Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Measure of Psychologically Abusive Behaviors Among Young Women and Women in Distressed Relationships

Abstract

The Measure of Psychologically Abusive Behaviors (MPAB) was developed recently to improve on prior scales. Two nationally solicited samples of women were utilized to further validate the MPAB through the use of a criterion group, factor analysis, and designation of a threshold for accurate classification. MPAB scores were twice as high in the criterion group (M = 38.75 vs. M = 18.85; F = 22.17). Using a cutpoint of 1, the sensitivity and specificity for MPAB were .725 and .628, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha was .97 for both samples. These data provide additional evidence for the MPAB as valid and internally consistent.

Keywords

IPV in women measurement psychological abuse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachman

Saltzman

(1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Dutton

D. G.

(1994). Behavioral and affective correlates of borderline personality organization in wife assaulters. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17, 265-277. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(94)90030-2

Follingstad

D. R.

(2007). Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: Conceptual and methodological issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 439-458. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.004

Follingstad

D. R.

(2011). A measure of severe psychological abuse normed on a nationally representative sample of adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1194-1214. doi:10.1177/0886260510368157

Follingstad

D. R.

Coyne

Gambone

(2005). A representative measure of psychological aggression and its severity. Violence and Victims, 20, 25-38. doi:10.1891/vivi.2005.20.1.25

Follingstad

D. R.

Rogers

M. J.

(2012). Women experiencing psychological abuse: Are they a homogenous group? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 21, 891-916. doi:10.1080/10926771.2012.708012

Follingstad

D. R.

Rogers

M. J.

Duvall

J. L.

(2012). Factors predicting relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment when women report high prevalence of psychological abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 257-273. doi:10.1007/s10896-012-9422-8

Hamberger

L. K.

Hastings

J. E.

(1986). Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: A cross-validation study. Journal of Family Violence, 1, 323-341. doi:10.1007/BF00978276

Holtzworth-Munroe

Stuart

G. L.

(1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476

10.

Jackson

S. M.

(1999). Issues in the dating violence research: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4, 233-247. doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(97)00049-9

11.

Johnson

M. P.

(1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283-294. doi:10.2307/353683

12.

Jordan

C. E.

Campbell

Follingstad

D. R.

(2010). Violence against women: Physical, sexual, and psychological aggression In Nolen-Hoeksema

Cannon

T. D.

Widiger

T. A.

(Eds.), Annual review of clinical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 607-628). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

13.

Maiuro

R. D.

(2001). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will also hurt me: Psychological abuse in domestically violent relationships. In O’Leary

K. D.

Maiuro

R. D.

(Eds.), Psychological abuse in violent domestic relations (pp. ix-xx). New York: Springer.

14.

Markward

M. J.

(1996). Characteristics of sheltered women and intimates in sexually and nonsexually abusive relationships. Family Therapy, 23, 59-67.

15.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

I. H.

(1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

16.

O’Donnell

C. J.

Smith

Madison

J. R.

(2002). Using demographic risk factors to explain variations in the incidence of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1239-1262. doi:10.1177/088626002237854

17.

O’Leary

K. D.

(2001). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. In O’Leary

K. D.

Maiuro

R. D.

(Eds.), Psychological abuse in violent relations (pp. 3-28). New York: Springer.

18.

Saunders

D. G.

(1992). A typology of men who batter women: Three types derived from cluster analysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 264-275. doi:10.1037/h0079333

19.

Straus

M. A.

(1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 74-85. doi:10.2307/351733

20.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001

21.

Tweed

Dutton

D. G.

(1998). A comparison of instrumental and impulsive subgroups of batterers. Violence and Victims, 13, 217-230.