We drew on the theory of gender and power and grounded theory methodology to explore how 18 Latina girls conceptualized power and control within their heterosexual dating relationships. Our findings indicate that boys/men used a number of strategies to control girls, including: regulating appearances and behaviors; cheating and threatening to cheat; and physical and sexual violence. Girls used a variety of strategies to resist these attempts to control them, including: lying, flirting, and cheating; reactive violence; breaking up; and maintaining emotional distance. Girls attempted to subvert boys’ attempts to control them; however, these attempts were not always successful given the constraints of gender that adolescent females must negotiate.
ArtzS.BiaisM.NicholsonD. (2000). Developing girls’ custody units. Phase I reports to Justice Canada, Ottawa, ON.
2.
BrumbergJ. J. (1997). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Random House.
3.
BuzawaE.HotalingG. T. (2006). The impact of relationship status, gender and minor status in police response to domestic assaults. Victims and Offenders, 1, 1-38.
4.
FosheeV. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating prevalence, types, and injuries. Health Education Research, 11, 275-286.
GuthrieB. J.FlinchbaughL. J. (2001). Gender-specific substance prevention programming: Going beyond just focusing on girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 354-372.
7.
HickmanL. J.JaycoxL. H.AronoffJ. (2004). Dating violence among adolescents: Prevalence, gender distribution, and prevention program effectiveness. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 123-142.
8.
KellyD. (1993). Last chance high: How girls and boys drop in and out of alternative schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
LopezV.JurikN.Gilliard-MatthewsS. (2009). Gender, sexuality, power and drug acquisition strategies among adolescent girls who use meth. Feminist Criminology, 4, 226-251.
10.
MarinB. V. (2003). HIV prevention in the Hispanic community: Sex, culture, and empowerment. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14, 186-192.
11.
MillerJ.WhiteN. A. (2003). Gender and adolescent relationship violence: A contextual examination. Criminology, 41, 1207-1248.
12.
MillerK. S.ClarkK. K.MooreJ. S. (1997). Sexual initiation with older male partners and subsequent HIV risk behavior among female adolescents. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 212-214.
13.
OrensteinP. (1994). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
14.
PulerwitzJ.GortmakerS. L.DeJongW. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637-660.
15.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38- 64.
16.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
TaylorJ. (1996). Cultural stories: Latina and Portuguese daughters and mothers. In LeadbeaterB.WayN. (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 117-131). New York: New York University Press.
18.
ThorneB. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19.
WicksonF.CarewA. L.RussellA. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38, 1046-1059.
20.
WingoodG. M.DiClementeR. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 539-565
