St. Pierre argues that the immanent concepts and onto-epistemological arrangements of scholars we call poststructural, postmodern, posthuman, and other “posts” do not enable preexisting, conventional, humanist 20th-century social science research methodologies that are not immanent. For that reason, scholars are now inventing and teaching new approaches to inquiry based on old philosophies of immanence in which those methodologies cannot be thought or done.
AyerA. J. (1936). Language, truth, and logic. Victor Gollancz.
2.
AyerA. J. (Ed.). (1959). Logical positivism. Free Press.
3.
BaradK. (1999). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In BiagioliM. (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
4.
BarthesR. (1986). The rustle of language (HowardR., Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1984)
5.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
6.
ButlerJ. (1995). For a careful reading. In BenhabibS.ButlerJ.CornellD.FaserN. (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127–143). Routledge.
7.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
8.
De LandaM. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. Continuum.
9.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
10.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
11.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.UrchellG. B., Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1991)
12.
DeleuzeG.ParnetC. (2007). Dialogues II (Revised ed., TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1997)
13.
DerridaJ. (1973). Differánce (AllisonD. B., Trans.). In AllisonD. B. (Ed.), Speech and phenomena: And other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (pp. 129–160). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1967)
14.
DerridaJ. (1974). Of grammatology (SpivakG. C., Trans.). The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
15.
DerridaJ. (2007). Psyche: Inventions of the other (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
16.
DeweyJ. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. Minto, Balch & Company.
17.
ElliotE. (1996). Viewpoints: Should novels count as dissertations in education?Research in the Teaching of English, 30(4), 403–427.
18.
FlaxJ. (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In NicholsonL. J. (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 39–62). Routledge.
19.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (SmithA. M. S., Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1966)
20.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (SmithA. M. S., Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1971)
21.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)
22.
FoucaultM. (1991). Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombardori (GoldsteinR. J.CascaitoJ., Trans.). Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1981)
23.
FoucaultM. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1975-76 (BertaniM.FontanaA., Eds., MaceyD., Trans.). Picador. (Original work published 1997)
24.
FreemanM.deMarraisK.PreissleJ.RoulstonK.StPierreE. A. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 25–32.
25.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). Basic Books.
26.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures (p. 15). Basic Books.
27.
HarawayD. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
28.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
29.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of a scientific revolution (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962)
30.
KuntzA. (2021). “Piercing this wall”: Truth-making in a fascist world. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 491–501.
31.
LangeF. (1866). The history of materialism and a critique of its current significance (DavisM., Trans.). No publisher.
32.
LatherP. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 525–545.
MillerJ. (1993). The passion of Michel Foucault. Doubleday.
38.
NietzscheF. (1992). On the genealogy of morals (KaufmannW., Trans.). In KaufmannW. (Ed.), Basic writings of Nietzsche (pp. 437–599). Modern Library. (Original work published 1887)
39.
PattonC. (2008). Finding “fields” in the field: Normalcy, risk, and ethnographic inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(2), 255–274.
40.
PattonP. (2000). Deleuze and the political. Routledge.
41.
RajchmanJ. (1985). Michel Foucault: The freedom of philosophy. Columbia University Press.
42.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Chicago Press.
43.
SpivakG. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.
44.
SteinmetzG. (2005). The epistemological unconscious of U.S. sociology and the transition to post-Fordism: The case of historical sociology. In AdamsJ.ClemensE. S.OrloffA.S. (Eds.), Remaking modernity: Politics, history, sociology (pp. 109–157). Duke University Press.
45.
StewartK. (2015, October14–17). Plenary [Conference session]. Affect Theory Conference. Lancaster, PA, United States.
46.
St. PierreE. A. (1995). Arts of existence: The construction of subjectivity in older, White southern women [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University].
47.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
48.
St. PierreE. A. (2001). Coming to theory: Finding Foucault and Deleuze. In WeilerK. (Ed.), Feminist engagements: Reading, resisting, and revisioning male theorists in education and cultural studies (pp. 141–163). Routledge.
49.
St. PierreE. A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124.
50.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719.
