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

27.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Monson

C. M.

(1998). Marital rape: Is the crime taken seriously without co-occurring physical abuse? Journal of Family Violence, 13, 433-443. doi:10.1023/A:1022831421093

28.

Martin

E. K.

Taft

C. T.

Resick

P. A.

(2007). A review of marital rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 329-347. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.003

29.

McPhillips

Braun

Gavey

(2001). Defining (hetero)sex: How imperative is the “coital imperative?” Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 229-240. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(01)00160-1

30.

Monson

C. M.

Byrd

G. R.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

J. J.

(1996). To have and to hold: Perceptions of marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 410-424. doi:10.1177/0886260960110030

31.

Monson

C. M.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Binderup

(2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes?” Attributions about date and marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1156-1174. doi:10.1177/088626000015011003

32.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Kimes

L. A.

(1999). The social construction of violence: The case of sexual and domestic violence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 234-245. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_6

33.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Powch

I. G.

Phelps

J. L.

Giusti

L. M.

(1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 23-44. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01155.x

34.

Munge

B. A.

Pomerantz

A. M.

Pettibone

J. C.

Falconer

J. W.

(2007). The influence of length of marriage and fidelity status on perception of marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1332-1339. doi:10.1177/0886260507304553

35.

Paolacci

Chandler

(2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184-188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598

36.

Paolacci

Chandler

Ipeirotis

P. G.

(2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.

37.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

38.

Peterson

Z. D.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

(2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129-144. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00

39.

Peterson

Z. D.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

(2007). What is sex, and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals’ definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 256-268. doi:10.1080/00224490701443932

40.

Redden

(2016, April 23). Oklahoma court: Oral sex is not rape if victim is unconscious from drinking. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/27/oral-sex-rape-ruling-tulsa-oklahoma-alcohol-consent

41.

Ristock

J. L.

(2001). Decentering heterosexuality: Responses of feminist service counselors to abuse in lesbian relationships. Women & Therapy, 23, 59-72. doi:10.1300/J015v23n03_05

42.

Sanders

Hill

Yarber

Graham

Crosby

Milhausen

(2010). Misclassification bias: Diversity in conceptualizations about having had sex. Sexual Health, 7, 31-34. doi:10.1071/SH09068

43.

Sanders

Reinisch

(1999). Would you say you “had sex” if . . . ? Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 275-277. doi:10.1001/jama.281.3.275

44.

Shapiro

D. N.

Chandler

Mueller

P. A.

(2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 213-220. doi:10.1177/2167702612469015

45.

Shorey

R. C.

Cornelius

T. L.

Bell

K. M.

(2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: Comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 185-194.

46.

Simonson

Subich

(1999). Rape perceptions as a function of gender-role traditionality and victim-perpetrator association. Sex Roles, 40, 617-634. doi:10.1023/A:1018844231555

47.

Štulhofer

Ajduković

(2013). A mixed-methods exploration of women’s experiences of anal intercourse: Meanings related to pain and pleasure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1053-1062. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0068-7

48.

Tetreault

P. A.

Barnett

M. A.

(1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 353-358. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00909.x

49.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of the Violence Against Women Survey: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

50.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

51.

Truman

J. L.

(2011). Criminal victimization, 2010. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

52.

Truman

J. L.

Langton

(2015). Criminal victimization, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

53.

Truman

J. L.

Rand

M. R.

(2010). Criminal victimization, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

54.

Vonderhaar

R. L.

Carmody

D. C.

(2015). There are no “innocent victims”: The influence of just world beliefs and prior victimization on rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1615-1632. doi:10.1177/0886260514549196

55.

Whatley

M. A.

(2005). The effect of participant sex, victim dress, and traditional attitudes on causal judgments for marital rape victims. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 191-200. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-3655-8

What Constitutes Rape? The Effect of Marital Status and Type of Sexual Act on Perceptions of Rape Scenarios

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References