This article explores how women front-line workers engage with domestic and gender-based violence in the urban informal settlements of Dharavi in Mumbai, India. We conducted in-depth interviews with 13 voluntary front-line workers, along with ethnographic fieldwork in Dharavi, as a part of a pilot study. Our findings contribute to literature on context-specific approaches to understanding gender-based violence and “models” to prevent domestic violence in urban micro-spaces. Furthermore, we also discuss notions of “change” (badlaav) that the front-line workers experience. Finally, this article presents implications for socially engaged ethnographic research, as well as contextual and grounded insights on ways to reduce gender-based and domestic violence.
AdelmanM. (2004). The battering state: Towards a political economy of domestic violence. Journal of Poverty, 8(3), 45-64. doi:10.1300/J134v08n03_03
2.
AdelmanM. (2008). The “culture” of the global anti–gender violence social movement. American Anthropologist, 110, 511-514. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00085_2.x
3.
Ahmed-GhoshH. (2004). Chattels of society: Domestic violence in India. Violence Against Women, 10, 94-118. doi:10.1177/1077801203256019
4.
BelurJ.TilleyN.DaruwallaN.KumarM.TiwariV.OsrinD. (2014). The social construction of “dowry deaths.”Social Science & Medicine, 119, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.044
5.
BergmanC. (Ed.). (2003). Another day in paradise: Front line stories from international aid workers. London, England: Earthscan.
6.
BernalV.GrewalI. (2014a). The NGO form: Feminist struggles, states, and neoliberalism. In BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism (pp. 1-18). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
BernalV.GrewalI. (Eds.). (2014b). Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
BerremanG. D. (1968). Is anthropology alive? Social responsibility in social anthropology. Current Anthropology, 9, 391-396. doi:10.1086/200923
ClisbyS.HoldsworthJ. (2014). Gendering women: Identity and mental wellbeing through the lifecourse. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
11.
CoomaraswamyR. (2005). Human security and gender violence. Economic & Political Weekly, 40(44-45), 4729-4736.
12.
CoomaraswamyR.Perera-RajasinghamN. (Eds.). (2008). Constellations of violence: Feminist interventions in South Asia. New Delhi, India: Women Unlimited.
13.
DasV. (2008). Violence, gender, and subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 283-299. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094430
14.
DattaA. (2012). The illegal city: Space, law and gender in a Delhi squatter settlement. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
15.
DaviesC. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
16.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1981). Social science and social action: The case of wife beating. Journal of Family Issues, 2, 439-470. doi:10.1177/0192513X8100200404
17.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. London, England: Routledge.
18.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E. (1981). Community responses to violence against wives: Charivari, abstract justice and patriarchy. Social Problems, 28, 563-581. doi:10.2307/800231
19.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E. (1983). The context–specific approach. In FinkelhorD.GellesR. J.HotalingG. T.StrausM. A. (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 261-276). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
DuroseC. (2009). Front–line workers and “local knowledge”: Neighbourhood stories in contemporary UK governance. Public Administration, 87, 35-49. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01737.x
21.
FassinD. (2013). A case for critical ethnography: Rethinking the early years of AIDS epidemic in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 99, 119-126. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.034
22.
GalS. (2002). A semiotics of the public/private distinction. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13(1), 77-95. doi:10.1215/10407391-13-1-77
23.
GaleN. K.HeathG.CameronE.RashidS.RedwoodS. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, Article 117. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
24.
GrewalI. (2008). Postcoloniality, globalization, and feminist critique. American Anthropologist, 110, 517-520. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00085_4.x
25.
HochschildA. R. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1983)
26.
International Institute for Population Studies & Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India (Vol. 1). Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Studies.
27.
KlasenS.SchülerD. (2011). Reforming the gender-related development index and the gender empowerment measure: Implementing some specific proposals. Feminist Economics, 17(1), 1-30. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.541860
28.
LevyB. (2008). Women and violence. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
29.
LewisR.DobashR. P.DobashR. E.CavanaghK. (2000). Protection, prevention, rehabilitation or justice? Women’s use of the law to challenge domestic violence. International Review of Victimology, 7, 179-205. doi:10.1177/026975800000700310
30.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.
31.
MadhiwallaN. (2014, January). It concerns everybody: Mobilising communities and caregivers to prevent violence against women and children. Unpublished manuscript. Mumbai, India: Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action.
32.
MahoneyM. R. (1994). Women’s lives, violence and agency. In FinemanM. A.MykitiukR. (Eds.), The public nature of private violence: Women and the discovery of abuse (pp. 59-92). New York: Routledge.
33.
MerryS. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
MerryS. E. (2008). Commentary on reviews of human rights and gender violence. American Anthropologist, 110, 520-522. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00085_5.x
35.
OsterweilM. (2013). Rethinking public anthropology through epistemic politics and theoretical practice. Cultural Anthropology, 28, 598-620. doi:10.1111/cuan.12029
36.
PermanyerI. (2013). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s Gender Inequality Index. Feminist Economics, 19(2), 1-32. doi:10.1080/13545701.2013.769687
37.
PiedalueA. (2015). Understanding violence in place: Travelling knowledge paradigms and measuring domestic violence in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 22, 63-91. doi:10.1177/0971521514556947
38.
PottierJ. (1993). Introduction: Development in practice. In PottierJ. (Ed.), Practising development: Social science perspectives (pp. 1-12). London, England: Routledge.
39.
PriceJ. M. (2012). Structural violence: Hidden brutality in the lives of women. New York: State University of New York Press.
40.
RegeS. (1995). Caste and gender: Violence against women in India. In JogdandP. G. (Ed.), Dalit women in India: Issues and perspectives (pp. 18-36). New Delhi, India: Gyan Publications.
41.
RichterR. (2011). Disparity in disasters: A frontline view of gender-based inequities in emergency aid and health care. In WiesJ. R.HaldaneH. R. (Eds.), Anthropology at the front-lines of gender-based violence (pp. 19-28). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
42.
RomitoP. (2008). A deafening silence: Hidden violence against women and children (EastwoodJ., Trans.). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
43.
RoyS. (2009). Melancholic politics and the politics of melancholia: The Indian women’s movement. Feminist Theory, 10, 341-357. doi:10.1177/1464700109343257
44.
RoyS. (2011). Politics, passion and professionalization in contemporary Indian feminism. Sociology, 45, 587-602. doi:10.1177/0038038511406584
RuwanpuraK. N. (2008). The gender and spatial politics of NGOs: Spaces of subversion, sites of reinforcement. In CoomaraswamyR.Perera-RajasinghamN. (Eds.), Constellations of violence: Feminist interventions in South Asia (pp. 93-120). New Delhi, India: Women Unlimited.
47.
SangariK. (2008). Gendered violence, national boundaries and culture. In CoomaraswamyR.Perera-RajasinghamN. (Eds.), Constellations of violence: Feminist interventions in South Asia (pp. 1-33). New Delhi, India: Women Unlimited.
48.
SokoloffN.DupontI. J. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38-64. doi:10.1177/1077801204271476
49.
StanleyL.WiseS. (2013). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research. In StanleyL. (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 20-60). Oxon, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1990)
50.
WiesJ. R. (2008). Professionalizing human services: A case of domestic violence shelter advocates. Human Organization, 67, 221-233. doi:10.17730/humo.67.2.l43m2v54221711l3
51.
WiesJ. R.HaldaneH. H. (Eds.). (2011a). Anthropology at the front lines of gender-based violence. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
52.
WiesJ. R.HaldaneH. H. (2011b). Ethnographic notes from the front lines of gender-based violence. In WiesJ. R.HaldaneH. H. (Eds.), Anthropology at the front lines of gender-based violence (pp. 1-17). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
53.
World Health Organization. (2006). The world health report 2006: Working together for health. Author. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/
