Dating violence victimization is associated with decreased relationship satisfaction and increased mental health symptomatology. Yet, violent dating relationships often remain intact across time, even when the aggression fails to cease. Thus, research is needed to determine the factors that reduce the negative impact of victimization. One factor may be that abusive dating partners are perceived as supportive by their partners, serving to reduce the negative impact of victimization. The current study sought to examine whether perceived support (i.e., perceptions of support) and capitalization support (i.e., perceptions of support for positive events) moderated and reduced the impact of dating violence victimization on decreased relationship satisfaction and increased depressive symptoms. Using a sample of females in dating relationships (N = 253), results provided partial support for our hypotheses. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonD. K.SaundersD. G.YoshihamaM.BybeeD. I.SullivanC. M. (2003). Long-term trends in depression among women separated from abusive partners. Violence Against Women, 9, 807-838.
3.
ArbuckleJ. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In MarcoulidesG. A.ShumakerR. E. (Eds.), Advances in structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
5.
BarreraM.Jr. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413-455.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
7.
BeebleM. L.BybeeD. I.SullivanC. M.AdamsA. E. (2009). Main, mediating, and moderating effects of social support on the well-being of survivors of intimate partner violence across 2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 718-729.
8.
BellK. M.NaugleA. E. (2007). Effects of social desirability on students’ self-reporting of partner abuse perpetration and victimization. Violence and Victims, 22, 243-256.
9.
CapaldiD. M.ShorttJ. W.CrosbyL. (2003). Physical and psychological aggression in at-risk young couples: Stability and change in young adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 1-27.
10.
CohenJ. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
11.
CohenS.PressmanS. (2004). The stress-buffering hypothesis. In AndersonN. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health and behavior (pp. 780-782). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
13.
CorneliusT. L.ShoreyR. C.BeebeS. M. (2010). Self-reported communication variables and dating violence: Using Gottman’s marital communication conceptualization. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 439-448.
14.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 37-67.
15.
DeKeseredyW.SchwartzM. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet. Available from http://www.vawnet.org
16.
GableS. L.GonzagaG.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904-917.
17.
GableS. L.ReisH. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 195-257). London, England: Elsevier.
18.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE. A.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228-245.
19.
HarnedM. S. (2001). Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 16, 269-285.
20.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 93-98.
21.
HendrickS. S.DickeA.HendrickC. (1998). The Relationship Assessment Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137-142.
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
23.
KatzJ.MooreJ.MayP. (2008). Physical and sexual covictimization from dating partners: A distinct type of intimate abuse?Violence Against Women, 14, 961-980.
24.
KauraS. A.LohmanB. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 367-381.
25.
KauraS. A.LohmanB. J. (2009). Does acceptability of violence impact the relationship between satisfaction, victimization, and commitment levels in emerging adult dating relationships?Journal of Family Violence, 24, 349-359.
26.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
27.
LakeyB.CroninA. (2008). Low social support and major depression: Research, theory and methodological issues. In DobsonK. S.DozoisD. (Eds.), Risk factors for depression (pp. 385-408). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
LakeyB.ScoboriaA. (2005). The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 73, 361-388.
29.
LittleR. J.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
30.
MacCallumR. C.ZhangS.PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
31.
MarcusR. F.SwettB. (2002).Violence and intimacy in close relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 570-586.
32.
MarshallL. L.WestonR.HoneycuttT. C. (2000). Does men’s positivity moderate or mediate the effects of their abuse on women’s relationship quality?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 660-675.
33.
MartensM. P.MartinJ. L.HatchettS. E.FowlerR. M.FlemingK. M.KarakashianM. A.CiminiM. D. (2008). Protective behavioral strategies and the relationship between depressive symptoms and alcohol-related negative consequences among college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 535-541.
34.
MurphyC. M.HooverS. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14, 39-53.
35.
ProsperoM. (2007). Mental health symptoms among male victims or partner violence. American Journal of Men’s Health, 1, 269-277.
36.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
37.
RhatiganD. L.StreetA. E. (2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: A test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1580-1597.
38.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
39.
SchnurrM. P.LohmanB. J.KauraS. A. (2010). Variation in late adolescents’ reports of dating violence perpetration: A dyadic analysis. Violence and Victims, 25, 84-100.
40.
SchumacherJ. A.LeonardK. E. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ marital adjustment, verbal aggression, and physical aggression as longitudinal predictors of physical aggression in early marriage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 28-37.
41.
ShoreyR. C.CorneliusT. L.BellK. M. (2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: Comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 185-194.
42.
SkomorovskyA.MathesonK.AnismanH. (2006). The buffering role of social support perceptions in relation to eating disturbances among women in abusive dating relationships. Sex Roles, 54, 627-638.
43.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
44.
TomarkenA. J.WallerN. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31-65.
45.
VegaE. M.O’LearyK. D. (2007). Test-retest reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). Journal of Family Violence, 22, 703-708.
46.
WalkerL. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
