In this article I introduce the theory and practice of Design Anthropological Filmmaking as a mode of actively proposing alternative possibilities to the technological solutionist narratives and imaginaries that dominate industry, government and policy narratives about automated futures. I argue for documentary practice that is theoretically and critically aligned with a vision of the world as ongoingly emergent, and unfinished, and contests conventional innovation paradigms. To demonstrate this theory-practice dialogue I draw on my collaborative documentaries Laundry Lives and Smart Homes for Seniors which explore everyday life in the home with digital, emerging and automated technologies.
AbdillaA. (2018). Beyond imperial tools: Future-proofing technology through indigenous governance and traditional knowledge systems. In HarleJ.AbdillaA.NewmanA. (Eds.), Technology as cultural practice (pp. 67–81). Tactical Space Lab.
AkamaY.PinkS.SumartojoS. (2018). Uncertainty and possibility. Bloomsbury.
4.
AndrejevicM. (2020). Automating media. Routledge.
5.
BerglundE.KohtalaC. (2021). Knowing and imagining with sustainable makers. In Kazubowski-HoustonM.AuslanderM. (Eds.), In search of lost futures: Anthropological explorations in multimodality, deep interdisciplinarity, and autoethnography (pp. 151–172). Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BryantR. E.KnightD. (2019). The anthropology of the future. Cambridge University Press.
7.
DahlgrenK.PinkS.StrengersY.NichollsL.SadowskiJ. (2021). Personalization and the Smart Home: Questioning techno-hedonist imaginaries. Convergence, 27(5), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211036801
8.
de FreitasE.TrumanS. E. (2021). New empiricisms in the anthropocene: Thinking with speculative fiction about science and social inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420943643
9.
DourishP.BellG. (2011). Divining the digital future. MIT Press.
10.
DuqueM.PinkS.StrengersY.MartinR.NichollsL. (2021). Automation, wellbeing and digital voice assistants: Older people and Google devices. Convergence, 27(5), 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211038537
11.
FloresC. (2007). Sharing anthropology: Collaborative video experiences among Maya film-makers in post-war Guatemala. In PinkS. (Eds.), Visual interventions (pp. 209–224). Berghahn.
12.
GunnW.OttoT.SmithR. C. (Eds). (2013). Design anthropology: Theory and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
13.
HenleyP. (2020). Beyond observation. Manchester University Press.
14.
IngoldT. (2013) Making. Routledge.
15.
IngoldT.HallamE. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In HallamE.IngoldT. (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 1–24). Berg.
16.
JasanoffS. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In JasanoffS.KimS-H. (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). University of Chicago Press.
17.
JasanoffS.KimS-H. (Eds). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press.
18.
KuehnerA.PloderA.LangerP. C. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: European contributions to strong reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658069
LindgrenT.PinkS.ForsV. (2021). Foresighting autonomous driving: An ethnographic approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121105.
21.
MacDougallD. (1998). Transcultural cinema. Princeton University Press.
22.
MacDougallD. (2005). The corporeal image: Film, ethnography, and the senses. Princeton University Press.
23.
MarksL. (2000). The skin of the film. Duke University Press.
24.
MarresN. (2018). What if nothing happens? Street trials of intelligent cars as experiments in participation. In MaassenS.DickelS.SchneiderC. H. (Eds.), TechnoScience in society, sociology of knowledge yearbook. Springer/Kluwer.
25.
MartinezA.CamasV. (2007). The rhythm of our dreams: A proposal for an applied visual anthropology. In PinkS. (Ed.), Visual interventions: Applied visual anthropology (pp. 227–246). Berghahn.
26.
MartinezF.FredriksenM. D.di PuppoL. (2021). Introduction: Welcome to the corners of the peripheral. In MartinezF.di PuppoL.FredriksenM. D. (Eds.), Peripheral methodologies: Unlearning, not-knowing and ethnographic limits (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
27.
MattinglyC.ThroopJ. (2018). The anthropology of ethics and morality annual. Review of Anthropology, 47(1), 475–492.
28.
Merleau-PontyM. (1969). La Prose du monde. In LefortC. (Ed.), The prose of the world, John O’Neill (trans.). Northwestern University Press.
29.
MichaelM. (2016). Speculative design and digital materialities: Idiocy, threat and compromise. In ArdevolE.PinkS.LanzeniD. (Eds.), Digital materialities: Design and anthropology (pp. 99–113). Bloomsbury.
30.
MorozovE. (2013). To save everything, click here: Technology, Solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that dont exist. Penguin Books.
31.
PinkS. (2004) Home truths. Berg.
32.
PinkS. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography. SAGE.
33.
PinkS. (2021a). Anthropology in an uncertain world. In PodjedD. (Ed.), Why the world needs anthropologists (pp. 56–70). Routledge.
34.
PinkS. (2021b). Doing visual ethnography. SAGE.
35.
PinkS. (2021c). Sensuous futures: Re-thinking the concept of trust in design anthropology. Senses & Society, 6(2), 193–202.
36.
PinkS. (2022a). Trust, ethics and automation: Anticipatory imaginaries in everyday life. In PinkS.LuptonD.BergM.RuckensteinM. (Eds.), Everyday automation (pp. 44–58). Routledge.
37.
PinkS.ForsV.GlössM. (2018). The contingent futures of the mobile present: Beyond automation as innovation. Mobilities, 13(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2018.1436672
PinkS.MackleyK. L. (2014). Reenactment methodologies for everyday life research: Art therapy insights for video ethnography. Visual Studies, 29(2), 146–154.
PinkS.OszK.RaatsK.LindgrenT.ForsV. (2020). Design anthropology for emerging technologies: Trust and sharing in autonomous driving futures. Design Studies, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.04.002
44.
PinkS.RaatsK.LindgrenT.OszK.ForsV. (2021). An interventional design anthropology of emerging technologies. In BruunM. H.WahlbergA.KristensenD. B.Douglas-JonesR.HasseC.HøyerK.WinthereikB. R. (Eds.), The handbook for the anthropology of technology (pp. 183–200). Palgrave.
45.
PinkS.SalazarJ. F. (2017). Anthropologies and futures: Setting the agenda. In SalazarJ.PinkS.IrvingA.SjobergJ. (Eds.), Anthropologies and futures. Bloomsbury.
46.
PinkS.StrengersY.DuqueM.NichollsL.MartinR. (2022). Emerging technologies and everyday media. In CostaE.SinananJ., et al (Eds.), Handbook of media anthropology. Routledge.
47.
RottinghausA. R. (2021). Smart homes and the new white futurism. Journal of Futures Studies, 25(4), 45–56.
48.
RouchJ. (2003).The camera and man. In FeldS. (Ed.), Ciné-Ethnography: Jean Rouch (pp. 29–46). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1973)
49.
SadowskiJ. (2020). Too smart. MIT Press.
50.
SalazarJ. F. (2017). Speculative fabulation: Researching worlds to come in Antarctica. In SalazarJ.PinkS.IrvingA.SjobergJ. (Eds.), Future anthropologies. Bloomsbury.
51.
ShoreC.WrightS. (2018). How the big 4 got big: Audit culture and the metamorphosis of international accountancy firms. Critique of Anthropology, 38(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X18775815
52.
SjobergJ. (2017). Ethno science fiction: Projective improvisations of future scenarios and environmental threat in the everyday life of British youth. In SalazarJ.PinkS.IrvingA.SjobergJ. (Eds.), Future anthropologies. Bloomsbury.
53.
SmithR. C.OttoT. (2016). Cultures of the future: Emergence and intervention in design anthropology. In SmithR. C.VangkildeK. T.KjærsgaardM. G.OttoT.HalseJ.BinderT. (Eds.), Design anthropological futures (pp. 19–36). Bloomsbury Academic.
54.
StilgoeJ.CohenT. (2021). Rejecting acceptance: Learning from public dialogue on self-driving vehicles. Science and Public Policy, 48(6), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab060
StrengersY.DuqueM.MortimerM.PinkS.EugeneA.MartinR.NichollsL.HoranB.ThomsonS. (2021). Smart homes for seniors: Intelligent home solutions for independent living (Final research evaluation report). McLean Care, Monash University and Deakin University. https://intelligenthomesolutions.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Final-Report.pdf
61.
StrengersY.PinkS.NichollsL. (2019). Smart energy futures and social practice imaginaries: Forecasting scenarios for pet care in Australian homes. Energy Research and Social Science, 48, 108–115.
62.
van der RietM. (2008). Participatory research and the philosophy of social science: Beyond the moral imperative. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(4), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408314350
63.
VanniniP. (Ed). (2020). The Routledge International Handbook of ethnographic film and video. Routledge.
64.
WaltorpK. (2020). Why muslim women and smartphones: Mirror images. Routledge.
65.
WaltorpK. (2021). Isomorphic articulations Notes from collaborative film-work in an Afghan-Danish Film Collective. In MartinezF.di PuppoL.FredriksenM. D. (Eds.), Peripheral methodologies: Unlearning, not-knowing and ethnographic limits (pp. 115–130). Routledge.
PinkS. (2021). Director, Smart Homes for Seniors. Emerging Technologies Research Lab, Monash University.
68.
PinkS. (2022b). Director. Digital energy futures. Emerging Technologies Research Lab, Monash University.
69.
PinkS.AstariN. (2015). Directors. Laundry lives. Digital Ethnography Research Centre and Design Research Institute, RMIT.
70.
SalazarJ. (2015) Director. Nighfall on Gaia. Documentary film.
71.
SjobergJ. (2007) Director. Transfiction. Documentary film.
72.
SjobergJ. (2021) Director. Call me Back. Documentary film.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
