To reach out to women from different backgrounds, the battered women’s movement needs to place women and their informal supports at the center of a coordinated response. This article shares the views of domestic violence survivors, staff, and supporters on how to create such a coordinated and inclusive response, lays a conceptual foundation for a decision-making forum called safety conferencing, and sets forth guidance for its practice. Safety conferencing is proposed as one means of building the individual and collective strength to reshape connections, make sound choices, and promote the safety of women and children from diverse cultures.
Ahrens, L. (1980). Battered women’s refuges: Feminist cooperatives v. social service institutions. Radical America, 14, 41-47.
2.
Allen, P. G. (1986). The sacred hoop: Recovering the feminine in American Indian traditions. Boston: Beacon.
3.
Bancroft, L., & Silverman, J. G. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Burford, G., & Hudson, J. (Eds.). (2000). Family group conferences: New directions in community-centered child and family practice. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
5.
Burford, G., & Pennell, J. (1998). Family group decision making: After the conference—Progress in resolving violence and promoting well-being: Outcome report (Vols. 1-2). St. John’s, Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland, School of Social Work.
6.
Burford, G., Pennell, J., & MacLeod, S. (1995). Family group decision making: Manual for coordinators and communities. Memorial University of Newfoundland, School of Social Work, St. John’s, Canada: Family Group Decision Making Project. Available at social.chass.ncsu.edu/jpennell/fgdm/Manual.
7.
Bushie, B. (1997). A personal journey. In The four circles of Hollow Water. Hull, Canada: Aboriginal Peoples Collection, Aboriginal Corrections Policy Unit, Supply and Services Canada.
8.
Callahan, M. (1993). Feminist approaches: Women recreate child welfare. In B. Wharf (Ed.), Rethinking child welfare in Canada (pp. 172-209). Toronto, Canada:McClell and & Stewart.
9.
Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A contextual and longitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 743-762.
10.
Carrillo, R., & Carter, J. [with Bayless, L. & Bird, C.]. (2001). Guidelines for conducting family team conferences when there is a history of domestic violence. San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund.
11.
Combahee River Collective. (2001). A Black feminist statement. In B. Ryan (Ed.), Identity politics in the women’s movement (pp. 59-66). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1979)
12.
Crampton, D. S. (2001). Making sense of foster care: An evaluation of family group decision making in Kent County, Michigan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
13.
Derrida, J. (1981). Positions (A. Base, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1972)
14.
Edleson, J. L. (1999). The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering. Violence Against Women, 5, 134-154.
15.
Edleson, J. L. (2004). Should childhood exposure to adult domestic violence be defined as child maltreatment under the law? In P. G. Jaffe, L. L. Baker, & A. Cunningham (Eds.), Ending domestic violence in the lives of children and parents: Promising practices for safety, healing, and prevention (pp. 8-29). New York: Guilford.
16.
Evans, S. (1979). Personal politics: The roots of women’s liberation in the civil rights movement and the new Left. New York: Vintage.
17.
Francis, S. (2002). Results of focus groups with domestic-violence advocates. Unpublished paper, North Carolina Family Group Conferencing Project, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
18.
Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, implications and outcomes of a multi-site evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Goodkind, J. R., Gillum, T. L., Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2003). The impact of family and friends’ reactions on the well-being of women with abusive partners. Violence Against Women, 9, 347-373.
20.
Gunderson, K., Cahn, K., & Wirth, J. (2003). The Washington State long-term outcome study. Protecting Children, 18, 42-47.
21.
Hassall, I. (1996). Origin and development of family group conferences. In J. Hudson, A. Morris, G. Maxwell, & B. Galaway (Eds.), Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy and practice (pp. 17-36). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
22.
Helms, J. E. (1994). The conceptualization of racial identity and other “racial” constructs. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts,& D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 285-311). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End.
24.
Lupton, C., & Nixon, P. (1999). Empowering practice? A critical appraisal of the family group conference approach. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
25.
Marsh, P., & Crow, G. (1998). Family group conferences in child welfare. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Martin, M. E. (1997). Policy promise: Community policing and domestic violence victim’s satisfaction. Policing: AnInternationalJournalofPoliceStrategiesandManagement, 20, 519-531.
27.
McGillivray, A., & Comaskey, B. (1999). Black eyes all of the time: Intimate violence, aboriginal women, and the justice system. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
28.
Mederos, F. (1999). Batterer intervention programs: The past and future prospects. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 127-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Merkel-Holguin, L., Nixon, P., & Burford, G. (2003). Promising results, potential new directions: International FGDM research and evaluation in child welfare. Protecting Children, 18(Special Issue, 1/2), 2-11.
30.
New Zealand Department of Social Welfare. (1999). Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1989 (Amended 1994): Information pack for NZCYPS staff. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
31.
North Carolina Family Group Conferencing Project. (2002). Family group conferencing in child welfare: Practice guidance for planning, implementing, training, and evaluation. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, Social Work Program. Available at social.chass.ncsu.edu/jpennell/ncfgcp/pracguid
32.
Paterson, K., & Harvey, M. (1991). An evaluation of the organisation and operation of care and protection family group conferences. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Social Welfare.
33.
Pence, E. L., & Shepard, M. L. (1999). An introduction: Developing a coordinated community response. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 3-23). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
34.
Pennell, J. (1987). Ideology at a Canadian shelter for battered women: A reconstruction. Women’s Studies International Forum, 10, 113-123.
35.
Pennell, J., & Anderson, G. (in press). Widening the circle: The practice and evaluation of family group conferencing with children, young persons, and their families. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
36.
Pennell, J., & Burford, G. (1994). Widening the circle: The family group decision making project. Journal of Child and Youth Care, 9(1), 1-12.
37.
Pennell, J., & Burford, G. (1995). Family group decision making: New roles for old partners in resolving family violence: Implementation report (Vol. 1-2). St. John’s, Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland, School of Social Work.
38.
Pennell, J., & Burford, G. (2000a). Family group decision making: Protecting children and women. Child Welfare, 79, 131-158.
39.
Pennell, J., & Burford, G. (2000b). Family group decision making and family violence. In G. Burford & J. Hudson (Eds.), Family group conferences: New directions in community-centered child and family practice (pp. 171-185). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
40.
Pennell, J., & Burford, G. (2002). Feminist praxis: Making family group conferencing work. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence: New ideas and learning from the past (pp. 108-127). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: The making of social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Ptacek, J. (1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
43.
Rangihau, J. (1986). Pau-te-Ata-tu (Daybreak): Report of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori perspective for the Department of Social Welfare. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Social Welfare, Government Printing Office.
44.
Rothman, S. M. (1978). Woman’s proper place; A history of changing ideals and practices, 1970 to the present. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Ryan, B. (Ed.). (2001). Identity politics in the women’s movement. New York: New York University Press.
46.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston: South End Press.
47.
Schechter, S. (1999, January). New challenges for the battered women’s movement: Building collaborations and improving public policy for poor women. Violence against Women On-line Resources. Available: www.vaw.umn.edu
48.
Social Services and Research Information Unit. (2003, June). The Dove Project: The Basingstoke domestic violence family group conference project. Portsmouth, UK: University of Portsmouth.
49.
Strang, H., & Braithwaite, J. (Eds.). (2002). Restorative justice and family violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Sullivan, G. (1982). Cooptation of alternative services: The battered women’s movement as a case study. Catalyst, 4(2), 38-56.
51.
Thorne, B. [with Yalom M.] (Ed.). (1982). Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions. New York: Longman.
52.
Trotter, C., Sheehan, R., Liddell, M., Strong, D., & Laragy, C. (1999). Evaluation of the statewide implementation of family group conferencing. Victoria, Australia: Department of Human Services.
53.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. (2000). Child maltreatment 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Available at www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/publications/cm00
54.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Prisoners in 2001 (Bulletin NCJ 195189). Washington, DC: Author.
55.
Valverde, M. (1991). The age of light, soap, and water: Moral reform in English Canada 1885-1925. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
56.
Vickers, J. (1991). Bending the iron law of oligarchy: Debates on the feminization of organization and political process in the English Canadian women’s movement, 1970-1988. In J. D. Wine & J. L. Ristock (Eds.), Women and social change: Feminist activism in Canada (pp. 75-94). Toronto, Canada: James Lorimer.
57.
Waites, C., Macgowan, M., Pennell, J., Carlton-LaNey, I., & Weil, M. (2004). Increasing the cultural responsiveness of family group conferencing: Advancing child welfare practice. Social Work, 49(2), 291-300.
58.
Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc. (2000). The Santa Clara County family conference model outcome report. Sacramento, CA: Author.
