This article explores the loss, legacy, and liberatory possibilities of addressing adoption through collaborative autoethnographic writing. We invite readers, through critical autoethnographic narratives and scholarship, to engage with our lived experiences as both cultural and familial histories. The return to the pre-adoption place of origin will not give us the closure we seek, so here we explore the future-making potential of collective adoptee narratives. If home may be less of an origin and more of a destination, each of the four authors engages in this autoethnographic research as a creative and collaborative means of finding a way toward becoming-home.
BartholetE. (1991). Where do black children belong? The politics of race matching in adoption. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 139(5), 1163–1256.
3.
BowersJ. (2016). Strangers at home: Place, belonging and Australian life writing. Cambria Publishing.
4.
BrookfieldH.BrownS. D.ReaveyP. (2008). Vicarious and post-memory practices in adopting families: The re-production of the past through photography and narrative. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18(5), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.960/full
5.
CelanP. (2001). Selected poems and prose (FelstinerJ., Trans.). W.W. Norton.
6.
CuthbertD.MurphyK.QuartlyM. (2009). Adoption and feminism: Toward framing a feminist response to contemporary developments in adoption. Australian Feminist Studies, 24(62), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164640903289302
7.
FortierA. M. (2001). “Coming home”: Queer migrations and multiple evocations of home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754940100400403
8.
FreudS. (1989). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. W.W. Norton.
9.
GoodwachR. (2004). Jocasta and the Oedipus myth: The adoption-reunion context for feelings of sexual attraction. Australasian Journal of Psychotherapy, 23(2), 46–65.
HarrisA. (2014). Ghost-child. In WyattJ.AdamsT. E. (Eds.), On (writing) families: Autoethnographies of presence and absence, love and loss (pp. 69–75). Sense.
12.
HarrisA.GandolfoE. (2014). Looked at and looked over or: I wish I was adopted. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(5), 567–581.
13.
Holman JonesS.HarrisA. M. (2018). Queering autoethnography. Routledge.
HomansM. (2013). Imprint of another life: Adoption narratives and human possibility. University of Michigan Press.
16.
LamC. (2015). Trauma and testimony: Embodied memory in Loida Maretza Perez’s “geographies of home.”Rocky Mountain Review, 69(1), 37–48.
17.
LiftonB. J. (1994). Journey of the adopted self: A quest for wholeness. Basic Books.
18.
LoveH. (2007). Feeling backward: Loss and the politics of queer history. Harvard University Press.
19.
ManningE. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. MIT Press.
20.
NationA. (2001). Betwixt and between: An exploration of adoption reunion realities following New Zealand non-Maori adoptions, from a psychodynamic perspective. NZAP Forum: The Journal of the New Zealand Association of Psychotherapists, 7, 101–122.
21.
ProbynE. (2015). Outside belongings. Routledge.
22.
ShahaniN. (2012). Queer retrosexualities: The Politics of reparative return. Lexington Books.
23.
TreacherA.KatzI. (2001). Narrative and fantasy in adoption. Adoption & Fostering, 25(3), 20–28.
24.
VerrierN. (1993). The primal wound: Understanding the adopted child. Gateway Press.
25.
WintersonJ. (2012). Why be happy when you could be normal?Vintage.
26.
WyattJ.SpeedyJ. (Eds.). (2014). Collaborative writing as inquiry. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
YngvessonB.MahoneyM. A. (2000). “As one should, ought and wants to be” belonging and authenticity in identity narratives. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(6), 77–110.
