Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article reviews current epistemological and design issues in the mixed methods literature and then examines the application of one specific design, a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, in an evaluation of a community-based intervention to improve postassault care for sexual assault survivors. Guided by a pragmatist epistemological framework, this study collected quantitative and qualitative data to understand how the implementation of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) program affected prosecution rates of adult sexual assault cases in a large midwestern community. Quantitative results indicated that the program was successful in affecting legal systems change and the qualitative data revealed the mediating mechanisms of the intervention’s effectiveness. Challenges of implementing this design are discussed, including epistemological and practical difficulties that developed from blending methodologies into a single project.

Keywords

mixed methods qualitative quantitative rape sexual assault

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergman, M. M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. London, UK: SAGE.

Bogdan, R.C. , & Biklen, S.K. ( 2007). Qualitative research for education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Campbell, R. ( 2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape . New York: Routledge.

Campbell, R. ( 2008). The psychological impact of rape victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 68, 702-717.

Campbell, R. , Patterson, D. , Adams, A. , Diegel, R. , & Coats, S. ( 2008). A participatory evaluation project to measure SANE nursing practice and adult sexual assault patients’ psychological well-being . Journal of Forensic Nursing, 4, 19-28.

Campbell, R. , Patterson, D. , & Lichty, L.F. ( 2005). The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: A review of psychological, medical, legal, and community outcomes . Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 313-329.

Crandall, C. , & Helitzer, D. ( 2003). Impact evaluation of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) program (NIJ Document No: 203276; Award Number 98-WT-VX-0027). Albuquerque, NM: Albuquerque SANE Collaborative

Creswell, J.W. , & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Creswell, J.W. , Plano Clark, V.L. , Gutmann, M.L. , & Hanson, W.E. ( 2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

10.

Erickson, F. ( 1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.

11.

Greene, J.C. ( 2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Greene, J. C. , & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation No. 74). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .

13.

Greene, J.C. , & Caracelli, V.J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

14.

Howe, K.R. ( 1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatability thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17, 10-16.

15.

Human Rights Watch. (2009). Testing justice: The rape kit backlog in Los Angeles City and County. New York: Author.

16.

International Association of Forensic Nurses. ( 2008). Data base of the International Association of Forensic Nurses. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://www.forensicnurse.org

17.

Jordan, C.E. ( 2009). Advancing the study of violence against women: Evolving research agendas into science. Violence Against Women, 15, 393-419.

18.

Kazdin, A.E. ( 2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146-159.

19.

Ledray, L. ( 1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development & operations guide. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice .

20.

Littel, K. ( 2001). Sexual assault nurse examiner programs: Improving the community response to sexual assault victims. Office for Victims of Crime Bulletin, 4, 1-19.

21.

Martin, P.Y. ( 2005). Rape work: Organizations and rape victims. New York: Routledge.

22.

Miles, M.B. , & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher , 13, 20-30.

23.

Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

24.

Rallis, S.F. , & Rossman, G.B. ( 2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic approach . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 491-512). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

25.

Robinson, W.S. ( 1951). The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, 16, 812-818.

26.

Shadish, W.R. , Cook, T.D. , & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

27.

Spohn, C. , Beichner, D. , & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the "gateway to justice." Social Problems, 48, 206-235.

28.

Tashakkori, A. , & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

29.

Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. ( 2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

30.

World Health Organization. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

13.66 MB

Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate a Community Intervention for Sexual Assault Survivors: A Methodological Tale

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material