This article seeks to identify the variables that predict intimate partner violence recidivism. Neither prosecutorial actions, such as case rejection or subsequent dismissal, nor judicial imposition of jail terms or placement in a batterer treatment program demonstrated predictive value. Extralegal variables associated with the defendant, such as cohabitation status, marital status, gender, employment, and substance use at the time of the incident, all failed to attain significance. Victim support for arrest and prosecution were also unrelated to revictimization. Conversely, use of a weapon, the offender’s prior arrest for any offense, and the presence of a protective order at the time of the precipitating incident all predicted rearrest for intimate violence within an 18-month follow-up period. Policy implications are discussed.
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
2.
Binder, A., & Meeker, J. (1992). The development of social attitudes towards spousal abuse. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 3-19). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
3.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Cahn, N. R. (1992). Innovative approaches to the prosecution of domestic violence crimes: An overview. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 161-180). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
5.
Chaudhuri, M., & Daly, K. (1992). Do restraining orders help? Battered women’s experience with male violence and legal process. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 227-254). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
6.
Corsilles, A. (1994). No-drop policies in the prosecution of domestic violence cases: Guarantee to action or dangerous solution. Fordham Law Review, 63, 853-881.
7.
Davis, R. C., Smith, B. E., & Nickles, L. B. (1998). The deterrent effect of prosecuting domestic violence misdemeanors. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 434-442.
8.
Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10, 69-93.
9.
Dunford, F. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spousal assault. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 120-136.
10.
Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of intervention for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468-476.
11.
Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19, 343-375.
12.
Feeley, M. (1979). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Russell Sage.
13.
Fleury, R. E. (2002). Missing voices: Patterns of battered women’s satisfaction with the criminal legal system. Violence Against Women, 8, 181-205.
14.
Ford, D. A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-334.
15.
Ford, D. A. (2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 669-684.
16.
Ford, D. A., & Regoli, M. J. (1992). The preventive impacts of policies for prosecuting wife batterers. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 181-207). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
17.
Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Hanna, C. (1996). No right to choose: Mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard Law Review, 109, 1849-1910.
19.
Harrell, A., & Smith, B. E. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 214-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313-336.
21.
Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the spousal assault replication program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
22.
Mills, L. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 306-318.
23.
Rebovich, D. J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Schmidt, J. D., & Sherman, L. W. (1996). Does arrest deter domestic violence. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 176-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Sherman, L. W. (2003). Misleading evidence and evidence-led policy: Making social science more experimental. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 6-19.
26.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. S. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 4, 261-272.
27.
Sherman, L. W., Smith, D. A., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
28.
Smith, B. E., Davis, R., Nickles, L. B., & Davies, H. J. (2001). An evaluation of efforts to implement no-drop policies: Two central values in conflict. Final report. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
29.
Taylor, B. G., Davis, R. C., & Maxwell, C. D. (2001). The effects of a group batterer treatment program: A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly, 18, 171-202.
30.
Thistlethwaite, A., Woolredge, J., & Gibbs, D. (1998). Severity of dispositions and domestic violence recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 388-398.
31.
Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 481-495.
32.
U.S. Government, Bureau of the Census. (2000). American Fast Finder. Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://www.census.gov
33.
Woolredge, J., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2002). Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 45-70.
34.
Woolredge, J., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2005). Court dispositions and rearrest for intimate assault. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 75-102.
35.
Zorza, J. (1992). Symposium on domestic violence: The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 46-72.
