Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-6
The Psychometric Properties of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA) With a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Youth
This article describes a new instrument that assesses adolescent dating abuse (ADA) victimization and perpetration. The Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA) is a comprehensive instrument that includes items on physical, sexual, and psychological ADA, as well as cyber dating abuse, social control, and invasion of privacy. Data for this study came from a population-based, nationally representative sample of adolescents ages 11 to 21 years old (N = 1,257). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the victimization and perpetration versions of the MARSHA, and convergent and divergent validity were assessed using the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) and the juvenile victimization questionnaire (JVQ), respectively. Results suggest that the MARSHA has good reliability and validity, and that each subscale had good internal consistency. The authors propose that the MARSHA may be a strong alternative to the CADRI or the conflict tactics scale (CTS) because it reflects contemporary forms of abuse, such as online harassment and pressure to send nude selfies, and the nonconsensual dissemination of sexually explicit images.
AckardD., EisenbergM., & Neumark-SztainerD. (2007). Long-term impact of adolescent dating violence on the behavioral and psychological health of male and female youth. Journal of Pediatrics, 151(5), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.034
AuerswaldM., & MoshagenM. (2019). How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 468–491.
BlockJ., & KremenA. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.349
7.
BonettD. G., & PriceR. M. (2005). Inferential methods for the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030002213
8.
ChildD. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis (3rd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.
9.
CokerA. L., McKeownR. E., SandersonM., DavisK. E., ValoisR. F., & HuebnerE. S. (2000). Severe dating violence and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00227-0
10.
DahlbergL. L., ToalS. B., & BehrensC. B. (1998). Measuring violence-related attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors among youth: A compendium of assessment tools. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
11.
DavisJ. P., PortsK. A., BasileK. C., EspelageD. L., & David-FerdonC. F. (2019). Understanding the buffering effects of protective factors on the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and teen dating violence perpetration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(12), 2343–2359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01028-9
DerogatisL. R. (1992). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Clinical Psychometric Research.
14.
DerogatisL. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Pearson.
15.
DuerksenK. N., & WoodinE. M. (2021). Cyber dating abuse victimization: Links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), NP10077–NP10105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519872982
16.
EstefanL. F., Vivolo-KantorA. M., NiolonP. H., LeV. D., TracyA. J., LittleT. D., & McIntoshW. L. (2020). Effects of the dating matters (R) comprehensive prevention model on health- and delinquency-related risk behaviors in middle school youth: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01114-6
17.
Exner-CortensD., EckenrodeJ., & RothmanE. (2013). Longitudinal associations between teen dating violence victimization and adverse health outcomes. Pediatrics, 131(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1029
18.
Exner-CortensD., GillL., & EckenrodeJ. (2016). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 1, behaviors). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007
19.
FabrigarL. R., WegenerD. T., MacCallumR. C., & StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
20.
FinkelhorD., HambyS. L., OrmrodR. K., & TurnerH. A. (2005). The juvenile victimization questionnaire: Reliability, validity, and national norms. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(4), 383–412.
21.
FollingstadD. R., & BushH. M. (2014). Measurement of intimate partner violence: A model for developing the gold standard. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037515
22.
GaraigordobilM. (2017). Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying test, a screening instrument to measure cybervictimization, cyberaggression, and cyberobservation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(23), 3556–3576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515600165
23.
HambyS. (2014). Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence: A multi-study investigation. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038207
24.
HambyS., FinkelhorD., OrmrodR., & TurnerH. (2005). The juvenile victimization questionnaire (JVQ): Administration and scoring manual. Crimes against Children Research Center.
25.
HebertM., DaspeM. E., LapierreA., GodboutN., BlaisM., FernetM., & LavoieF. (2019). A meta-analysis of risk and protective factors for dating violence victimization: The role of family and peer interpersonal context. Trauma Violence Abuse, 20(4), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017725336
LinW.-L., & YaoG. (2014). Concurrent validity. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.),Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1184–1185). Springer.
28.
LoeberR., & DishionT. J. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 68–94.
29.
LoeberR., & Stouthamer-LoeberM. (1987). The prediction of delinquency. In H. C. Quay (Ed.),Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 325–382). Wiley.
30.
LuY., ShoreyR. C., GreeleyC. S., & TempleJ. R. (2019). Childhood physical abuse and physical dating violence in young adulthood: The mediating role of adverse mental health. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(10), 1916–1929. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22827
NunnallyJ. C., & BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.
34.
PiedmontR. L. (2014). Construct validity. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.),Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1212–1213). Springer.
35.
RizzoC. J., JoppaM. C., BarkerD., ZlotnickC., WarrenJ., CadelyH. S., & BrownL. K. (2020). Individual and relationship characteristics of adolescent girls with histories of physical dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(5–6), 1389–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517696859
36.
RothmanE. F., ParukJ., CuevasC. A., TempleJ. R., & GonzalesK. (2020). The development of the Measure of Adolescent Relationship Harassment and Abuse (MARSHA): Input from Black and Multiracial, Latinx, Native American, and LGBTQ+ Youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520936367
37.
SmithJ., MulfordC., LatzmanN. E., TharpA. T., NiolonP. H., & Blachman-DemnerD. (2015). Taking stock of behavioral measures of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(5), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1049767
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
40.
TaylorB., & MumfordE. (2016). A national descriptive portrait of adolescent relationship abuse: Results from the National Survey on Teen Relationships and Intimate Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(6), 963–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514564070
41.
WincentakK., ConnollyJ., & CardN. (2017). Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040194
42.
WolfeD. A., ScottK., Reitzel-JaffeD., WekerleC., GrasleyC., & StraatmanA. L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.13.2.277
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
