We respond to three commentaries on our essay, “Trouble in Paradigm: ‘Gender Transformative’ Programming in Violence Prevention,” published in this symposium. Dworkin and Barker prompt us to clarify our presentation of “social norms” mechanisms that undergird paradigmatic public health violence prevention programs. Orchowski leads us to elaborate on the problems we perceive in an information-based descriptive norms approach that disregards the gendered organization of both violence perpetration and normative interactions. Finally, Hollander and Pascoe inspire us to think further about strengthening prevention programs to integrate “intersectional accountability” and be “truly gender-transformative.”
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 61-79.
2.
BasileK. C.DeGueS.JonesK.FreireK.DillsJ.SmithS. G.RaifordJ. L. (2016). STOP SV: A technical package to prevent sexual violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
3.
David-FerdonC.Vivolo-KantorA. M.DahlbergL. L.MarshallK. J.RainfordN.HallJ. E. (2016). A comprehensive technical package for the prevention of youth violence and associated risk behaviors. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
4.
DworkinS. L.BarkerG. (2019). Gender-Transformative Approaches to Engaging Men in Reducing Gender-Based Violence: A Response to Brush & Miller’s “Trouble in Paradigm”. Violence Against Women, 25, 1657-1671.
5.
FabianoP. M.PerkinsH. W.BerkowitzA.LinkenbachJ.StarkC. (2003). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52, 105-112.
6.
HollanderJ. A.PascoeC. J. (2019). Comment on Brush and Miller’s “Trouble in Paradigm: ‘Gender Transformative’ Programming in Violence Prevention”. Violence Against Women, 25, 1682-1688.
7.
JewkesR.DunkleK.MorrellR.SikweyiyaY. (2011). Gender inequitable masculinity and sexual entitlement in rape perpetration South Africa: Findings of a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 6, e29590.
8.
JewkesR.FloodM.LangJ. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. Violence against women and girls Series no. 3. Lancet, 385, 1580-1589.
9.
NiolonP. H.KearnsM.DillsJ.RamboK.IrvingS.ArmsteadT.GilbertL. (2017). Preventing intimate partner violence across the lifespan: A technical package of programs, policies, and practices. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
10.
OrchowskiL. (2019). “Trouble in Paradigm” and the social norms approach to violence prevention. Violence Against Women, 25, 1672-1681.
11.
PerkinsH. W. (Ed.). (2003). The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
PulerwitzJ.BarkerG. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM scale. Men and Masculinities, 10, 322-338.
13.
VuL.PulerwitzJ.Burnett-ZiemanB.BanuraC.OkalJ.YamE. (2017). Inequitable gender norms from early adolescence to young adulthood in Uganda: Tool validation and differences across age groups. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, S15-S21.
