The community response to domestic violence has been characterized by a lack of coordination across systems. Recent efforts have focused on bringing together stakeholders from an array of community sectors to promote a comprehensive response. Coordinating councils are commonly employed to encourage such a response, yet little is known about the extent to which they effectively promote community change. This study examined 41 councils in one state to better understand (a) the types of issues they addressed, (b) the extent to which they reported accomplishing their goals, and (c) the degree to which councils' climate and membership influenced the extent to which they achieved their goals within the criminal justice system and in other community sectors (e.g., health care, human service).
Abbott, B., Jordan, P., & Murtaza, N. (1995). Interagency collaboration for children's mental health services: The San Mateo County model for managed care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 22, 301-313.
2.
Allen, N. E. (2001). An overview of domestic violence coordinating councils, committees and task forces in the State of Michigan. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
3.
Allen, N. E. (2005). A multi-level analysis of community coordinating councils. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(1/2), 49-63.
4.
Allen, N. E., Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2004). Battered women's multitude of needs: Evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence Against Women, 10, 1-21.
5.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein& S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions(pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Burt, M. R., Newmark, L. C., Jacobs, L. K.,& Harrell, A. V. (1998). Evaluation of the STOPFormula Grants under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
8.
Butterfoss, F. D. (1998). Coalition Effectiveness Inventory (CEI) Self Assessment Tool. Norfolk, VA: Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Center for Pediatric Research.
9.
Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8, 315-330.
10.
Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23, 65-79.
11.
Clark, S. J., Burt, M. R., Schulte, M. M., & Maguire, K. (1996). Coordinated community responses to domestic violence in six communities: Beyond the justice system(Final report to the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
12.
Edwards, L. P. (1992). Reducing family violence: The role of the family violence council. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 43(3), 1-18.
13.
Florin, P., Giamartino, G., Kenny, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Levels of analysis and effects: Clarifying group influence and climate by separating individual and group effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 881-900.
14.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. E. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: Areviewand integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 241-261.
15.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Perkins, D. F., & Davidson, W. S. (1997). Developing effective evaluation partnerships: Paradigmatic and contextual barriers. Anilise Psicologica, 3, 389-403.
16.
Gamache, D.,& Asmus, M. (1999). Enhancing networking among service providers. In M. F. Shepard& E. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond(pp. 65-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.
18.
Giamartino, G. A., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Organizational climate correlations of viable urban block organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 529-541.
19.
Gondolf, E. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
20.
Hart, B. J. (1995, March). Coordinated community approaches to domestic violence. Paper presented at The Strategic Planning Workshop on Violence Against Women, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2000, from www.mincava.umn.edu/documents/hart/hart.pdf
21.
Himmelman, A. T. (1996). On the theory and practice of transformational collaboration: From social service to social justice. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage(pp. 19-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Himmelman, A. T. (2001). On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 277-284.
23.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
24.
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 4, 1055-1080.
25.
McEvoy, A., Brookings, J. B., & Brown, C. E. (1983, February). Responses to battered women: Problems and strategies. Social Casework, 64, 92-96.
26.
Pence, E. L., & Shepard, M. F. (1999). An introduction: Developing a coordinated community response. In M. F. Shepard& E. Pence (Eds.) Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond(pp. 3-24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Penner, S. (1995). Astudy of coalitions among HIV/AIDS service organizations. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 217-239.
28.
Prestby, J. E., & Wandersman, A. (1985). Organizational climate correlations of viable urban block organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 287-305.
29.
Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369-402.
30.
Schechter, S. (1999). New challenges for the battered women's movement: Building collaborations and improving public policy for poor women. Harrisburg, PA: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.
31.
Sullivan, C. M. (1991, August). Battered women as active helpseekers. Violence Update, pp. 1-8.
32.
Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using a community-based advocacy project for women with abusive partners: Two-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
33.
Sullivan, C. M., & Keefe, M. (1999, Fall). Evaluations of advocacy efforts to end intimate male violence against women. Michigan Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence (MCADSV) Review, pp. 3-3, 11-14.
34.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2000). Census 2000 data for the State of Michigan. Retrieved July 16, 2004, from www.census.gov/census2000/states/mi.html
