AbramsK. (1995). Sex wars redux: Agency and coercion in feminist legal theory. Columbia Law Review, 95, 304-376.
2.
AbramsK. (1999). From autonomy to agency: Feminist perspectives on self-direction. William & Mary Law Review, 40, 805-846.
3.
BaileyK. D. (2010). Lost in translation: Domestic violence, “the personal is political,” and the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 1255-1300.
4.
BellM. E.PerezS.GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A. (2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17, 71-88.
5.
BeloofD. E.2005. The third wave of victims’ rights: Standing, remedy, and review. B.Y.U. Law Review, 2, 255-370.
6.
BennettL.GoodmanL.DuttonM. A. (1999). Systemic obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner: A victim perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 761-772.
7.
BibasS. (2006). Transparency and participation in criminal procedure. New York University Law Review, 81, 911-966.
8.
CampbellR. (2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems: Do rape victim advocates make a difference?Violence Against Women, 12, 30-45.
9.
CampbellR.RajaS. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97-106.
10.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2010). Through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence: The relationship between empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 481-502.
11.
ChamallasM. (2003). Introduction to feminist legal theory96 (2nd ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business.
12.
GardnerD. (2007). Justice delayed is, once again, justice denied: The overdue right to counsel in civil cases. University of Baltimore Law Review, 37, 59.
13.
GoodmarkL. (2009). Autonomy feminism: An anti-essentialist critique of mandatory interventions in domestic violence cases. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/leigh_goodmark/6
14.
HandlerJ. F. (1988). Dependent people, the state, and the modern/postmodern search for the dialogic community. UCLA Law Review, 35, 999-1113.
15.
HermanJ. L. (2003). The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 159-166.
16.
KellyD. P. (1983-1984). Victims’ perceptions of criminal justice. Pepperdine Law Review, 11, 15-22.
17.
KilpatrickD. G.OttoR. K. (1987). Constitutionally guaranteed participation in criminal proceedings for victims: Potential effects on psychological functioning. Wayne Law Review, 34, 7-28.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. (2009). Civil protective order outcome: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 675-692.
20.
National Crime Victim Law Institute. (2010). Fundamentals of victims’ rights: A brief history of crime victims’ rights. Portland, OR: Author.
21.
NedelskyJ. (1989). Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 1, 7-36.
22.
OrthU. (2002). Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Social Justice Research, 15, 313-325.
23.
ParsonsJ.BerginT. (2010). The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims’ mental health. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, 182-188.
24.
SmithA. (2000). It’s my decision, isn’t it?: A research note on battered women’s perceptions of mandatory intervention laws. Violence Against Women, 6, 1384-1402.
25.
StrangH.ShermanL. W. (2003). Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah Law Review, 15, 20-21.
26.
Van CleaveR. A. (2007). Rape and the querela in Italy: False protection of victim agency. Michigan Journal of Gender and the Law, 13, 273-310.