There is growing interest in understanding how different research methods are perceived by victims of violence and what survivors will reveal to researchers (termed meta-research or meta-studies). The purpose of this project was to conduct a qualitative meta-study on why rape survivors chose to participate in community-based, face-to-face interviews. Participants mentioned four primary reasons for why they decided to participate in this study: (a) to help other survivors, (b) to help themselves, (c) to support research on rape/sexual assault, and (d) to receive financial compensation. Implications for designing research recruitment protocols are discussed.
Baker, L., Lavender, T., & Tincello, D. (2005). Factors that influence women's decisions about whether to participate in research: An exploratory study. Birth, 32, 60-66.
2.
Campbell, R., Adams, A.E., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E., & Sefl, T. (2008). What has it been like for you to talk with me today? The impact of participating in community interview research on rape survivors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3.
Campbell, R., Sefl, T., Barnes, H.E., Ahrens, C.E., Wasco, S.M., & Zaragoza-Diesfeld, Y. (1999). Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 847-858.
4.
Campbell, R., Sefl, T., Wasco, S.M., & Ahrens, C.E. (2004). Doing community research without a community: Creating safe space for rape survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 253-261.
5.
Campbell, R., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H.E. (2001). Preventing the "second rape": Rape survivors' experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.
6.
DiLillo, D., DeGue, S., Kras, A., Di Loreto-Colgan, A.R., & Nash, C. (2006). Participant responses to retrospective surveys of child maltreatment: Does mode of assessment matters? Violence and Victims, 21, 410-424.
7.
Ellis, P.M. (2000). Attitudes toward and participation in randomized clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literatures. Annals of Oncology, 11, 939-945.
8.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
9.
Groves, R.M., Cialdini, R.B., & Couper, M.P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475-495.
10.
Hiller, H.H., & DiLuzio, L. (2004). The interviewee and the research interview: Analysing a neglected dimension in research. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41, 1-26.
11.
Liaschenko, J., & Underwood, S.M. (2001). Children in research: Fathers in cancer research meanings and reasons for participation. Journal of Family Nursing, 7, 71-91.
12.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Newman, E., Kaloupek, D.G., Keane, T.M., & Folstein, S.F. (1997). Ethical issues in trauma research: The evolution of an empirical model for decision making. In G. K. Kantor & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 271-281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Newman, E., Risch, E., & Kassam-Adams, N. (2006). Ethical issues in trauma-related research: A review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 29-46.
15.
Newman, E., Walker, E.A., & Gefland, A. (1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21, 187-196.
16.
Pennebaker, J.W. (1997). Opening up: The health power of emotional expression . New York: Guilford.
17.
Reddy, M.K., Fleming, M.T., Howells, N.L., Rabenhorst, M.M., Casselman, R., & Rosenbaum, A. (2006). Effect of method on participants and disclosure rates in research on sensitive topics. Violence and Victims , 21, 499-506.
18.
Rosenbaum, A., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2006). Meta-research on violence and victims: The impact of data collection methods on findings and participants . Violence and Victims, 21, 404-409.
19.
Rosenbaum, A., Rabenhorst, M.M., Reddy, M.K., Fleming, M.T., & Howells, N.L. (2006). A comparison of methods for collecting self-report data on sensitive topics. Violence and Victims, 21, 461-471.
20.
Sullivan, C.M., & Cain, D. (2004). Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 603-618.
21.
Thompson, S.K., & Seber, G.A.F. (1996). Adaptive sampling. New York : Wiley.
