Past research applying Donald Black’s theory of the behavior of law to sexual assault case processing has focused on victim decisions to report the crime to the police. This study builds on and extends prior research by examining the next stage of legal mobilization (i.e., arrest). Using secondary data on 310 cases from the 1982-2012 Sexual Assault Kit Backlog Study in Los Angeles, California, the current study explores the effects of victim, offender, and case characteristics on arrest. The results suggest limited support for the theory in this victimization context. Implications for theory, research, and criminal justice practice are discussed.
AhrensC. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263-274.
2.
AlderdenM.UllmanS. (2012). Creating a more complete and current picture: Examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 18, 525-551.
3.
AmblerG.OmarR.RoystonP. (2007). A comparison of imputation techniques for handling missing predictor values in a risk model with a binary outcome. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 277-298.
4.
AvakameE.FyfeJ.McCoyC. (1999). “Did you call the police? What did they do?” An empirical assessment of Black’s theory of mobilization of law. Justice Quarterly, 16, 765-792.
5.
BachmanR. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 8-29.
6.
BaumerE. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 576-617.
7.
BaumerE. P.FelsonR. B.MessnerS. F. (2003). Changes in police notification for rape, 1973-2000. Criminology, 41, 841-872.
8.
BaumerE. P.LauritsenJ. L. (2010). Reporting crime to the police, 1973-2005: A multivariate analysis of long-term trends in the National Crime Survey (NCS) and National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology, 48, 131-185.
9.
BelsleyD.KuhE.WelschR. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley.
10.
BlackD. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.
11.
BlackD. (2007). Legal relativity. In ClarkD. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of law and society: American and global perspectives (pp. 1292-1294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
BouffardJ. (2000). Predicting type of sexual assault case closure from victim, suspect, and case characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 527-542.
13.
Brooks-HayO. (2020). Doing the “right thing”? Understanding why rape victim survivors report to the police. Feminist Criminology, 15, 174-195. doi: 10.1177/1557085119859079
14.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). National Crime Victimization Survey, 2010-2014. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
CampbellR.Fehler-CabralG. (2018). Why police “couldn’t or wouldn’t” submit sexual assault kits for forensic DNA testing: A focal concerns theory analysis of untested rape kits. Law & Society Review, 52, 73-105.
16.
CampbellR.PierceS.SharmaD.FeeneyH.Fehler-CabralG. (2016). Should rape kit testing be prioritized by victim-offender relationships?Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 555-583.
17.
ChappellA. T. (2018). Predicting the behavior of law in the juvenile court: A focus on noncompliance cases. Crime & Delinquency, 65, 1027-1049. doi:10.1177/0011128718787156
18.
Clay-WarnerJ.McMahon-HowardJ. (2009). Rape reporting: “Classic rape” and the behavior of law. Violence & Victims, 24, 833-858.
19.
CooneyM. (1994). Evidence as partisanship. Law & Society Review, 28, 833-858.
20.
CopesH.KerleyK.MasonK.Van WykJ. (2001). Reporting behavior of fraud victims and Black’s theory of law: An empirical assessment. Justice Quarterly, 18, 343-363.
21.
CurryT. R. (2014). The benefits and penalties of gender for criminal justice processing outcomes among adults and juveniles. In GartherR.McCarthyB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender, sex, and crime (pp. 551-571). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
DuganL.ApelR. (2003). An exploratory study of the violent victimization of women: Race/ethnicity and situational context. Criminology, 41, 959-980.
23.
EstrichS. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
FelsonR. B.MessnerS. F.HoskinA. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the police in assaults. Criminology, 37, 931-948.
25.
FelsonR. B.PareP. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage & Family, 67, 597-610.
26.
FoxJ. (1991). Regression diagnostics: An introduction. London, England: Sage.
27.
FrohmannL. (1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213-226.
28.
GagnonK. L.WrightN.SrinivasT.DePrinceA. P. (2018). Survivors’ advice to service providers: How to best serve survivors of sexual assault. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 27, 1125-1144.
29.
GolladayK. A. (2017). Reporting behaviors of identity theft victims: An empirical test of Black’s theory of law. Journal of Financial Crime, 24, 101-117.
30.
GottfredsonM.HindelangM. (1979). A study of the behavior of law. American Sociological Review, 44, 3-18.
31.
GrahamJ. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
32.
GrahamJ.SchaferJ. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In HoyleR. (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
HartleyR. D.MaddenS.SpohnC. (2007). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—A research note. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 58-78.
34.
HoltfreterK. (2008). The effects of legal and extra-legal characteristics on organizational victim decision-making. Crime, Law and Social Change, 50, 307-330.
35.
IshoyD. A.DabneyD. A. (2018). Policing and the focal concerns framework: Exploring how its core components apply to the discretionary enforcement decisions of police officers. Deviant Behavior, 39, 878-895.
36.
JacquesS.RennisonC. M. (2013). Social distance and immediate informal responses to violent victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 735-754.
37.
KaiserK.O’NealE.SpohnC. (2016). “Victim refuses to cooperate”: A focal concerns analysis of victim cooperation in sexual assault cases. Victims & Offenders, 12, 297-322.
38.
KelleyK.CampbellR. (2013). Moving on or dropping out: Police processing of adult sexual assault cases. Women & Criminal Justice, 23, 1-18.
39.
KerstetterW. A.Van WinkleB. (1990). Who decides? A study of the complainant’s decision to prosecute in rape cases. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 17, 268-283.
40.
LaFreeG. D. (1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. American Sociological Review, 45, 842-854.
41.
MastrofskiS.ReisigM. D.McCluskyJ. (2002). Police disrespect toward the public: An encounter-based analysis. Criminology, 40, 519-552.
42.
McKinleyJ. (2018, June5). Harvey Weinstein pleads not guilty to sexual assault charges. New York Times, p. A18.
43.
MorabitoM. S.PattavinaA.WilliamsL. M. (2019). It all just piles up: Challenges to victim credibility accumulate to influence sexual assault case processing. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 3151-3170.
44.
National Research Council. (2014). Estimating the incidence of rape and sexual assault: Panel on measuring rape and sexual assault in Bureau of Justice Statistics household surveys. Washington, DC: Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academies Press.
45.
O’NealE.SpohnC. (2017). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women, 23, 707-729.
46.
PattavinaA.MorabitoM. S.WilliamsL. (2016). Examining connections between the police and prosecution in sexual assault case processing: Does the use of exceptional clearance facilitate a downstream orientation?Victims & Offenders, 11, 315-334.
47.
PetersonJ.HerzD.JohnsonD.GrazianoL.OehlerT. (2012). Sexual assault kit backlog study, Los Angeles, California, 1982-2010 (Final Report. ICPSR-V.338411). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
48.
PhillipsS. (2009). Status disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Law & Society Review, 43, 807-837.
49.
PlantyM.LangtonL.KrebsC.BerzofskyM.Smiley-McDonaldH. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
50.
Romero-SanchezM.KraheB.MoyaM.MegiasJ. L. (2018). Alcohol-related victim behavior and rape myth acceptance as predictors of victim blame in sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 24, 1052-1069.
51.
SchuckA. M. (2018). Women in policing and the response to rape: Representative bureaucracy and organizational change. Feminist Criminology, 13, 237-259.
52.
SmithO.SkinnerT. (2012). Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault. Feminist Criminology, 7, 298-326.
53.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651-688.
54.
SpohnC.HorneyJ. (1993). Rape law reform and the effect of victim characteristics on case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 383-405.
55.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 169-192.
56.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2014). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault: Inside the criminal justice system. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
57.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2018). Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly, 36, 383-411.
58.
SpohnC.WhiteC.TellisK. (2014). Unfounding sexual assault: Examining the decision to unfound and identify false reports. Law & Society Review, 48, 161-192.
59.
StackL. (2016, June6). Light sentence for Brock Turner in Stanford rape case draws outrage. New York Times, p. A15.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 764-798.
62.
TascaM.RodriguezN.SpohnC.KossM. (2013). Police decision making in sexual assault cases: Predictors of suspect identification and arrest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1157-1177.
63.
TaylorS. C.NormaC. (2011). The “symbolic protest” behind women’s reporting of sexual assault to the police. Feminist Criminology, 7, 24-47.
64.
TellisK. M.SpohnC. (2008). The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 252-261.
UllmanS.LorenzK.KirknerA. (2017). Alcohol’s role in social reactions to sexual assault disclosures: A qualitative study of informal support dyads. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260517721172
67.
WilliamsL. (1984). The classic rape: When do victims report?Social Problems, 31, 459-467.
68.
XieM.LauritsenJ. (2012). Racial context and crime reporting: A test of Black’s stratification hypothesis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 265-293.
