Sexual assault and case attrition at the arrest stage are serious problems in the United States. Focal concerns have increasingly been used to explain police decision making in sexual assault cases. Because of the popularity of the focal concerns perspective and potential to inform evidence-based training, a systematic review and meta-analysis are needed to condense the literature. In this study, we assess the overall strength of the relationship between focal concerns variables and police decisions to arrest in cases of sexual assault. Our assessment of the effects of focal concerns variables on arrest decision making in sexual assault cases followed the systematic review protocols provided by the Campbell Collaboration of Systematic Reviews. Specifically, we used the Campbell Collaboration recommendations to search empirical literature and used meta-analysis to evaluate the size, direction, and strength of the impact of focal concerns variables on arrest decisions. Our search strategy detected 14 eligible studies and 79 effect sizes. The meta-analysis found several robust and statistically significant correlates of arrest. In fact, each focal concerns concept produced at least one robust arrest correlate. Overall, focal concerns offers a strong approach for explaining police decisions in sexual assault cases. Although practical concerns and resource constraints produced the strongest arrest correlates, results show the importance of additional case characteristics in officers’ decision to arrest.
AddingtonL. A.RennisonC. M. (2008). Rape co-occurrence: Do additional crimes affect victim reporting and police clearance of rape?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(2), 205–226.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processings. Criminology, 24(4), 623–644.
3.
AlbonettiC. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291–314.
4.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.
5.
AlderdenM. A. (2008). Processing of sexual assault cases through the criminal justice system. University of Illinois at Chicago.
6.
AlderdenM. A.UllmanS. E. (2012a). Creating a more complete and current picture: Examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 18(5), 525–551.
7.
AlderdenM. A.UllmanS. E. (2012b). Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(1), 3–22.
8.
BeichnerD.SpohnC. (2012). Modeling the effects of victim behavior and moral character on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Violence & Victims, 27, 3–24.
9.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BouffardJ. A. (2000). Predicting type of sexual assault case closure from victim, suspect, and case characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 527–542.
11.
CampbellB. A. (2015). Predictors of police decision making in sexual assault investigations. Sam Houston State University.
12.
CampbellB. A.LapseyD. S.WellsW. (2019). An evaluation of Kentucky’s sexual assault investigation training: Results from a randomized three-group experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–23. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09391-0
13.
CampbellB. A.MenakerT. A.KingW. R. (2015). The determination of victim credibility by adult and juvenile sexual assault investigators. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 29–39.
14.
CampbellR. (2012, December). The neurobiology of sexual assault: Implications for first responders in law enforcement, prosecution, and victim advocacy. In NIJ Research for the Real World Seminar. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx
15.
CampbellR.BybeeD.TownsendS. M.ShawJ.KarimN.MarkowitzJ. (2014). The impact of sexual assault nurse examiner programs on criminal justice case outcomes: A multi-site study. Violence Against Women, 20, 607–625.
16.
CampbellR.Fehler-CabralG.PierceS. J.SharmaD.BybeeD.ShawJ.HorsfordS.FeeneyH. (2015). The Detroit sexual assault kit (SAK) action research project (ARP) (NIJ 2011-DN-BX-0001). National Institute of Justice.
17.
CardN. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. Guilford Press.
18.
CrowM. S.AdrionB. (2011). Focal concerns and police use of force: Examining the factors associated with TASER use. Police Quarterly, 14, 366–387.
19.
CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Vol. Eds.). (2006). Taking stock: The status of criminological theory, advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15). Transaction.
20.
DarwinkelE.PowellM.TidmarshP. (2013). Improving police officers’ perceptions of sexual offending through intensive training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(8), 895–908.
21.
EstrichS. (1987). Realrape: How the system victimizes women who say no. Harvard University Press.
22.
FieldH. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: a comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, andcitizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2), 156–17.
23.
FittonL.YuR.FazelS. (2020). Childhood maltreatment and violent outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(4), 754–768.
24.
FleissJ. L.BerlinJ. A. (2009). Measures of effect size for dichotomous data. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 237–253). Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
FranklinC. A.GarzaA. D.GoodsonA.BouffardL. A. (2019). Police perceptions of crime victim behaviors: A trend analysis exploring mandatory training and knowledge of sexual and domestic violence survivors’ trauma responses. Crime & Delinquency, 66, 1055–1086.
26.
HaidichA. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14, 1–29.
27.
HartleyR. D.MaddanS.SpohnC. (2007). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—A research note. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 58–78.
28.
HasselbladV.HedgesL.V. (1995). Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychology Bulletin, 117, 167–178.
29.
HedgesL.OlkinI. (1980). Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 359–369.
30.
HedgesL.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
31.
HigginsG. E.VitoG. F.GrossiE. L. (2012). The impact of race on the police decision to search during a traffic stop: A focal concerns theory perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28, 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211425725
32.
HigginsonA.BenierK.ShenderovichY.BedfordL.MazerolleL.MurrayJ. (2018). Factors associated with youth gang membership in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–128.
33.
HorneyJ.SpohnC. (1996). The influence of blame and believability factors on the processing of simple versus aggravated rape cases. Criminology, 34(2), 135–162.
34.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (Eds.). (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
35.
JohnsonR. R.KlahmC. F.MaddoxH. G. (2015). An exploratory analysis of time lapses in serving arrest warrants: A focal concerns and disproportional contact approach. Criminal Justice Review, 40, 470–487.
36.
KaiserK. A.O’NealE. N.SpohnC. (2017). “Victim refuses to cooperate”: A focal concerns analysis of victim cooperation in sexual assault cases. Victims & Offenders, 12(2), 297–322.
37.
KelleyK. D. (2008). Police handling of sexual assault cases: The first formal decision. Michigan State University.
38.
KelleyK. D.CampbellR. (2013). Moving on or dropping out: Police processing of adult sexual assault cases. Women & Criminal Justice, 23(1), 1–18.
39.
KerstetterW. A. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 81, 267.
40.
KochelT. R.WilsonD. B.MastrofskiS. D. (2011). Effects of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology, 49(2), 473–512.
41.
LaFreeG. D. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28(5), 582–5.
42.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
43.
LonswayK. A.WelchS.FitzgeraldL. F. (2001). Police training in sexual assault response: Process, outcomes, and elements of change. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(6), 695–730.
44.
LovellR.HuangW.OvermanL.FlanneryD.KlingensteinJ. (2020). Offending histories and typologies of suspected sexual offenders identified via untested sexual assault kits. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 470–486.
45.
LovellR.LuminaisM.FlanneryD. J.OvermanL.HuangD.WalkerT.ClarkD. R. (2017). Offending patterns for serial sex offenders identified via the DNA testing of previously unsubmitted sexual assault kits. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 68–78.
46.
MeekerK. A.O’NealE. N.HayesB. E. (2019). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault: An examination of arrest and initial filing decisions in cases involving adolescent complainants. Justice Quarterly, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1679863
47.
MorabitoM. S.PattavinaA.WilliamsL. M. (2019). It all just piles up: Challenges to victim credibility accumulate to influence sexual assault case processing. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(15), 3151–3170.
48.
MorabitoM. S.WilliamsL. M.PattavinaA. (2019). Decision making in sexual assault cases: Replication research on sexual violence case attrition in the US. University of Massachusetts Lowell, School of Criminology & Justice Studies.
49.
MurphyA.HineB. (2019). Investigating the demographic and attitudinal predictors of rape myth acceptance in UK police officers: Developing an evidence-base for training and professional development. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(1), 69–89.
50.
O’NealE. N.BeckmanL. O.SpohnC. (2019). The sexual stratification hypothesis: Is the decision to arrest influenced by the victim/suspect racial/ethnic dyad?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(6), 1287–1310.
51.
O’NealE. N.SpohnC. (2017). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women, 23(6), 707–729.
52.
OrwinR. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 157–159.
53.
PattavinaA.MorabitoM.WilliamsL. M. (2015). Examining connections between the police and prosecution in sexual assault case processing: Does the use of exceptional clearance facilitate a downstream orientation?Victims & Offenders, 11(2), 315–334.
54.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.
55.
RichK.SeffrinP. (2012). Police interviews of sexual assault reporters: Do attitudes matter?Violence and Victims, 27(2), 263–279.
56.
RichardsT. N.TillyerM. S.WrightE. M. (2019). When victims refuse and prosecutors decline: Examining exceptional clearance in sexual assault cases. Crime & Delinquency, 65(4), 474–498.
57.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
58.
RosenthalR.DiMattateoM. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82.
59.
ScottH. S.BeamanR. (2004). Demographic and situational factors affecting injury, resistance, completion, and charges brought in sexual assault cases: What is best for arrest?Violence and Victims, 19(4), 479–494.
60.
ShadishW.HaddockK. (2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In CooperH. M.HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd Ed., pp. 257–278). SAGE Foundation.
61.
SmithJ. D. A. (2005). The investigation of rape complaints: Variables that best predict arrest [Doctoral dissertation]. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland.
62.
SpencerC. M.StithS. M. (2020). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 527–540.
63.
SpohnC.BeichnerD.Davis-FrenzelE. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice.”Social Problems, 48(2), 206–235.
64.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2014). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault: Inside the criminal justice system. Lynne Rienner.
65.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2019). Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly, 36(3), 383–411.
66.
SpohnC.WhiteC.TellisK. (2014). Unfounding sexual assault: Examining the decision to unfound and identifying false reports. Law & Society Review, 48(1), 161–192.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.
69.
SullivanG. M.FeinnR. (2012). Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.
70.
TascaM.RodriguezN.SpohnC.KossM. P. (2013). Police decision making in sexual assault cases: Predictors of suspect identification and arrest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(6), 1157–1177.
71.
TidmarshP.HamiltonG.SharmanS. J. (2020). Changing police officers’ attitudes in sexual offense cases: A 12-month follow-up study. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 1–14. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820921201
72.
TillyerR. D.HartleyR. D. (2010). Driving racial profiling research forward: Learning lessons from sentencing research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 657–665.
73.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C. (2020). Meta-analysis in criminology and criminal justice: Challenging the paradigm and charting a new path forward. Justice Evaluation Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2020.1775107
74.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multi-level analysis. Criminology, 42, 137–177.
75.
VenemaR. M.LorenzK.SwedaN. (2019). Unfounded, cleared, or cleared by exceptional means: Sexual assault case outcomes from 1999 to 2014. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519876718
76.
WalfieldS. M. (2016). When a cleared rape is not cleared: A multilevel study of arrest and exceptional clearance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(9), 1767–1792.
77.
WentzE. A. (2019). Funneled through or filtered out: An examination of police and prosecutorial decision-making in adult sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1077801219890419
78.
WentzE. A.KeimigK. (2019). Arrest and referral decisions in sexual assault cases: The influence of police discretion on case attrition. Social Sciences, 8(6), 180.
79.
WoodD. S.RosayA. B.PostleG.TePasK. (2011). Police presence, isolation, and sexual assault prosecution. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(3), 330–349.
80.
YeatonW.WortmanP. (1993). On the reliability of meta-analytic reviews: The role of intercoder agreement. Evaluation Review, 17, 292–309.
81.
YlangN.HoltfreterK. (2019). The decision to arrest in sexual assault case processing: A test of black’s theory of the behavior of law. Violence Against Women. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1077801219862632
