In the United States, teen dating violence (TDV) is a concern across ethnic groups. Attitudes and correlates of violence differ by gender, culture, and acculturation. This study used a qualitative interpretive approach. Data were obtained in focus groups with 23 Latino male adolescents. Themes reflected contexts of participants’ lives, and definitions and nature of dating relationships and TDV. Participants described the importance of respecting dating partners, the destructive effects of TDV, and the pressure to display masculinity that can lead some young men to perpetrate TDV. These results may advance culturally relevant interventions to promote healthy relationships and prevent dating violence.
ArciniegaG.AndersonT.Tovar-BlankZ.TraceyT. (2008). Toward a fuller conception of machismo: Development of a traditional machismo and caballerismo scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 19-33.
2.
AuerbachC.SilversteinL. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
3.
BanyardV.CrossC. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence: Understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14, 998-1013.
4.
BlackB.WeiszA. (2005). Dating violence: A qualitative analysis of Mexican American youths’ views. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 13, 69-90.
5.
CuevasC.SabinaC.BellK. (2014). Dating violence and interpersonal victimization among a national sample of Latino youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 564-570.
EnriquezM.KellyP.ChengA.HunterJ.MendezE. (2012). An intervention to address interpersonal violence among low-income Midwestern Hispanic-American teens. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 14, 292-299.
9.
Exner-CortensD.EckenrodeJ.BungeJ.RothmanE. (2017). Revictimization after adolescent dating violence in a matched, national sample of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, 176-183.
10.
Exner-CortensD.EckenrodeJ.RothmanE. (2013). Longitudinal associations between teen dating violence victimization and adverse health outcomes. Pediatrics, 131, 71-78.
11.
FredlandN.RicardoI.CampbellJ. C.SharpsP. W.KubJ.YonasM. (2005). The meaning of dating violence in the lives of middle school adolescents: A report of a focus group study. Journal of School Violence, 4, 95-114.
12.
GilR.VasquezC. (1996). The Maria paradox: How Latinas can merge old world traditions with new world self-esteem. New York: Perigee Books.
13.
HaglundK.BelknapR.GarciaJ. (2012). Mexican American female adolescents’ perceptions of relationships and dating violence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44, 215-222.
14.
HalpernC.SpriggsA.MartinS.KupperL. (2009). Patterns of intimate partner violence victimization from adolescence to young adulthood in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 508-516.
15.
HillP.LipsonG.MeleisA. (2003). Caring for women cross-culturally. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
16.
HokodaA.GalvánD.MalcarneV.CastaD.UlloaE. (2007). An exploratory study examining teen dating violence, acculturation and acculturative stress in Mexican-American adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 14(3), 33-49.
17.
HowardD.BeckK.KerrM.ShattuckT. (2005). Psychosocial correlates of dating violence victimization among Latino youth. Adolescence, 40, 319-333.
18.
KernsmithP.TolmanR. (2011). Attitudinal correlates of girls’ use of violence in teen dating relationships. Violence Against Women, 17, 500-516.
19.
MalhotraK.Gonzalez-GuardaR.MitchellE. (2015). A review of teen dating violence prevention research: What about Hispanic youth?Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 16, 444-465.
20.
QuigleyD.JaycoxL.McCaffreyD.MarshallG. (2006). Peer and family influences on adolescent anger expression and the acceptance of cross-gender aggression. Violence and Victims, 21, 597-610.
21.
RobertsT.AuingerP.KleinJ. (2005). Intimate partner abuse and the reproductive health of sexually active female adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 380-385.
22.
RodriguezK.SchwartzJ.LahmanM.GeistM. (2011). Culturally responsive focus groups: Reframing the research experience to focus on participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10, 400-417.
23.
SandelowskiM. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 77-84.
24.
SandersonM.CokerA.RobertsR.TortoleroS.ReiningerB. (2004). Acculturation, ethnic identity, and dating violence among Latino ninth-grade students. Preventive Medicine, 39, 373-383.
25.
SilvermanJ.DeckerM.RajA. (2007). Immigration-based disparities in adolescent girls’ vulnerability to dating violence. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11, 37-43.
26.
SilvermanJ.RajA.ClementsK. (2004). Dating violence and associated sexual risk and pregnancy among adolescent girls in the United States. Pediatrics, 114, e220-e225.
27.
SilvermanJ.RajA.MucciL.HathawayJ. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 572-579.
28.
TharpA.CarterM.FasulaA.Hatfield-TimajchyK.JayneP.LatzmanN.KinseyJ. (2013). Advancing adolescent sexual and reproductive health by promoting healthy relationships. Journal of Women’s Health, 22, 911-914.
29.
UlloaE.JaycoxL.SkinnerS.OrsburnM. (2008). Attitudes about violence and dating among Latino/a boys and girls. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 17, 157-176.
30.
Umaña -TaylorA. (2009). Research with Latino early adolescents: Strengths, challenges, and directions for future research. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 5-15.
VandelloJ.BossonJ. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 101-113.
33.
WolfeD.WekerleC.ScottK.StraatmanA.GrasleyC.Reitzel-JaffeD. (2003). Dating violence prevention with at-risk youth: A controlled outcome evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 279-291.
