This article traces 25 years of scholarship that used the concept haecceity to slowly deconstruct or deterritorialize conventional qualitative methodology and think post qualitative inquiry, which might help lay out a plane of inquiry that will enable new concepts and practices such as using concepts instead of methods to inquire.
BalM. (2002). Traveling concepts in the humanities: A rough guide. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
2.
BarardK. (1999). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In BiagioliM. (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1-11). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BaudrillardJ. (1988). Simulacra and simulations. In PosterM. (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings (FossP.PattonP.BeitchmanP., Trans.) (pp. 166-184). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1981)
4.
BogueR. (1989). Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge.
5.
BogueR. (1996). Deleuze’s style. Man and World, 29, 251-268.
6.
BontaM. (2009). Taking Deleuze into the field: Machinic ethnography for the social sciences. Deleuze Studies, 3, 135-142.
7.
BontaM.ProteviJ. (2004). Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and a glossary. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
8.
BovéP. A. (1990). Discourse. In LentricchiaF.McLaughlinT. (Eds.), Critical terms for literary study (pp. 50-65). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
BrownS. D. (2010). Between the planes: Deleuze and social science. In JensenC.RodjeK. (Eds.), Deleuzian intersection: Science, technology, anthropology (pp. 101-120). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
10.
BryantL. R. (2008). Difference and givenness: Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanance. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
11.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ButlerJ. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In ButlerJ.ScottJ. W. (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CullerJ. (2000). Philosophy and literature: The fortunes of the performative. Poetics Today, 21, 503-519.
14.
DeLandaM. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York, NY: Continuum.
15.
DeleuzeG. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image (TomlinsonH.GaletaR., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1985)
16.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
17.
DeleuzeG. (1995). Negotiations: 1972-1990 (JoughinM., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990)
18.
DeleuzeG. (2004). On Nietzsche and the image of thought. In DeleuzeG. (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953-1974 (LapoujadeD., Ed., TaominaM., Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 2002)
19.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
20.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.BurchellG., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1991)
21.
DeleuzeG.ParnetC. (2007). Dialogues II (Rev. ed.) (TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)
22.
DerridaJ. (1990). Some statements and truisms about neologisms, newisms, positisms, parasitisms, and other small seismisms (TomicheA., Trans.). In CarollD. (Ed.), The states of “theory”: History, art, and critical discourse (pp. 63-92). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
23.
DerridaJ. (2007). Psyche: Inventions of the other (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
DerridaJ. (2008). The animal that therefore I am (WillsD., Ed., MalletM. -L., Trans.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press. (Original work published 2006)
25.
DescartesR. (1993). Discourse on method and Meditations on first philosophy (4th ed., CressD. A., Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. (Discourse on Method first published 1637 and Meditations on First Philosophy first published 1641)
26.
DeuR. (2007). Deleuze. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
27.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (SmithA. M. S., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1966)
28.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. In DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208-226). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
FuglsangM.SørensenB. M. (Eds.). (2006). Deleuze and the social. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
30.
GaneN. (2009). Concepts and the “new” empiricism. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 83-97.
31.
KeenanT. (1997). Fables of responsibilities: Aberrations and predicaments in ethics and politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
32.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
LatherP. A.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629-633.
34.
LawlorL. (2003). Thinking through French philosophy: The being of the question. Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press.
35.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (BenningtonG.MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
36.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MassumiB. (2002a). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
MassumiB. (Ed.). (2002b). A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari. London, England: Routledge.
40.
MayT. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
NietzscheF. (1992). Basic writings of Nietzsche (KaufmannW., Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY: Modern Library.
42.
RajchmanJ. (2001). The Deleuze connections. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
RichardsonL.St. PierreE. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
RortyR. (1986). Foucault and epistemology. In Couzens HoyD. (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 41-49). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
45.
St. PierreE. A. (1995). Arts of existence: The construction of subjectivity in older, white southern women (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
46.
St. PierreE. A. (1997a). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189.
47.
St. PierreE. A. (1997b). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 365-383.
48.
St. PierreE. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 477-515.
49.
St. PierreE. A. (2011a). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611-635). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
50.
St. PierreE. A. (2011b). Refusing human being in humanist qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the global crisis (pp. 40-55). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
51.
St. PierreE. A. (2013a). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 13, 223-227.
52.
St. PierreE. A. (2013b). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646-657.
53.
St. PierreE. A. (2015). Practices for the “new” in the new empiricisms, the new materialisms, and post qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75-95). Walnut Grove, CA: Left Coast Press.
54.
St. PierreE. A. (2016a). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.”Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2-19.
55.
St. PierreE. A. (2016b). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 16, 111-124.
56.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 715-719.
57.
SauvagnarguesA. (2013). Deleuze and art (BankstonS., Trans.). London, England: Bloomsbury.
58.
SmithD. W. (2010a). Deleuze: Concepts as continuous variation (LitakerJ. S., Interviewer). Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry, 5(11), 57-60.
59.
SmithD. W. (2010b). On the becoming of concepts. In SmithD.Essays on Deleuze (pp. 122-145). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
60.
SmithD. W. (2012). Concepts and creation. In BraidottiR.PistersP. (Eds.), Revising normativity with Deleuze (pp. 175-188). London, England: Bloomsbury.
61.
SpivakG. C. (1974). Translator’s preface. In DerridaJ. (Ed.), Of grammatology (SpivakG. C., Trans.) (pp. ix-xc). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
62.
SpivakG. C. (1990). Theory in the margin: Coetzee’s foe reading Defoe’s Crusoe/Roxana. In AracJ.JohnsonB. (Eds.), Consequences of theory (pp. 154-180). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63.
Van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
