The article explores some of the ways heterosexual women are portrayed as perpetrators of intimate partner domestic violence (IPV) in police domestic violence records in England and is the first study in the United Kingdom to examine the issue of gender and domestic violence perpetrators in any detail and over time. The article is based on a study of 128 IPV cases tracked longitudinally over 6 years, including 32 cases where women were the sole perpetrators and a further 32 cases where women were “dual” perpetrators alongside men. Women were 3 times more likely than men to be arrested when they were construed as the perpetrator. However, Pence and Dasgupta’s category of “pathological violence” appeared more useful as an analytical category in the construction of women as “perpetrators” and men as “victims” than the notion of “battering.”
AndersonK.UmbersonD. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358-380.
2.
BuschA. L.RosenbergM. S. (2004). Comparing women and men arrested for domestic violence: A preliminary report. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 49-57.
3.
BuzawaE. S.BuzawaC. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. London: Sage.
4.
California Penal Code §13701 (2003). Newark, NJ: Matthew Bender & Co., Inc.
5.
Centrex. (2004). Guidance on investigating domestic violence. Bramshill, UK: National Centre for Policing Excellence on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers.
6.
ConnellR. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
7.
CrenshawK. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In FinemanM. A.MykitiukR. (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93-118). New York: Routledge.
8.
DeLeon-GranadosW.WellsW.BinsbacherR. (2006). Arresting developments: Trends in female arrests for domestic violence and proposed explanations. Violence Against Women, 12, 355-371.
DownsW. R.RindelsB.AtkinsonC. (2007). Women’s use of physical and nonphysical self-defense strategies during incidents of partner violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 28-45.
11.
EdlesonJ. L. (1998). Violent women: Fact and fantasy—social service agencies have a responsibility to know the difference. Domestic Abuse Project Training and Research Update, p. 3.
12.
FitzroyL. (2001). Violent women: Questions for feminist theory, practice and policy. Critical Social Policy, 21, 7-34.
13.
HesterM. (2006). Making it through the criminal justice system: Attrition and domestic violence. Social Policy and Society, 5, 79-90.
14.
HesterM. (2010). Gender and Sexuality. In ItzinC.TaketA.Barter-GodfreyS. (Eds.), Domestic And Sexual Violence And Abuse: Tackling The Health And Mental Health Effects (pp. 99-113). London: Routledge.
15.
HesterM.WestmarlandN.GangoliG.WilkinsonM.O’KellyC.KentA. (2006). Domestic violence perpetrators: Identifying needs to inform early intervention. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol in association with the Northern Rock Foundation and the Home Office.
16.
HesterM.WestmarlandN.PearceJ.WilliamsonE. (2008). Early evaluation of the Domestic Violence, Crimes and Victims Act 2004 (Ministry of Justice Research Series 14/08). London: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/domestic-violence-report-2004.pdf
17.
HirschelD.BuzawaE. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8, 1449-1473.
18.
HirschelD.BuzawaE.PattavinaA.FaggianiD. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 255-298.
19.
Home Office. (2000). Domestic violence: Revised circular to the Police Circular 19/2000, a revision of Home Office Circular 60/90—Domestic violence. London: Author.
HumphreysC.ReganL.RiverD.ThiaraR. (2005). Domestic violence and substance use: Tackling complexity. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 1-18.
22.
JaffeP.LemonN.PoissonS. (2003). Child custody & domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018.
24.
McMahonM.PenceE. (2003). Making social change: Reflections on individual and institutional advocacy with women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 47-74.
25.
MillerS. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s violence in relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
MillerS. L.MeloyM. L. (2006). Women’s use of force: Voices of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 89-115.
27.
PenceE.DasguptaS. D. (2006). Re-examining “battering”: Are all acts of intimate partner violence the same?Duluth, MN: Praxis International.
28.
RadfordL.HesterM. (2006). Mothering through domestic violence. London: Jessica Kingsley.
29.
RitchieJ.LewisJ. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
SaundersD. G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victim of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 147-158.
31.
SaundersD. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424-1448.
32.
SlashinskiM. J.CokerA. L.DivsK. E. (2003). Physical aggression, forced sex, and stalking victimization by a dating partner: An analysis of the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence and Victims, 18, 595-617.
33.
SmithK.FlatleyJ.ColemanK.OsborneS.KaizaP.RoeS. (Eds.). (2010). Homicides, firearms offences and intimate violence 2008/09 (Home Office Statistical Bulletin 01/10). London: Home Office.
34.
StankoE. A. (1989). Improving policing for women: The way forward. In HanmerJ.RadfordJ.StankoE. A. (Eds.), Policing and male violence: International perspectives (pp. 185-201). London: Macmillan.
35.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
