The purpose of this article is to “do something less intentional” with post-qualitative inquiry while thinking about scholarship and “methodologies” as hesitant moves and uncertain stances always in necessary and immanent flux. Coming from hesitation and uncertainty post-qualitative inquiry does not mean anything specific or particular to me. Rather, I focus on the potential embedded in post-qualitative projects while I also worry about creating boundaries around immanently shifting practices.
BenjaminW. (1999). The arcades project. Belknap Press.
2.
CulybaR.HeimerC.Coleman PettyJ. (2004). The ethnographic turn: Fact, fashion, or fiction?Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 365–389.
3.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
4.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
5.
FoucaultM. (1984). What is an author? In RabinowP. (Ed.), Foucault reader (pp. 101–120). Pantheon Books.
6.
FoucaultM. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. New Press.
7.
GerrardJ.RudolphS.SriprakasA. (2017). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 384–394.
8.
GreeneJ. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788763
9.
JacksonA.MazzeiL. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
10.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2012). Researchers of the world, create!Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 806–816.
11.
KuhnT. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
12.
Kwok-bunC.DaveyG. (2010). When worlds collide: Scientists doing science in the social world. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38(4), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853110X517809
MassumiB. (2017). The principle of unrest: Activist philosophy in the expanded field. Open Humanities Press.
17.
MortonT. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press.
18.
NakayamaS.NakamuraY. (2004). A fashion model with social interaction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 337(3), 625–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.01.046
19.
NeilsenB. (2000). Deterritorializing the Bermuda Triangle: Popular geography and the myths of globalization. Space and Culture, 6, 48–62.
20.
PotterP. (2000). Skinning the (CAT)Tt. Space and Culture, 6, 63–76.
21.
ShieldsD. (2010). Reality hunger: A manifesto. Vintage Books.
22.
St. PierreE. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Project, 25(1), 3–16.
23.
TaylorC. (2017). Rethinking the empirical in higher education: Postqualitative inquiry as a less comfortable social science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1256984
