This article explains that post qualitative inquiry is not a pre-existing humanist social science research methodology with research designs, processes, methods, and practices. It cannot be accommodated by nor is it another version of qualitative research methodology. It refuses method and methodology altogether and begins with poststructuralism, its ontology of immanence, and its description of major philosophical concepts including the nature of being and human being, language, representation, knowledge, truth, rationality, and so on. Its goal is not to find and represent something that exists in the empirical world of human lived experience but to re-orient thought to experiment and create new forms of thought and life.
BuchananI. (2015). Assemblage theory and its discontents. Deleuze Studies, 9(3), 382–392.
2.
ButlerJ. (1995). For a careful reading. In BenhabibS.ButlerJ.CornellD.FraserN. (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127–143). Routledge.
3.
DalyM. (1973). Beyond God the father. Beacon Press.
4.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
5.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.BurchellG., Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1991)
6.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (Sheridan SmithA. M., Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1966)
7.
HalperinD. (1995). Saint Foucault: Towards a gay hagiography. Oxford University Press.
8.
LatherP. A. (1997, March). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography [Paper presentation]. The 1997 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
9.
LatherP. A. (2002). Postbook: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(11), 199–227.
10.
LatherP. A.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.
11.
LentricchiaF.McLaughlinT. (Eds.). (1990). Critical terms for literary study. University of Chicago Press.
12.
MarcusG. E. (1994). What comes (just) after “post”? The case of ethnography. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563–574). SAGE.
13.
MarcusG. E.FischerM. M. J. (1986). A crisis of representation in the social sciences. In MarcusG. E.FischerM. M. (Eds.), Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences (pp. 7–16). The University of Chicago Press.
St. PierreE. A. (1995). Arts of existence: The construction of subjectivity in older, white southern women [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
17.
St. PierreE. A. (2010, May). Post qualitative research [Paper presentation]. The Sixth International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry.
18.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611–635). SAGE.
19.
St. PierreE. A. (2013a). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.
20.
St. PierreE. A. (2013b). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.
21.
St. PierreE. A. (2014a). An always already absent collaboration. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(4), 374–379.
22.
St. PierreE. A. (2014b). Ethics in entanglement. Knowledge Cultures, 1(5), 141–155.
23.
St. PierreE. A. (2015). Practices for the “new” in the new empiricisms, the new materialisms, and post qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75–95). Left Coast Press.
24.
St. PierreE. A. (2016a). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.”Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19.
25.
St. PierreE. A. (2016b). Curriculum for new material, new empirical inquiry. In SnazaN.SonuD.TrumanS. E.ZaliwskaZ. (Eds.), Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies (pp. 1–12). Peter Lang.
26.
St. PierreE. A. (2016c). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124.
27.
St. PierreE. A. (2016d). Untraining educational researchers. Research in Education, 96(1), 6–11.
28.
St. PierreE. A. (2017a). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1080–1089.
29.
St. PierreE. A. (2017b). Haecceity: Laying out a plane for post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 686–698.
30.
St. PierreE. A. (2017c). Post qualitative inquiry: The next generation. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times (pp. 37–47). SAGE.
31.
St. PierreE. A. (2018a). Postmodernism is not dead. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(14), 1587–1588.
32.
St. PierreE. A. (2018b). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–608.
33.
St. PierreE. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3–16.
34.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719.
35.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 299–110.
36.
St. PierreE. A.TaguchiH. L. (2017). Using concept as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 643–648.
37.
St. PierreE. A.PillowW. S. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. Routledge.
38.
UlmerG. L. (1985). Applied grammatology: Post(e)-pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys. John Hopkins University Press.
39.
WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB.DenzinN. K.St. PierreE. A. (2014). Deleuze and collaborative writing: Responding to/with “JKSB.”Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(4), 407–416.
